Rejoinder to Fegley and Dominiak on Property Rights and Gun Control

W. Block
{"title":"Rejoinder to Fegley and Dominiak on Property Rights and Gun Control","authors":"W. Block","doi":"10.35478/jime.2023.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fegley and Dominiak (2021) do not have a theory of gun rights, but they are adamant that the positions put forth by Block and Block (2000), and Rothbard (1998), are incorrect. The present paper is an attempt to defend the perspectives put forth on this important issue by the latter two publications, and to repudiate the criticisms of them articulated by the former. To wit, the view defended herein is that ownership and possession of nuclear weapons is a per se rights violation, and ought to be banned.","PeriodicalId":105833,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35478/jime.2023.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fegley and Dominiak (2021) do not have a theory of gun rights, but they are adamant that the positions put forth by Block and Block (2000), and Rothbard (1998), are incorrect. The present paper is an attempt to defend the perspectives put forth on this important issue by the latter two publications, and to repudiate the criticisms of them articulated by the former. To wit, the view defended herein is that ownership and possession of nuclear weapons is a per se rights violation, and ought to be banned.
对Fegley和Dominiak关于产权和枪支管制的答辩
Fegley和Dominiak(2021)没有枪支权利理论,但他们坚持认为Block and Block(2000)和Rothbard(1998)提出的立场是不正确的。本文试图捍卫后两篇出版物对这一重要问题提出的观点,并驳斥前者对它们的批评。也就是说,这里捍卫的观点是,拥有和拥有核武器本身就是对权利的侵犯,应该被禁止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书