Effect of Foundation Shape on Settlement by Numerical Method

Salfin Biswas, S. Ahammed
{"title":"Effect of Foundation Shape on Settlement by Numerical Method","authors":"Salfin Biswas, S. Ahammed","doi":"10.46610/jogs.2022.v07i03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Five prototypes arranged in three different soil conditions is presented to find out the load-settlement relationship of soil and foundation. For creating three types of condition two types of managed soils are stiff clay and soft clay. The five prototypes used here represent the condition of shallow foundation. Prototypes area being same for cases has the shape of Triangular, Square, Rectangular, Pentagonal and Hexagonal. The load-settlement behavior has been found out plan-wise using Plaxis 3D software. Geotechnical engineering software which uses finite element method and Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion following mathematical differential equational problems. Plaxis 3D software uses the properties of soil cohesion, angle of internal friction, Elasticity modulus and unit weight, elasticity modulus of the foundation to settle a relation for the interaction between soil and foundation. Load-settlement behavior for the five prototypes as tried to be found out by Plaxis 3D has represented the immediate settlement of soil on which the prototypes have been rested. The graphs also help to understand the difference in the bearing capacity and settlement for the five prototypes, each of which acted as foundations. Pressure bulb is an effect of vertical pressure which differs from shape to shape of foundation. It directly affects the intensity of pressure and the intensity of pressure affects the settlement. The bearing capacity also affects the settlement. A triangular foundation has the best bearing capacity as its settlement is the lowest. But as a triangular shaped foundation is not practically used and not ideal it is not used for structural work. This study shows that square or rectangular foundation is best for a structure due to higher bearing capacity and lesser settlement compared to the same of pentagonal and hexagonal shaped foundation. But if comparison is done between square and rectangular shaped foundation, square is the best.","PeriodicalId":338130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geotechnical Studies","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geotechnical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46610/jogs.2022.v07i03.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Five prototypes arranged in three different soil conditions is presented to find out the load-settlement relationship of soil and foundation. For creating three types of condition two types of managed soils are stiff clay and soft clay. The five prototypes used here represent the condition of shallow foundation. Prototypes area being same for cases has the shape of Triangular, Square, Rectangular, Pentagonal and Hexagonal. The load-settlement behavior has been found out plan-wise using Plaxis 3D software. Geotechnical engineering software which uses finite element method and Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion following mathematical differential equational problems. Plaxis 3D software uses the properties of soil cohesion, angle of internal friction, Elasticity modulus and unit weight, elasticity modulus of the foundation to settle a relation for the interaction between soil and foundation. Load-settlement behavior for the five prototypes as tried to be found out by Plaxis 3D has represented the immediate settlement of soil on which the prototypes have been rested. The graphs also help to understand the difference in the bearing capacity and settlement for the five prototypes, each of which acted as foundations. Pressure bulb is an effect of vertical pressure which differs from shape to shape of foundation. It directly affects the intensity of pressure and the intensity of pressure affects the settlement. The bearing capacity also affects the settlement. A triangular foundation has the best bearing capacity as its settlement is the lowest. But as a triangular shaped foundation is not practically used and not ideal it is not used for structural work. This study shows that square or rectangular foundation is best for a structure due to higher bearing capacity and lesser settlement compared to the same of pentagonal and hexagonal shaped foundation. But if comparison is done between square and rectangular shaped foundation, square is the best.
地基形状对沉降影响的数值计算
提出了布置在3种不同土质条件下的5个原型,探讨了地基与土的荷载沉降关系。为了创造三种类型的条件,两种类型的管理土壤是硬粘土和软粘土。这里使用的五个原型代表了浅基础的情况。原型区域相同的情况下,有三角形,方形,矩形,五边形和六边形的形状。利用Plaxis 3D软件对结构的荷载沉降特性进行了平面分析。岩土工程软件采用有限元法和Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则遵循数学微分方程问题。Plaxis 3D软件利用土的黏聚力、内摩擦角、弹性模量和地基的单位重量、弹性模量等特性来解决土与地基相互作用的关系。Plaxis 3D试图找出的五个原型的荷载沉降行为代表了原型所处土壤的直接沉降。这些图表还有助于理解五个原型的承载力和沉降的差异,每个原型都充当基础。压力球是一种垂直压力的效应,它随地基形状的不同而不同。它直接影响压力强度,压力强度影响沉降。承载能力对沉降也有影响。三角形地基沉降最小,承载能力最好。但由于三角形基础没有实际使用,也不理想,因此不用于结构工程。研究表明,与五边形和六边形基础相比,正方形或矩形基础具有更高的承载力和更小的沉降,是结构的最佳选择。但是如果在正方形和矩形基础之间进行比较,正方形是最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信