Blockchain-based Credit and Arbitration Mechanisms in Crowdsourcing

Yuejiao Ding, Zhongyu Chen, Feilong Lin, Changbing Tang
{"title":"Blockchain-based Credit and Arbitration Mechanisms in Crowdsourcing","authors":"Yuejiao Ding, Zhongyu Chen, Feilong Lin, Changbing Tang","doi":"10.1109/ISASS.2019.8757776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowdsourcing is a distributed business service model brought by Internet. However, users always pursue the maximum benefits with the least effort, which may lead to the low quality of solutions submitted by receivers. In addition, each user is most concerned about their own benefits, and sometimes they do not objectively evaluate the solutions. Based on blockchain technology, this paper implements crowdsourcing process through smart contract, and proposes credit and arbitration mechanisms suitable for general online industrial services. To be specific, the credit mechanism defines the historical reputation of each user through credit score, which is beneficial for the sender to find a satisfactory receiver, and provides criteria for the selection of members of the arbitration institution. We also combine punishment and incentive measures to ensure the earnest implementation of the crowdsourcing business by users. Arbitration mechanism refers to the arbitration of task solutions submitted by receivers through the decentralized and credible arbitration institution rather than senders or the crowdsourcing platform, which ensures the fairness and impartiality of the solution evaluation. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed credit mechanism and arbitration mechanism.","PeriodicalId":359959,"journal":{"name":"2019 3rd International Symposium on Autonomous Systems (ISAS)","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 3rd International Symposium on Autonomous Systems (ISAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISASS.2019.8757776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Crowdsourcing is a distributed business service model brought by Internet. However, users always pursue the maximum benefits with the least effort, which may lead to the low quality of solutions submitted by receivers. In addition, each user is most concerned about their own benefits, and sometimes they do not objectively evaluate the solutions. Based on blockchain technology, this paper implements crowdsourcing process through smart contract, and proposes credit and arbitration mechanisms suitable for general online industrial services. To be specific, the credit mechanism defines the historical reputation of each user through credit score, which is beneficial for the sender to find a satisfactory receiver, and provides criteria for the selection of members of the arbitration institution. We also combine punishment and incentive measures to ensure the earnest implementation of the crowdsourcing business by users. Arbitration mechanism refers to the arbitration of task solutions submitted by receivers through the decentralized and credible arbitration institution rather than senders or the crowdsourcing platform, which ensures the fairness and impartiality of the solution evaluation. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed credit mechanism and arbitration mechanism.
众包中基于区块链的信用和仲裁机制
众包是互联网带来的一种分布式商业服务模式。然而,用户总是追求以最少的努力获得最大的利益,这可能导致接收方提交的解决方案质量不高。此外,每个用户最关心的是自己的利益,有时他们不会客观地评估解决方案。基于区块链技术,通过智能合约实现众包流程,提出适用于一般在线工业服务的信用和仲裁机制。具体而言,信用机制通过信用评分来定义每个用户的历史信誉,这有利于发送方找到满意的接收方,并为仲裁机构成员的选择提供标准。我们还将惩罚与激励相结合,确保用户认真执行众包业务。仲裁机制是指将接收方提交的任务方案通过去中心化、可信的仲裁机构进行仲裁,而不是通过发送方或众包平台进行仲裁,保证了方案评估的公平、公正。实验结果验证了所提出的信用机制和仲裁机制的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信