Diversio Diversity and Inclusion Survey – Framework and Psychometric properties

Somkene Igboanugo, Jieru Yang, P. Bigelow
{"title":"Diversio Diversity and Inclusion Survey – Framework and Psychometric properties","authors":"Somkene Igboanugo, Jieru Yang, P. Bigelow","doi":"10.33137/ijidi.v6i4.37507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliable and valid methods are imperative to assess any organization’s diversity and inclusion practices. Therefore, the Diversio Diversity and Inclusion Survey (DDIS), an instrument built on a framework of five core themes (inclusive culture, fair management, access to networks, flexible working conditions, and safe working environment), and designed to measure inclusion metrics for organizations, was tested to examine its psychometric properties. The DDIS was developed through a collaboration of industry experts, including those with the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business (CCAB) and the LGBTQ Chamber of Commerce. Initial testing and focus groups with over 60 participants belonging to equity-deserving groups ensured the instrument had good content validity. After the initial testing, pilot testing involving a diverse sample of working adults from 25 companies in Canada, the U.S., and the United Kingdom was completed. Psychometric properties of the 5-item DDIS scale were examined based on a cross-sectional survey of 8,800 working adults from various industries worldwide. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient1. The Cronbach alpha was 0.840 with all item-total correlations greater than 0.5. Therefore, the DDIS, which has good content validity and good internal consistency, should prove helpful in conducting assessments of diversity and inclusion culture and practices at any organization. In addition, organizations can survey their employees to gather relevant information to drive policy and organizational change.","PeriodicalId":355223,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v6i4.37507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reliable and valid methods are imperative to assess any organization’s diversity and inclusion practices. Therefore, the Diversio Diversity and Inclusion Survey (DDIS), an instrument built on a framework of five core themes (inclusive culture, fair management, access to networks, flexible working conditions, and safe working environment), and designed to measure inclusion metrics for organizations, was tested to examine its psychometric properties. The DDIS was developed through a collaboration of industry experts, including those with the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business (CCAB) and the LGBTQ Chamber of Commerce. Initial testing and focus groups with over 60 participants belonging to equity-deserving groups ensured the instrument had good content validity. After the initial testing, pilot testing involving a diverse sample of working adults from 25 companies in Canada, the U.S., and the United Kingdom was completed. Psychometric properties of the 5-item DDIS scale were examined based on a cross-sectional survey of 8,800 working adults from various industries worldwide. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient1. The Cronbach alpha was 0.840 with all item-total correlations greater than 0.5. Therefore, the DDIS, which has good content validity and good internal consistency, should prove helpful in conducting assessments of diversity and inclusion culture and practices at any organization. In addition, organizations can survey their employees to gather relevant information to drive policy and organizational change.
多样性和包容性调查-框架和心理测量学性质
可靠和有效的方法是评估任何组织的多样性和包容性实践的必要条件。因此,多元化、多样性和包容性调查(DDIS)是一个建立在五个核心主题(包容性文化、公平管理、网络访问、灵活的工作条件和安全的工作环境)框架上的工具,旨在衡量组织的包容性指标,并对其进行了测试,以检验其心理测量特性。DDIS是由行业专家合作制定的,包括加拿大土著商业委员会(CCAB)和LGBTQ商会。最初的测试和有60多名公平群体参与者的焦点小组确保了该工具具有良好的内容效度。在最初的测试之后,试点测试涉及来自加拿大、美国和英国的25家公司的不同样本的工作成年人。本研究通过对来自世界各地不同行业的8800名在职成年人的横断面调查,对DDIS量表的五项心理测量特性进行了检验。采用Cronbach’s alpha系数对量表的内部一致性信度进行分析。Cronbach alpha为0.840,所有项目-总量相关系数均大于0.5。因此,具有良好内容效度和良好内部一致性的DDIS应该有助于对任何组织的多样性和包容性文化和实践进行评估。此外,组织可以调查他们的员工来收集相关信息,以推动政策和组织变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信