Decision-making capabilities of a hybrid system applied to the auditor's going-concern assessment

M. Lenard, Pervaiz Alam, David E. Booth, G. Madey
{"title":"Decision-making capabilities of a hybrid system applied to the auditor's going-concern assessment","authors":"M. Lenard, Pervaiz Alam, David E. Booth, G. Madey","doi":"10.1002/isaf.190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to evaluate a hybrid system as a decision support model to assist with the auditor's going-concern assessment. The going-concern assessment is often an unstructured decision that involves the use of both qualitative and quantitative information. An expert system that predicts the going-concern decision has been developed in consultation with partners at three of the Big Five accounting firms. This system is combined with a statistical model that predicts bankruptcy, as a component of the auditor's decision, to form a hybrid system. The hybrid system, because it combines the use of quantitative and qualitative information, has the potential for better prediction accuracy than either the expert system or statistical model predicting separately. In addition, testing of the system provides some insight into the characteristics of firms that experience problems, but do not necessarily receive a going-concern modification. Further investigation into those firms that have problems could reveal factors that may be incorporated into decision support systems for auditors, in order to improve accuracy and reliability of these decision tools. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":153549,"journal":{"name":"Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag.","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a hybrid system as a decision support model to assist with the auditor's going-concern assessment. The going-concern assessment is often an unstructured decision that involves the use of both qualitative and quantitative information. An expert system that predicts the going-concern decision has been developed in consultation with partners at three of the Big Five accounting firms. This system is combined with a statistical model that predicts bankruptcy, as a component of the auditor's decision, to form a hybrid system. The hybrid system, because it combines the use of quantitative and qualitative information, has the potential for better prediction accuracy than either the expert system or statistical model predicting separately. In addition, testing of the system provides some insight into the characteristics of firms that experience problems, but do not necessarily receive a going-concern modification. Further investigation into those firms that have problems could reveal factors that may be incorporated into decision support systems for auditors, in order to improve accuracy and reliability of these decision tools. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
应用于审计师持续经营评估的混合系统的决策能力
本研究的目的是评估一个混合系统作为决策支持模型,以协助审计师的持续经营评估。持续经营评估通常是一种非结构化的决策,涉及使用定性和定量信息。在与五大会计师事务所中的三家的合伙人协商后,开发了一个预测持续经营决策的专家系统。该系统与预测破产的统计模型相结合,作为审计决策的一个组成部分,形成一个混合系统。混合系统,因为它结合了定量和定性信息的使用,具有比单独预测的专家系统或统计模型更好的预测精度的潜力。此外,对该系统的测试提供了对遇到问题但不一定得到持续经营修改的公司特征的一些见解。对这些有问题的公司进行进一步调查,可以揭示可纳入审计员决策支持系统的因素,以提高这些决策工具的准确性和可靠性。©2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信