Do RATs save lives? A retrospective analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in an English Ambulance Service

R. Pilbery, M. Teare
{"title":"Do RATs save lives? A retrospective analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in an English Ambulance Service","authors":"R. Pilbery, M. Teare","doi":"10.32378/ijp.v3i2.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study aimThis study aims to determine the impact of the red arrest teams (RATs) on survival to 30 days and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital.MethodsA retrospective cohort study analysing routinely collected data was undertaken. All adult (≥18 years) OHCAs entered onto the YAS computer aided dispatch (CAD) system between the 1st October, 2015 and 30th September, 2017 were included if the patient was resuscitated, and the cause of the arrest was considered to be medical in origin. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to enable adjustment for common predictors of survival and ROSC.ResultsDuring the 2-year data collection period, 15,151 cardiac arrests that were attended by Yorkshire Ambulance Service. After removing ineligible cases, 5,868 cardiac arrests remained. RATs attended 2,000/5,868 (34.1%) incidents, with each RAT attending a median of 13 cardiac arrests (IQR 7–23, minimum 1, maximum 78).The adjusted odds ratios suggest that a RAT on scene is associated with a slight increase in the odds of survival to 30 days (OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.74–1.38) and odds of ROSC on arrival at hospital (OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.99–1.29), compared to the odds of not having a RAT present, although neither results are statistically significant.ConclusionThe presence of a RAT paramedic was associated with a small increase in survival to 30 days and ROSC on arrival at hospital, although neither were statistically significant. Larger prospective studies are required to determine the effect of roles such as RAT on outcomes from OHCA","PeriodicalId":367364,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32378/ijp.v3i2.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study aimThis study aims to determine the impact of the red arrest teams (RATs) on survival to 30 days and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital.MethodsA retrospective cohort study analysing routinely collected data was undertaken. All adult (≥18 years) OHCAs entered onto the YAS computer aided dispatch (CAD) system between the 1st October, 2015 and 30th September, 2017 were included if the patient was resuscitated, and the cause of the arrest was considered to be medical in origin. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to enable adjustment for common predictors of survival and ROSC.ResultsDuring the 2-year data collection period, 15,151 cardiac arrests that were attended by Yorkshire Ambulance Service. After removing ineligible cases, 5,868 cardiac arrests remained. RATs attended 2,000/5,868 (34.1%) incidents, with each RAT attending a median of 13 cardiac arrests (IQR 7–23, minimum 1, maximum 78).The adjusted odds ratios suggest that a RAT on scene is associated with a slight increase in the odds of survival to 30 days (OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.74–1.38) and odds of ROSC on arrival at hospital (OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.99–1.29), compared to the odds of not having a RAT present, although neither results are statistically significant.ConclusionThe presence of a RAT paramedic was associated with a small increase in survival to 30 days and ROSC on arrival at hospital, although neither were statistically significant. Larger prospective studies are required to determine the effect of roles such as RAT on outcomes from OHCA
老鼠能救人吗?回顾性分析院外心脏骤停在英国救护车服务
研究目的本研究旨在确定红停组(RATs)对住院患者30天生存率和自然循环恢复(ROSC)的影响。方法采用回顾性队列研究,分析常规收集的资料。所有在2015年10月1日至2017年9月30日期间输入到YAS计算机辅助调度(CAD)系统的成人(≥18岁)ohca都被包括在内,如果患者复苏,并且骤停的原因被认为是医学原因。创建了多变量逻辑回归模型,以便对生存和ROSC的常见预测因子进行调整。结果在2年的数据收集期间,有15,151例心脏骤停患者接受了约克郡救护车服务。在剔除不符合条件的病例后,仍有5868例心脏骤停。大鼠参与2000 / 5868例(34.1%)事件,每个大鼠参与13例心脏骤停(IQR 7-23,最小1例,最大78例)。调整后的优势比表明,与没有RAT在场的几率相比,现场RAT与存活至30天的几率(OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.74-1.38)和到达医院时ROSC的几率(OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.99-1.29)略有增加相关,尽管这两个结果都没有统计学意义。结论RAT护理人员的存在与30天生存率和到达医院时ROSC的小幅增加有关,尽管两者均无统计学意义。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来确定诸如RAT之类的角色对OHCA结果的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信