{"title":"Bernardito Bravo con Fisco de Chile. Apuntes sobre la evolución histórica de la responsabilidad patrimonial de la administración del estado de Chile","authors":"C. Cordero","doi":"10.5354/RCHD.V0I22.22149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article exposes the evolution of the patrimonial responsability of the Chilean State Administration, from the Indian law to the present. It plans, in synthesis, that the Indian law recognized a guarantistic regime of patrimonial responability of the Administration, becoming direct (the imputation affects the Administration, not the functionary) and objective (prescinds, for compromising, of the guilt notion -or service's guilt-), and later, during the Republican law, its juridical mythologies (sovereignty, authority acts, govemment acts, etc.) meaned a firm retrocession about it, bacause they consecrated, totally or partially, the patrimonail irresponsability of the State Administration -and the exclusive responsability of the agent who materially caused the damage-, al1 of which started to revert in the jurisprudence since the case \"Bemardino Bravo against Fisco\", in 1858, process that concludes in the present time after 150 years (of evolutions and involutions), paradoxically, with the acknowledgment of a regime of patrimonial responability of the Administration with analogous characteristics this institue preseted during the Indian law (second half of the XVIII century).","PeriodicalId":153786,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Historia del Derecho","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Historia del Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/RCHD.V0I22.22149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present article exposes the evolution of the patrimonial responsability of the Chilean State Administration, from the Indian law to the present. It plans, in synthesis, that the Indian law recognized a guarantistic regime of patrimonial responability of the Administration, becoming direct (the imputation affects the Administration, not the functionary) and objective (prescinds, for compromising, of the guilt notion -or service's guilt-), and later, during the Republican law, its juridical mythologies (sovereignty, authority acts, govemment acts, etc.) meaned a firm retrocession about it, bacause they consecrated, totally or partially, the patrimonail irresponsability of the State Administration -and the exclusive responsability of the agent who materially caused the damage-, al1 of which started to revert in the jurisprudence since the case "Bemardino Bravo against Fisco", in 1858, process that concludes in the present time after 150 years (of evolutions and involutions), paradoxically, with the acknowledgment of a regime of patrimonial responability of the Administration with analogous characteristics this institue preseted during the Indian law (second half of the XVIII century).
本文揭示了智利国家行政机关的世袭责任从印度法律到现在的演变。它综合地设想,印度法律承认了一种政府世袭责任的保障制度,这种制度成为直接的(责任的归属影响到行政部门,而不影响到公务员)和客观的(对罪责概念或公职的罪责的妥协),后来,在共和法律时期,它的司法神话(主权、权威行为、政府行为等)意味着对它的坚定退让,因为它们全部或部分地神圣化了,国家行政部门的传统不负责任,以及造成重大损害的代理人的专属责任,所有这些都开始在1858年的“贝马迪诺布拉沃诉菲斯科案”(Bemardino Bravo against Fisco)以来的法理学中恢复,这一过程在经过150年(演变和演变)之后,在今天结束,矛盾的是,承认了政府的世袭责任制度,这种制度在印度法律(十八世纪下半叶)中提出了类似的特点。