3D Printing in the Context of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education at the College/University Level

P. Moeck, P. DeStefano, W. Kaminsky, Trevor J. Snyder
{"title":"3D Printing in the Context of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education at the College/University Level","authors":"P. Moeck, P. DeStefano, W. Kaminsky, Trevor J. Snyder","doi":"10.1201/9780429351631-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An overview concerning 3D printing (a.k.a. additive manufacturing) within the context of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education at the college/university level is provided. The vast majority of quoted papers report self-made models for which faculty members and their students have created the necessary 3D print files themselves by various routes. The prediction by the Gartner consulting company that it will take more than ten years from July 2014 onwards for Classroom 3D Printing to reach its Plateau of Productivity in one of their hallmark Visibility versus Time (Hype Cycle) graphs is critically assessed. The bibliography of this book chapter sums up the state-of-the art in 3D printing for STEM (including nano-science and nano-engineering) education at the college level approximately four years after Gartner's prediction. Current methodologies and best practices of college-level Classroom 3D printing are described in the main section of this review. Detailed information is given mainly for those papers in which the authors of this book chapter are authors and co-authors. A straightforward route from crystallographic information framework files (CIFs) at a very large open-access database to 3D print files for atomic-level crystal and molecule structure models is described here in some detail. Because the development of methodologies and best practices are typical activities of the penultimate stage of a Hype Cycle, we conclude that (i) Gartner's prediction underestimates the creativity, resourcefulness, and commitment of college educators to their students and that (ii) Classroom 3D Printing will be a widespread reality significantly earlier than the middle of the next decade (at least in the USA as more than one half of the relevant/quoted papers originated there). An appendix provides a brief technical review of contemporary 3D printing techniques.","PeriodicalId":427533,"journal":{"name":"21st Century Nanoscience – A Handbook","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st Century Nanoscience – A Handbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429351631-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

An overview concerning 3D printing (a.k.a. additive manufacturing) within the context of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education at the college/university level is provided. The vast majority of quoted papers report self-made models for which faculty members and their students have created the necessary 3D print files themselves by various routes. The prediction by the Gartner consulting company that it will take more than ten years from July 2014 onwards for Classroom 3D Printing to reach its Plateau of Productivity in one of their hallmark Visibility versus Time (Hype Cycle) graphs is critically assessed. The bibliography of this book chapter sums up the state-of-the art in 3D printing for STEM (including nano-science and nano-engineering) education at the college level approximately four years after Gartner's prediction. Current methodologies and best practices of college-level Classroom 3D printing are described in the main section of this review. Detailed information is given mainly for those papers in which the authors of this book chapter are authors and co-authors. A straightforward route from crystallographic information framework files (CIFs) at a very large open-access database to 3D print files for atomic-level crystal and molecule structure models is described here in some detail. Because the development of methodologies and best practices are typical activities of the penultimate stage of a Hype Cycle, we conclude that (i) Gartner's prediction underestimates the creativity, resourcefulness, and commitment of college educators to their students and that (ii) Classroom 3D Printing will be a widespread reality significantly earlier than the middle of the next decade (at least in the USA as more than one half of the relevant/quoted papers originated there). An appendix provides a brief technical review of contemporary 3D printing techniques.
3D打印在科学、技术、工程和数学教育背景下的学院/大学水平
概述了3D打印(又名增材制造)在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育背景下的学院/大学水平。绝大多数引用的论文报告自制模型,教师和他们的学生通过各种途径自己创建了必要的3D打印文件。Gartner咨询公司预测,从2014年7月开始,教室3D打印将需要十多年的时间才能达到其标志性的可见性与时间(炒作周期)图表之一的生产力平台。这一章的参考书目总结了3D打印技术在STEM(包括纳米科学和纳米工程)大学教育方面的最新进展,大约在Gartner预测的四年后。当前大学级课堂3D打印的方法和最佳实践在这篇综述的主要部分进行了描述。详细的信息主要是给那些论文的作者在本书的章节是作者和共同作者。从一个非常大的开放访问数据库中的晶体信息框架文件(CIFs)到原子级晶体和分子结构模型的3D打印文件的直接路线在这里进行了详细描述。因为方法和最佳实践的发展是炒作周期倒数第二阶段的典型活动,我们得出结论:(i) Gartner的预测低估了大学教育者对学生的创造力、智多能和承诺;(ii)教室3D打印将在未来十年中期之前成为广泛的现实(至少在美国,超过一半的相关/引用论文来自美国)。附录提供了当代3D打印技术的简要技术回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信