AI 2.0: Augmented Intelligence

P. Lisboa
{"title":"AI 2.0: Augmented Intelligence","authors":"P. Lisboa","doi":"10.1142/9789813273238_0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational intelligence (CI) models are often evaluated on the basis of predictive performance, lacking appropriate consideration of other aspects which might make a claim to the intelligence of the model and which can be critical for their use by a subject expert who is not a CI expert. Yet appearances can be deceiving, especially with summary performance measures e.g. AUROC. This is especially the case for non-linear models given their ability to exploit any weaknesses in the data, for instance structural artefacts which can add confounding effects. In addition, many applied CI models work well for well classified cases but cannot explain predictions for borderline cases. In other words, they confirm to expert users what they already know but do not add insights to the data in the difficult cases for which CI is most needed. There is a drive for the use of CI to complement rather than automate decision making This is fundamental to make CI useful in practice and has been termed Augmented Intelligence, or AI 2.0. The talk will illustrate some of the pitfalls in the design and validation of databased models. It will then describe how rules can be efficiently derived from neural networks so openi ng the black-box. An alternative and popular way of presenting and using complex models e.g. to clinicians, is the use of nomograms. They will be derived from SVMs so extending this graphical approach to non-linear models. Finally, the concept of case-based reasoning will be explored using information geometry to calculate similarity metrics directly to identify patients-like-mine with reference to specific clinical queries e.g. diagnosis or prognosis. This comprises a statistically principled intelligent query system for case-based reasoning, enabling a subject expert to diagnose probabilistic classifiers with respect to patient cohorts where there are significantly more or fewer cases of interest, separating them from mixed groups for whom more information is certain to be required. This provides a direct route to interpretation and a way for subject experts to access generic non-linear models as a smart approach to data retrieval, complementing the numerical outputs.","PeriodicalId":259425,"journal":{"name":"Data Science and Knowledge Engineering for Sensing Decision Support","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Science and Knowledge Engineering for Sensing Decision Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813273238_0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Computational intelligence (CI) models are often evaluated on the basis of predictive performance, lacking appropriate consideration of other aspects which might make a claim to the intelligence of the model and which can be critical for their use by a subject expert who is not a CI expert. Yet appearances can be deceiving, especially with summary performance measures e.g. AUROC. This is especially the case for non-linear models given their ability to exploit any weaknesses in the data, for instance structural artefacts which can add confounding effects. In addition, many applied CI models work well for well classified cases but cannot explain predictions for borderline cases. In other words, they confirm to expert users what they already know but do not add insights to the data in the difficult cases for which CI is most needed. There is a drive for the use of CI to complement rather than automate decision making This is fundamental to make CI useful in practice and has been termed Augmented Intelligence, or AI 2.0. The talk will illustrate some of the pitfalls in the design and validation of databased models. It will then describe how rules can be efficiently derived from neural networks so openi ng the black-box. An alternative and popular way of presenting and using complex models e.g. to clinicians, is the use of nomograms. They will be derived from SVMs so extending this graphical approach to non-linear models. Finally, the concept of case-based reasoning will be explored using information geometry to calculate similarity metrics directly to identify patients-like-mine with reference to specific clinical queries e.g. diagnosis or prognosis. This comprises a statistically principled intelligent query system for case-based reasoning, enabling a subject expert to diagnose probabilistic classifiers with respect to patient cohorts where there are significantly more or fewer cases of interest, separating them from mixed groups for whom more information is certain to be required. This provides a direct route to interpretation and a way for subject experts to access generic non-linear models as a smart approach to data retrieval, complementing the numerical outputs.
AI 2.0:增强智能
计算智能(CI)模型通常在预测性能的基础上进行评估,缺乏对其他方面的适当考虑,这些方面可能对模型的智能提出要求,并且对于非CI专家的主题专家使用它们至关重要。然而,表象可能具有欺骗性,尤其是对于AUROC等总结性绩效指标。这对于非线性模型来说尤其如此,因为它们有能力利用数据中的任何弱点,例如可能增加混淆效应的结构人工制品。此外,许多应用CI模型对分类良好的案例工作得很好,但不能解释对边缘案例的预测。换句话说,它们向专家用户确认了他们已经知道的东西,但没有在最需要CI的困难情况下为数据添加见解。有一种使用CI来补充而不是自动化决策的动力,这是使CI在实践中有用的基础,被称为增强智能,或AI 2.0。这次演讲将说明在数据库模型的设计和验证中的一些陷阱。然后,它将描述如何有效地从神经网络中导出规则,从而打开黑箱。另一种流行的呈现和使用复杂模型的方法,如临床医生,是使用图。它们将从支持向量机派生,从而将这种图形方法扩展到非线性模型。最后,将探讨基于案例推理的概念,使用信息几何来直接计算相似度量,以参考特定的临床查询(例如诊断或预后)来识别像我这样的患者。这包括一个基于案例推理的统计原则智能查询系统,使主题专家能够诊断关于患者队列的概率分类器,其中有更多或更少的感兴趣的病例,将它们从混合组中分离出来,这些混合组肯定需要更多的信息。这为解释提供了一条直接途径,也为学科专家提供了一种访问通用非线性模型的方法,作为数据检索的一种智能方法,补充了数值输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信