A comparison of fly-fix-fly testing to the software development facility testing approach

C. Satterthwaite, G. Miyahara, S. Tomashefsky, I. Harnage
{"title":"A comparison of fly-fix-fly testing to the software development facility testing approach","authors":"C. Satterthwaite, G. Miyahara, S. Tomashefsky, I. Harnage","doi":"10.1109/DASC.1998.741488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New and legacy aircraft weapon systems depend on an increasingly complex verification and validation process to decrease the risks in operation, to increase mission success, and to provide flexibility for rapidly changing mission requirements. In this process, embedded software is a key ingredient for changing, recording, proving, and preserving the usefulness of the weapon system. The increased use of software is placing an increased demand for innovation to capture and observe the impacts of weapon system changes. The heavily relied upon fly-fix-fly testing approach to verification and validation will always have its place, but is losing its effectiveness to affordably, thoroughly and responsively assure the weapon system changes. This paper will provide a comparison of fly-fix-fly testing to the software development facility testing approach.","PeriodicalId":335827,"journal":{"name":"17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.1998.741488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

New and legacy aircraft weapon systems depend on an increasingly complex verification and validation process to decrease the risks in operation, to increase mission success, and to provide flexibility for rapidly changing mission requirements. In this process, embedded software is a key ingredient for changing, recording, proving, and preserving the usefulness of the weapon system. The increased use of software is placing an increased demand for innovation to capture and observe the impacts of weapon system changes. The heavily relied upon fly-fix-fly testing approach to verification and validation will always have its place, but is losing its effectiveness to affordably, thoroughly and responsively assure the weapon system changes. This paper will provide a comparison of fly-fix-fly testing to the software development facility testing approach.
fly-fix-fly测试与软件开发工具测试方法的比较
新型和传统飞机武器系统依赖于日益复杂的验证和验证过程,以降低操作风险,提高任务成功率,并为快速变化的任务需求提供灵活性。在这个过程中,嵌入式软件是改变、记录、证明和保持武器系统有用性的关键因素。软件使用的增加增加了对捕获和观察武器系统变化影响的创新的需求。严重依赖于“飞-固-飞”测试方法的核查和确认将始终有其地位,但正在失去其有效性,无法负担得起,彻底和响应性地确保武器系统的变化。本文将提供fly-fix-fly测试与软件开发工具测试方法的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信