The Contradiction Between Culinary Innovation Research and Gastro Tourism Practice

H. Fisher, G. D. du Rand
{"title":"The Contradiction Between Culinary Innovation Research and Gastro Tourism Practice","authors":"H. Fisher, G. D. du Rand","doi":"10.34190/ictr.6.1.1307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This historical review explores a descriptive-informative overview of cuisine as a component of gastro-tourism and travel. The paper reports on contemporary culinary innovation offerings in a South African context, analysing the links – or absence thereof – between academia and the gastro-tourism industry, to illustrate the ambiguity between research and practice in culinary innovation and its effects on the gastro-tourism industry. The qualitative methodology employed was informed by the historically oriented systematic literature review process.  This was guided by a structured approach to determine relevant source material that would be useful for the historical literature review purpose. Evidence searches for literature from various sources such as scholarly journals and professional magazines, grey literature and personal reviews within the industry were undertaken. The examples in this paper highlight the potential unstructured innovation taking place within the South African food service environment without supported evidence from academic research. Role-players in both research and the gastro-tourism fields could apply properly researched food heritage and gastro-nationalism interventions to draw tourists and allow them to experience innovative use of local indigenous produce and food heritage innovations. Examples include Wild Peach (Landolphia kirkii) or Sand Apricot Vine (Umkuzi in Zulu) fruit leather disk covering a cheese and fruit plate, or swirls of fruit leather used to decorate a carrot and Marula Bundt cake, made from bright Umnumbela or Transvaal Milk-plum purée, and Marula (Sclerocarya birrea) pulp in the carrot cake batter. The research highlights the limited available data, to establish a viable link between academia and the gastro-tourism industry. Despite this limitation, the paper foregrounds the efforts being made towards culinary innovation within the South African culinary industry. Simultaneously it also illustrates the originality of this research and the importance of improved collaboration.","PeriodicalId":413105,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Tourism Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Tourism Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ictr.6.1.1307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This historical review explores a descriptive-informative overview of cuisine as a component of gastro-tourism and travel. The paper reports on contemporary culinary innovation offerings in a South African context, analysing the links – or absence thereof – between academia and the gastro-tourism industry, to illustrate the ambiguity between research and practice in culinary innovation and its effects on the gastro-tourism industry. The qualitative methodology employed was informed by the historically oriented systematic literature review process.  This was guided by a structured approach to determine relevant source material that would be useful for the historical literature review purpose. Evidence searches for literature from various sources such as scholarly journals and professional magazines, grey literature and personal reviews within the industry were undertaken. The examples in this paper highlight the potential unstructured innovation taking place within the South African food service environment without supported evidence from academic research. Role-players in both research and the gastro-tourism fields could apply properly researched food heritage and gastro-nationalism interventions to draw tourists and allow them to experience innovative use of local indigenous produce and food heritage innovations. Examples include Wild Peach (Landolphia kirkii) or Sand Apricot Vine (Umkuzi in Zulu) fruit leather disk covering a cheese and fruit plate, or swirls of fruit leather used to decorate a carrot and Marula Bundt cake, made from bright Umnumbela or Transvaal Milk-plum purée, and Marula (Sclerocarya birrea) pulp in the carrot cake batter. The research highlights the limited available data, to establish a viable link between academia and the gastro-tourism industry. Despite this limitation, the paper foregrounds the efforts being made towards culinary innovation within the South African culinary industry. Simultaneously it also illustrates the originality of this research and the importance of improved collaboration.
烹饪创新研究与美食旅游实践的矛盾
这篇历史评论探讨了作为美食旅游和旅行组成部分的美食的描述性信息概述。本文在南非的背景下报告了当代烹饪创新产品,分析了学术界与美食旅游业之间的联系(或缺乏联系),以说明烹饪创新的研究与实践及其对美食旅游业的影响之间的模糊性。所采用的定性方法是通过以历史为导向的系统文献回顾过程。这是由一个结构化的方法来确定相关的源材料,将有助于历史文献综述的目的指导。从学术期刊和专业杂志、灰色文献和行业内的个人评论等各种来源进行文献证据检索。本文中的例子突出了南非食品服务环境中发生的潜在非结构化创新,而没有学术研究的支持证据。研究和美食旅游领域的角色参与者可以适当地应用研究过的食物遗产和美食民族主义干预措施来吸引游客,并让他们体验对当地土着农产品的创新使用和食物遗产的创新。例如,野桃(Landolphia kirkii)或沙杏藤(祖鲁语的Umkuzi)水果皮盘覆盖在奶酪和水果盘上,或者用来装饰胡萝卜和马鲁拉蛋糕的水果皮漩涡,由鲜亮的Umnumbela或德兰士瓦牛奶梅pursame和胡萝卜蛋糕面糊中的马鲁拉(Sclerocarya birrea)果肉制成。该研究强调了有限的可用数据,以建立学术界和美食旅游业之间的可行联系。尽管有这种限制,论文前景正在朝着南非烹饪行业内的烹饪创新的努力。同时,它也说明了这项研究的独创性和改进合作的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信