Temperature Distribution and Thermal Dosage Affected by Nanoparticle Distribution in Tumours During Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia

Manpreet Singh, Qimei Gu, Ronghui Ma, Liang Zhu
{"title":"Temperature Distribution and Thermal Dosage Affected by Nanoparticle Distribution in Tumours During Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia","authors":"Manpreet Singh, Qimei Gu, Ronghui Ma, Liang Zhu","doi":"10.1115/mnhmt2019-4233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent microCT imaging study has demonstrated that local heating caused a much larger nanoparticle distribution volume in tumors than that in tumors without localized heating, suggesting possible nanoparticle redistribution/migration during heating. In this study, a theoretical simulation is performed to evaluate to what extent the nanoparticle redistribution affects the temperature elevations and thermal dosage required to cause permanent thermal damage to PC3 tumors. Two tumor groups with similar sizes are selected. The control group consists of five PC3 tumors with nanoparticles distribution without heating, while the experimental group consists of another five resected PC3 tumors with nanoparticles distribution obtained after 25 minutes of local heating. Each generated tumor model is attached to a mouse body model by microCT scans. A previously determined relationship between the nanoparticle concentration distribution and the volumetric heat generation rate is implemented in the theoretical simulation of temperature elevations during magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia. Our simulation results show that the average steady state temperature elevation in the tumors of the control group is higher than that in the experimental group when the nanoparticles are more spreading from the tumor center to tumor periphery (control group: 64.03±3.2°C vs. experimental group: 62.04±3.07°C). Further we assess the thermal dosage needed to cause 100% permanent thermal damage (Arrhenius integral Ω = 4) to the entire tumor, based on the assumption of unchanged nanoparticle distribution during heating. The average heating time based on the experimental setting from our previous studies demonstrates significantly different designs. Specifically, the average heating time for the control group is 24.3 minutes. However, the more spreading of nanoparticles to tumor periphery in the experimental group results in a much longer heating time of 38.1 minutes, 57° longer than that in the control group, to induce permanent thermal damage to the entire tumor. The results from this study suggest that the heating time needed when considering dynamic nanoparticle migration during heating is probably between 24 to 38 minutes. In conclusion, the study demonstrates the importance of including dynamic nanoparticle spreading during heating into theoretical simulation of temperature elevations in tumors to determine accurate thermal dosage needed in magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia design.","PeriodicalId":331854,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2019 6th International Conference on Micro/Nanoscale Heat and Mass Transfer","volume":" 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2019 6th International Conference on Micro/Nanoscale Heat and Mass Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/mnhmt2019-4233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Recent microCT imaging study has demonstrated that local heating caused a much larger nanoparticle distribution volume in tumors than that in tumors without localized heating, suggesting possible nanoparticle redistribution/migration during heating. In this study, a theoretical simulation is performed to evaluate to what extent the nanoparticle redistribution affects the temperature elevations and thermal dosage required to cause permanent thermal damage to PC3 tumors. Two tumor groups with similar sizes are selected. The control group consists of five PC3 tumors with nanoparticles distribution without heating, while the experimental group consists of another five resected PC3 tumors with nanoparticles distribution obtained after 25 minutes of local heating. Each generated tumor model is attached to a mouse body model by microCT scans. A previously determined relationship between the nanoparticle concentration distribution and the volumetric heat generation rate is implemented in the theoretical simulation of temperature elevations during magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia. Our simulation results show that the average steady state temperature elevation in the tumors of the control group is higher than that in the experimental group when the nanoparticles are more spreading from the tumor center to tumor periphery (control group: 64.03±3.2°C vs. experimental group: 62.04±3.07°C). Further we assess the thermal dosage needed to cause 100% permanent thermal damage (Arrhenius integral Ω = 4) to the entire tumor, based on the assumption of unchanged nanoparticle distribution during heating. The average heating time based on the experimental setting from our previous studies demonstrates significantly different designs. Specifically, the average heating time for the control group is 24.3 minutes. However, the more spreading of nanoparticles to tumor periphery in the experimental group results in a much longer heating time of 38.1 minutes, 57° longer than that in the control group, to induce permanent thermal damage to the entire tumor. The results from this study suggest that the heating time needed when considering dynamic nanoparticle migration during heating is probably between 24 to 38 minutes. In conclusion, the study demonstrates the importance of including dynamic nanoparticle spreading during heating into theoretical simulation of temperature elevations in tumors to determine accurate thermal dosage needed in magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia design.
磁性纳米粒子热疗过程中肿瘤内纳米粒子分布对温度分布和热剂量的影响
最近的微ct成像研究表明,局部加热导致肿瘤中纳米颗粒的分布体积比局部加热时大得多,这表明加热过程中可能存在纳米颗粒的重新分布/迁移。在本研究中,进行了理论模拟,以评估纳米颗粒再分配对PC3肿瘤造成永久性热损伤所需的温度升高和热剂量的影响程度。选择大小相近的两组肿瘤。对照组为5个未加热的具有纳米颗粒分布的PC3肿瘤,实验组为另外5个切除的PC3肿瘤,局部加热25分钟后获得纳米颗粒分布。每个生成的肿瘤模型通过微ct扫描附着在小鼠身体模型上。在磁性纳米颗粒热疗期间温度升高的理论模拟中,实现了先前确定的纳米颗粒浓度分布与体积产热率之间的关系。我们的模拟结果表明,当纳米颗粒从肿瘤中心向肿瘤周围扩散更多时,对照组肿瘤内的平均稳态温度升高高于实验组(对照组:64.03±3.2℃,实验组:62.04±3.07℃)。我们进一步评估了在加热过程中纳米颗粒分布不变的假设下,对整个肿瘤造成100%永久性热损伤所需的热剂量(Arrhenius积分Ω = 4)。基于我们先前研究的实验设置的平均加热时间显示出明显不同的设计。具体来说,对照组的平均加热时间为24.3分钟。然而,实验组纳米颗粒向肿瘤外周扩散的越多,加热时间也就越长,达到38.1分钟,比对照组长57°,从而对整个肿瘤造成永久性热损伤。本研究结果表明,在加热过程中考虑纳米颗粒动态迁移所需的加热时间可能在24至38分钟之间。总之,该研究证明了将纳米颗粒在加热过程中的动态扩散纳入肿瘤温度升高的理论模拟,以确定磁性纳米颗粒热疗设计所需的准确热剂量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信