QoS Measurement: A Comparative Study of Speeds and Latency for 5G Network Using Different Speed Test Applications for Mobile Phones

Therdpong Daengsi, Pana Ungkap, Phisit Pornpongtechavanich, Pongpisit Wuttidittachotti
{"title":"QoS Measurement: A Comparative Study of Speeds and Latency for 5G Network Using Different Speed Test Applications for Mobile Phones","authors":"Therdpong Daengsi, Pana Ungkap, Phisit Pornpongtechavanich, Pongpisit Wuttidittachotti","doi":"10.1109/ICSIMA50015.2021.9526296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a study using three popular speed test applications for mobile phones, including Speedtest, OpenSignal and nPerf. The study was designed to test the Quality of Service (QoS) parameters at the concourse level of 60 Skytrain stations in Bangkok, Thailand. By conducting the stationary tests with one major 5G network operator in the Thai market using these three applications, 180 records of data per application were collected. The results of download and upload speeds and latency were focused. The results from different applications reveal that the average values of speed and latency from each application are not the same. The download speeds obtained from Speedtest, OpenSignal and nPerf are 403.5 Mbpas, 326.4 Mbps and 291.6 Mbps respectively, while the upload speeds obtained from those applications are 97.2 Mbps, 83.4 Mbps and 183.9 Mbps respectively. Analysis using ANOVA and t-test was also conducted. This analysis shows significant differences among the download and upload speeds and latencies from these three applications, with p-values of less than 0.05. It can be concluded that QoS parameters measured by different applications tend to be different. Therefore, the average QoS results should be the average results from at least three applications for fairness and reliability.","PeriodicalId":404811,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA50015.2021.9526296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a study using three popular speed test applications for mobile phones, including Speedtest, OpenSignal and nPerf. The study was designed to test the Quality of Service (QoS) parameters at the concourse level of 60 Skytrain stations in Bangkok, Thailand. By conducting the stationary tests with one major 5G network operator in the Thai market using these three applications, 180 records of data per application were collected. The results of download and upload speeds and latency were focused. The results from different applications reveal that the average values of speed and latency from each application are not the same. The download speeds obtained from Speedtest, OpenSignal and nPerf are 403.5 Mbpas, 326.4 Mbps and 291.6 Mbps respectively, while the upload speeds obtained from those applications are 97.2 Mbps, 83.4 Mbps and 183.9 Mbps respectively. Analysis using ANOVA and t-test was also conducted. This analysis shows significant differences among the download and upload speeds and latencies from these three applications, with p-values of less than 0.05. It can be concluded that QoS parameters measured by different applications tend to be different. Therefore, the average QoS results should be the average results from at least three applications for fairness and reliability.
QoS测量:不同手机速度测试应用对5G网络速度和延迟的比较研究
本文介绍了一项研究,使用三种流行的手机速度测试应用程序,包括Speedtest, OpenSignal和nPerf。本研究旨在测试泰国曼谷60个轻轨站大厅层的服务质量(QoS)参数。通过使用这三种应用程序与泰国市场的一家主要5G网络运营商进行固定测试,每个应用程序收集了180条数据记录。下载和上传速度和延迟的结果是集中的。不同应用程序的结果表明,每个应用程序的速度和延迟的平均值是不一样的。从Speedtest、OpenSignal和nPerf获得的下载速度分别为403.5 Mbps、326.4 Mbps和291.6 Mbps,而从这些应用程序获得的上传速度分别为97.2 Mbps、83.4 Mbps和183.9 Mbps。采用方差分析和t检验进行分析。该分析显示,这三种应用程序的下载和上传速度和延迟之间存在显著差异,p值小于0.05。可以看出,不同应用测量的QoS参数往往不同。因此,为了公平和可靠性,平均QoS结果应该是至少三个应用程序的平均结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信