Determining the semantic orientation of opinion words using typed dependencies for opinion word senses and SentiWordNet scores from online product reviews

K. R. Kumar, D. T. Santosh, B. V. Vardhan
{"title":"Determining the semantic orientation of opinion words using typed dependencies for opinion word senses and SentiWordNet scores from online product reviews","authors":"K. R. Kumar, D. T. Santosh, B. V. Vardhan","doi":"10.1504/IJKWI.2017.10010171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opinion words express the information regarding the like and dislike of a user on the target entities such as products and product aspects present in the online reviews. The polarised information collected from the reviews is analysed by calculating the orientation of the adjectives. The synonymy relation graph is a way to determine the orientation of the adjectives present in the product reviews dataset. It considers the minimum path length between the adjectives under analysis using WordNet synsets. The synonymy relation graph cannot determine the orientations of all the opinion words present in the dataset. In order to evaluate opinion orientation of all the adjectives from the dataset, the synonymy relation graph of WordNet is to be replaced with the SentiWordNet scores of the opinion words. These scores are provided to the opinion words by finding the contextual clues surrounding the opinion words to disambiguate their sense. The contextual clues are finalised based on the typed dependencies grammatical relations. The distance between the opinion word and the context insensitive seed term (good/bad) is computed by calculating the difference between these scores. This paper addresses advantages of using SentiWordNet scores. This improves the accuracy of the determined opinion word orientations.","PeriodicalId":113936,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Knowl. Web Intell.","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Knowl. Web Intell.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKWI.2017.10010171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Opinion words express the information regarding the like and dislike of a user on the target entities such as products and product aspects present in the online reviews. The polarised information collected from the reviews is analysed by calculating the orientation of the adjectives. The synonymy relation graph is a way to determine the orientation of the adjectives present in the product reviews dataset. It considers the minimum path length between the adjectives under analysis using WordNet synsets. The synonymy relation graph cannot determine the orientations of all the opinion words present in the dataset. In order to evaluate opinion orientation of all the adjectives from the dataset, the synonymy relation graph of WordNet is to be replaced with the SentiWordNet scores of the opinion words. These scores are provided to the opinion words by finding the contextual clues surrounding the opinion words to disambiguate their sense. The contextual clues are finalised based on the typed dependencies grammatical relations. The distance between the opinion word and the context insensitive seed term (good/bad) is computed by calculating the difference between these scores. This paper addresses advantages of using SentiWordNet scores. This improves the accuracy of the determined opinion word orientations.
使用在线产品评论的意见词感官和SentiWordNet评分的类型依赖关系来确定意见词的语义取向
意见词表达了用户对目标实体(如在线评论中的产品和产品方面)的喜欢和不喜欢的信息。通过计算形容词的倾向性来分析从评论中收集到的两极化信息。同义词关系图是确定产品评论数据集中出现的形容词方向的一种方法。它考虑使用WordNet同义词集分析的形容词之间的最小路径长度。同义词关系图不能确定数据集中存在的所有意见词的方向。为了评价数据集中所有形容词的意见倾向,将WordNet的同义词关系图替换为意见词的SentiWordNet分数。这些分数是通过寻找围绕意见词的上下文线索来消除其意义的歧义来提供给意见词的。上下文线索是基于类型依赖语法关系来确定的。通过计算这些分数之间的差值来计算意见词和上下文不敏感的种子词(好/坏)之间的距离。本文论述了使用SentiWordNet评分的优点。这提高了确定意见词方向的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信