Europe's Lost Appeal? The Greek Debt Crisis and ASEAN Integration Trajectory

S. Choiruzzad
{"title":"Europe's Lost Appeal? The Greek Debt Crisis and ASEAN Integration Trajectory","authors":"S. Choiruzzad","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2757549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What the Greek Debt Crisis and the impasse of the European Integration project mean for ASEAN integration? This article argues that there are at least three possible influence of the events in Greece. First, it could be expected that the normative pressures for a liberal trajectory, both internal and external, are going to decline. The EU will be more cautious in using its toolbox for norm diffusion due to its internal problem with Greece. At the same time, the appeal of liberal prescriptions is also becoming less powerful both at global level (due to the last Global Crisis) and at the domestic level. Second, the prominence of realist mode of interaction in the model liberal institution (the EU) as presented in the case of Greece debt crisis might make ASEAN leaders to place their trust more in power-based calculation rather than liberal prescriptions. Furthermore, Southeast Asia is the region that experience the direct impact of China’s rise, US balancing strategy, and Japan’s attempts to ‘normalize’ itself. Third, the case of Greece debt crisis illustrated the phenomenon of “integration overstretch,” a situation where the desire for deepening and enlarging regional institution is not coupled with the willingness or capacity of the members (or its hegemon) to pay for the price. ASEAN leaders might have to learn from this phenomenon closely.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2757549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What the Greek Debt Crisis and the impasse of the European Integration project mean for ASEAN integration? This article argues that there are at least three possible influence of the events in Greece. First, it could be expected that the normative pressures for a liberal trajectory, both internal and external, are going to decline. The EU will be more cautious in using its toolbox for norm diffusion due to its internal problem with Greece. At the same time, the appeal of liberal prescriptions is also becoming less powerful both at global level (due to the last Global Crisis) and at the domestic level. Second, the prominence of realist mode of interaction in the model liberal institution (the EU) as presented in the case of Greece debt crisis might make ASEAN leaders to place their trust more in power-based calculation rather than liberal prescriptions. Furthermore, Southeast Asia is the region that experience the direct impact of China’s rise, US balancing strategy, and Japan’s attempts to ‘normalize’ itself. Third, the case of Greece debt crisis illustrated the phenomenon of “integration overstretch,” a situation where the desire for deepening and enlarging regional institution is not coupled with the willingness or capacity of the members (or its hegemon) to pay for the price. ASEAN leaders might have to learn from this phenomenon closely.
欧洲失去吸引力?希腊债务危机与东盟一体化进程
希腊债务危机和欧洲一体化项目的僵局对东盟一体化意味着什么?本文认为,这些事件对希腊至少有三种可能的影响。首先,可以预期的是,自由主义轨迹的规范压力(包括内部和外部压力)将会下降。由于希腊的内部问题,欧盟在使用规范扩散工具时将更加谨慎。与此同时,在全球层面(由于上一次全球危机)和国内层面,自由主义处方的吸引力也在减弱。其次,在希腊债务危机的情况下,现实主义互动模式在自由主义模式(欧盟)中的突出地位可能会使东盟领导人更多地信任基于权力的计算,而不是自由主义的处方。此外,东南亚是中国崛起、美国平衡战略和日本试图“正常化”的直接影响的地区。第三,希腊债务危机的例子说明了“一体化过度扩张”的现象,即深化和扩大区域机构的愿望与成员国(或其霸主)为此付出代价的意愿或能力不相匹配。东盟领导人或许必须密切学习这一现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信