Osmanlı Toplumunda “Ahlaksızlar”: Ondokuzuncu Yüzyıl Sonunda Osmanlı Ahlak Söyleminin Jeneolojisi

S. Mustafa
{"title":"Osmanlı Toplumunda “Ahlaksızlar”: Ondokuzuncu Yüzyıl Sonunda Osmanlı Ahlak Söyleminin Jeneolojisi","authors":"S. Mustafa","doi":"10.55796/dusuncevetoplum.1127356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Tanzimat edict the Ottoman state started to adopt a liberal governmental rationality similar to the Western states. According to Foucault, government refers to “the conduct of conduct” and governmentality is state’s use of modern and rational governmental techniques for conducting the acts of individuals and populations. At the turn of the century, the Ottoman state, which had increased its administrative modernization and centralization, became responsible for public security and order. The state apparatus provided this public order by reproducing the traditional morality of the neighborhood in the state discourse of governmentality. In other words, the moral discourse of the neighborhood was juxtaposed with the citizen-based liberal administrative discourse that responded to public safety, public health and the lower demands of the citizens. Presenting the genealogy of moral discourse in the late Ottoman society, this study shows that the moral regime in the premodern Ottoman neighborhood is combined with the modern administrative discourse focused on “good governance” that serves the safety and well-being of society and citizens (i.e., populations and the individuals in them, respectively).","PeriodicalId":128518,"journal":{"name":"Düşünce ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Düşünce ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55796/dusuncevetoplum.1127356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the Tanzimat edict the Ottoman state started to adopt a liberal governmental rationality similar to the Western states. According to Foucault, government refers to “the conduct of conduct” and governmentality is state’s use of modern and rational governmental techniques for conducting the acts of individuals and populations. At the turn of the century, the Ottoman state, which had increased its administrative modernization and centralization, became responsible for public security and order. The state apparatus provided this public order by reproducing the traditional morality of the neighborhood in the state discourse of governmentality. In other words, the moral discourse of the neighborhood was juxtaposed with the citizen-based liberal administrative discourse that responded to public safety, public health and the lower demands of the citizens. Presenting the genealogy of moral discourse in the late Ottoman society, this study shows that the moral regime in the premodern Ottoman neighborhood is combined with the modern administrative discourse focused on “good governance” that serves the safety and well-being of society and citizens (i.e., populations and the individuals in them, respectively).
自从Tanzimat法令之后,奥斯曼帝国开始采取一种类似于西方国家的自由主义政府理性。在福柯看来,政府指的是“行为的行为”,治理是国家运用现代的、合理的治理技术来指导个人和群体的行为。在世纪之交,加强了行政现代化和中央集权的奥斯曼帝国开始负责公共安全与秩序。国家机器通过在治理的国家话语中再现传统的邻里道德来提供这种公共秩序。换句话说,社区的道德话语与以公民为基础的自由行政话语并列,后者回应了公共安全、公共卫生和公民的较低要求。本研究呈现了晚期奥斯曼社会道德话语的谱系,表明前现代奥斯曼社区的道德制度与现代行政话语相结合,这些话语侧重于“善治”,服务于社会和公民(分别是人口和其中的个人)的安全和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信