Reading the Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice

Friederike Schücking-Jungblut
{"title":"Reading the Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice","authors":"Friederike Schücking-Jungblut","doi":"10.1515/9783110639247-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading is a social mode of reception of a script-bearing artifact. Whereas by no means all writing was and is meant to be read,1 the scribal production and reproduction of literary compositions—in a broad sense—aimed and aim at being read. Dealing with ancient manuscripts that show literary compositions, two dimensions of reading come to mind: first, reading ancient manuscripts in a present-day scholarly perspective, and second, asking about the reading practices of the ancient readers. In the first context, one could evaluate the state of preservation of the manuscripts, the possibilities for reconstruction, the variances (“readings”) between different manuscripts, et cetera. In the second direction of research, one is asking about the modes of reception in the historical and social contexts from which the documents were produced. The first dimension is mainly the concern of editions of ancient manuscripts. Since the manuscripts of interest in this paper are all published in several editions from the last thirty years,2 I can focus on the second question, the ancient reading practices. But since reading—as most practices of reception—is a momentary act, that only rarely leaves marks in the manuscripts themselves, it is almost impossible to explore ancient modes of reading from the manuscripts that have been or can be assumed to have been read. What is accessible for research, however, are hints about intended modes of reading and reception in the documents themselves. Such hints might be found in the texts. However, codicological features of the manuscripts, for example, the choice of material, its preparation for the act of writing, and the design and the layout of the script can perhaps better shed light on the intended reading of the concrete document than the text itself.3 Along these lines, the present paper analyzes the manuscripts of the early Jewish Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice that were found among the Dead Sea Scrolls by considering not only the scholarly editions of the texts, but","PeriodicalId":414761,"journal":{"name":"Material Aspects of Reading in Ancient and Medieval Cultures","volume":"2012 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Material Aspects of Reading in Ancient and Medieval Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639247-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading is a social mode of reception of a script-bearing artifact. Whereas by no means all writing was and is meant to be read,1 the scribal production and reproduction of literary compositions—in a broad sense—aimed and aim at being read. Dealing with ancient manuscripts that show literary compositions, two dimensions of reading come to mind: first, reading ancient manuscripts in a present-day scholarly perspective, and second, asking about the reading practices of the ancient readers. In the first context, one could evaluate the state of preservation of the manuscripts, the possibilities for reconstruction, the variances (“readings”) between different manuscripts, et cetera. In the second direction of research, one is asking about the modes of reception in the historical and social contexts from which the documents were produced. The first dimension is mainly the concern of editions of ancient manuscripts. Since the manuscripts of interest in this paper are all published in several editions from the last thirty years,2 I can focus on the second question, the ancient reading practices. But since reading—as most practices of reception—is a momentary act, that only rarely leaves marks in the manuscripts themselves, it is almost impossible to explore ancient modes of reading from the manuscripts that have been or can be assumed to have been read. What is accessible for research, however, are hints about intended modes of reading and reception in the documents themselves. Such hints might be found in the texts. However, codicological features of the manuscripts, for example, the choice of material, its preparation for the act of writing, and the design and the layout of the script can perhaps better shed light on the intended reading of the concrete document than the text itself.3 Along these lines, the present paper analyzes the manuscripts of the early Jewish Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice that were found among the Dead Sea Scrolls by considering not only the scholarly editions of the texts, but
诵读安息日祭歌
阅读是接受带有文字的人工制品的一种社会模式。虽然并非所有的写作都是为了阅读,但从广义上讲,文学作品的抄写和复制是以阅读为目的的。面对展现文学作品的古代手抄本,阅读的两个维度浮现在脑海中:第一,以当今的学术视角阅读古代手抄本;第二,询问古代读者的阅读习惯。在第一种情况下,人们可以评估手稿的保存状况,重建的可能性,不同手稿之间的差异(“解读”)等等。在第二个研究方向上,人们正在询问在产生这些文件的历史和社会背景下的接受模式。第一个维度主要关注古代手稿的版本。由于本文所涉及的手稿都是近三十年来出版的几个版本,所以我可以专注于第二个问题,即古代的阅读方式。但是,由于阅读——正如大多数接受的实践一样——是一种短暂的行为,很少会在手稿上留下痕迹,因此几乎不可能从已经或可能被认为已经被阅读过的手稿中探索古代的阅读模式。然而,可供研究的是关于文件本身的预期阅读和接受模式的暗示。这些暗示可以在文本中找到。然而,手稿的法典特征,例如,材料的选择,写作行为的准备,以及脚本的设计和布局,可能比文本本身更能揭示具体文件的预期阅读沿着这些思路,本文分析了在死海古卷中发现的早期犹太安息日祭歌的手稿,不仅考虑了文本的学术版本,而且考虑了这些文本的学术版本
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信