{"title":"William J. Abraham, Divine Agency and Divine Action, Volume III: Systematic Theology","authors":"Justus H. Hunter","doi":"10.1177/1063851220969899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"William Abraham’s four-volume Divine Agency and Divine Action promises to be the most significant advance in evangelical Methodist theology since Thomas C. Oden’s Classic Christianity. This is the third of the soon-to-becompleted four-volume set from Oxford University Press. The first volume gives a philosophical analysis of the concept of divine action. Abraham’s central thesis there is that the concept of action is open. That is, no fixed set of necessary and sufficient conditions can be supplied for those phenomena denominated “action.” Thus, the path to analysis of any given action will be particular; it must develop from the particular phenomenon itself, rather than by application of some general definition of action to any particular case. If this is true for creaturely actions, so it will be for any instance of divine action. The path to understanding action, divine or creaturely, lies in particularist attention to individual cases. And, Abraham argues, the theologian ought to be relieved by this insight. More than that, theologians should be invigorated. Since action is an open concept, we set out in pursuit of detailed reflection upon particular divine actions. And this is exactly what Christian theologians have, in their finest and most valuable moments, always done: attentively developed particular analyses of particular acts. The second volume of Divine Agency and Divine Action narrates key moments in the history of Christian theology as just such a venture. Abraham shows how theologians across the Christian past have approached particular instances of divine action in a particularist manner. This third volume begins to sketch a systematic theology across key dogmatic loci in light of Abraham’s fundamental commitments on divine action. The theology of Volume III is certainly a beginning. Many chapters are mere sketches and suggestions. This is a strength of the book, as Abraham has the unique ability to draw his readers along so many explorations of so many topics and themes in theology. And it is, at times, a weakness. 969899 PRE0010.1177/1063851220969899Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2020","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1063851220969899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
William Abraham’s four-volume Divine Agency and Divine Action promises to be the most significant advance in evangelical Methodist theology since Thomas C. Oden’s Classic Christianity. This is the third of the soon-to-becompleted four-volume set from Oxford University Press. The first volume gives a philosophical analysis of the concept of divine action. Abraham’s central thesis there is that the concept of action is open. That is, no fixed set of necessary and sufficient conditions can be supplied for those phenomena denominated “action.” Thus, the path to analysis of any given action will be particular; it must develop from the particular phenomenon itself, rather than by application of some general definition of action to any particular case. If this is true for creaturely actions, so it will be for any instance of divine action. The path to understanding action, divine or creaturely, lies in particularist attention to individual cases. And, Abraham argues, the theologian ought to be relieved by this insight. More than that, theologians should be invigorated. Since action is an open concept, we set out in pursuit of detailed reflection upon particular divine actions. And this is exactly what Christian theologians have, in their finest and most valuable moments, always done: attentively developed particular analyses of particular acts. The second volume of Divine Agency and Divine Action narrates key moments in the history of Christian theology as just such a venture. Abraham shows how theologians across the Christian past have approached particular instances of divine action in a particularist manner. This third volume begins to sketch a systematic theology across key dogmatic loci in light of Abraham’s fundamental commitments on divine action. The theology of Volume III is certainly a beginning. Many chapters are mere sketches and suggestions. This is a strength of the book, as Abraham has the unique ability to draw his readers along so many explorations of so many topics and themes in theology. And it is, at times, a weakness. 969899 PRE0010.1177/1063851220969899Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2020
威廉·亚伯拉罕的四卷本《神圣代理与神圣行动》有望成为自托马斯·c·奥登的《经典基督教》以来,福音派卫理公会神学最重要的进步。这是牛津大学出版社即将完成的四卷本的第三部。第一卷给出了神圣行动概念的哲学分析。亚伯拉罕的中心论点是行动的概念是开放的。也就是说,不能为那些被称为“行动”的现象提供一套固定的充分必要条件。因此,任何给定行动的分析路径都是特定的;它必须从特定现象本身发展而来,而不是将某种一般的行动定义应用于任何特定情况。如果这对于受造物的行为是正确的,那么对于任何神圣的行为也是如此。理解行为的途径,无论是神圣的还是受造物的,都在于对个案的特别关注。亚伯拉罕认为,神学家应该对这种见解感到宽慰。不仅如此,神学家们还应该振作起来。既然行动是一个开放的概念,我们开始追求对特定神圣行动的详细反思。而这正是基督教神学家,在他们最优秀最有价值的时刻所做的:专注地对特定行为进行特定分析。《神的代理和神的行动》第二卷叙述了基督教神学历史上的关键时刻,就像这样一个冒险。亚伯拉罕展示了过去基督教的神学家是如何以一种特殊的方式来处理神的行为的特定实例的。这第三卷开始勾勒出一个系统的神学跨越关键的教条轨迹,在亚伯拉罕的基本承诺,神圣的行动的光。第三卷的神学当然是一个开始。许多章节仅仅是提纲和建议。这是这本书的一个优势,因为亚伯拉罕有独特的能力吸引他的读者在神学的许多话题和主题上进行许多探索。有时,这是一种弱点。969899 PRE0010.1177/1063851220969899Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical theology, book Review, book- Review, 2020