Abstracts of Current Literature

W. Doolin, S. H, V. M. Synge
{"title":"Abstracts of Current Literature","authors":"W. Doolin, S. H, V. M. Synge","doi":"10.1179/106698102790819049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"S OF CURRENT LITERATURE The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Vol. 10 No. 4 (2002), 226 227 Hoving, JL; Koes, BW; de Vet, HC; van der Windt, DA; Assendelft, WJ; van Mameren H, Deville WL; Pool, JJ; Scholten, RJ; Bouter, LM Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain. A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 136(10):713-22, 2002 May 21. BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common problem, but the effectiveness of frequently applied conservative therapies has never been directly compared. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of manual therapy, physical therapy, and continued care by a general practitioner. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient care setting in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 183 patients, 18 to 70 years of age, who had had nonspecific neck pain for at least 2 weeks. INTERVENTION: 6 weeks of manual therapy (specific mobilization techniques) once per week, physical therapy (exercise therapy) twice per week, or continued care by a general practitioner (analgesics, counseling, and education). MEASUREMENTS: Treatment was considered successful if the patient reported being \"completely recovered\" or \"much improved\" on an ordinal sixpoint scale. Physical dysfunction, pain intensity, and disability were also measured. RESULTS: At 7 weeks, the success rates were 68.3% for manual therapy, 50.8% for physical therapy, and 35.9% for continued care. Statistically significant differences in pain intensity with manual therapy compared with continued care or physical therapy ranged from 0.9 to 1.5 on a scale of 0 to 10. Disability scores also favored manual therapy, but the differences among groups were small. Manual therapy scored consistently better than the other two interventions on most outcome measures. Physical therapy scored better than continued care on some outcome measures, but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In daily practice, manual therapy is a favorable treatment option for patients with neck pain compared with physical therapy or continued care by a general practitioner. Berth, A; Urbach, D; Awiszus, F Improvement of voluntary quadriceps muscle activation after total knee arthroplasty. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 83(10):14326, 2002 Oct. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force and the voluntary activation of the quadriceps femoris muscle in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DESIGN: A prospective intervention study. SETTING: University hospital clinic in Germany. PATIENTS: Fifty patients (32 women, 18 men; mean age ± standard deviation, 65.8+/-5.6 y) with knee OA and 23 healthy ageand gender-matched control subjects. INTERVENTION: Unilateral TKA without patella resurfacing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Voluntary activation, MVC, and true maximal contraction forces of the bilateral quadriceps femoris muscles, using the twitch interpolation technique before and 33+/-8 months after TKA. Assessment of postoperative knee pain by the Lewis score. RESULTS: Voluntary activation increased bilaterally after surgery (P<.01 operated side, P=.02 nonoperated side) but remained lower than the voluntary activation of the controls. MVC (P<.001) and true maximal contraction forces (P=.01) increased significantly on the operated side. MVC remained unchanged (P=.45), and true maximal contraction forces decreased significantly (P=.04) on the nonoperated side. CONCLUSION: Patients with knee OA have significant bilateral voluntary activation deficits that are, at least in part, reversible within 3 years after TKA. Rehabilitation programs immediately after TKA should focus on reduction of voluntary activation deficits. After voluntary activation improves, physical therapy should target the augmentation of quadriceps femoris muscle strength. 226 / The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2002","PeriodicalId":146369,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science (1922-1925)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science (1922-1925)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/106698102790819049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

S OF CURRENT LITERATURE The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Vol. 10 No. 4 (2002), 226 227 Hoving, JL; Koes, BW; de Vet, HC; van der Windt, DA; Assendelft, WJ; van Mameren H, Deville WL; Pool, JJ; Scholten, RJ; Bouter, LM Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain. A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 136(10):713-22, 2002 May 21. BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common problem, but the effectiveness of frequently applied conservative therapies has never been directly compared. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of manual therapy, physical therapy, and continued care by a general practitioner. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient care setting in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 183 patients, 18 to 70 years of age, who had had nonspecific neck pain for at least 2 weeks. INTERVENTION: 6 weeks of manual therapy (specific mobilization techniques) once per week, physical therapy (exercise therapy) twice per week, or continued care by a general practitioner (analgesics, counseling, and education). MEASUREMENTS: Treatment was considered successful if the patient reported being "completely recovered" or "much improved" on an ordinal sixpoint scale. Physical dysfunction, pain intensity, and disability were also measured. RESULTS: At 7 weeks, the success rates were 68.3% for manual therapy, 50.8% for physical therapy, and 35.9% for continued care. Statistically significant differences in pain intensity with manual therapy compared with continued care or physical therapy ranged from 0.9 to 1.5 on a scale of 0 to 10. Disability scores also favored manual therapy, but the differences among groups were small. Manual therapy scored consistently better than the other two interventions on most outcome measures. Physical therapy scored better than continued care on some outcome measures, but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In daily practice, manual therapy is a favorable treatment option for patients with neck pain compared with physical therapy or continued care by a general practitioner. Berth, A; Urbach, D; Awiszus, F Improvement of voluntary quadriceps muscle activation after total knee arthroplasty. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 83(10):14326, 2002 Oct. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force and the voluntary activation of the quadriceps femoris muscle in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DESIGN: A prospective intervention study. SETTING: University hospital clinic in Germany. PATIENTS: Fifty patients (32 women, 18 men; mean age ± standard deviation, 65.8+/-5.6 y) with knee OA and 23 healthy ageand gender-matched control subjects. INTERVENTION: Unilateral TKA without patella resurfacing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Voluntary activation, MVC, and true maximal contraction forces of the bilateral quadriceps femoris muscles, using the twitch interpolation technique before and 33+/-8 months after TKA. Assessment of postoperative knee pain by the Lewis score. RESULTS: Voluntary activation increased bilaterally after surgery (P<.01 operated side, P=.02 nonoperated side) but remained lower than the voluntary activation of the controls. MVC (P<.001) and true maximal contraction forces (P=.01) increased significantly on the operated side. MVC remained unchanged (P=.45), and true maximal contraction forces decreased significantly (P=.04) on the nonoperated side. CONCLUSION: Patients with knee OA have significant bilateral voluntary activation deficits that are, at least in part, reversible within 3 years after TKA. Rehabilitation programs immediately after TKA should focus on reduction of voluntary activation deficits. After voluntary activation improves, physical therapy should target the augmentation of quadriceps femoris muscle strength. 226 / The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2002
当代文献摘要
《手法与手法治疗杂志》Vol. 10 No. 4 (2002), 226 - 227 Hoving, JL;ko, BW;de Vet, HC;范德温特,DA;Assendelft WJ;van Mameren H, Deville WL;池,JJ;Scholten RJ;手工治疗,物理治疗,或由全科医生继续护理颈部疼痛的患者。随机对照试验。内科医学年鉴。136(10):713-22,2002年5月21日。背景:颈部疼痛是一个常见的问题,但经常应用的保守疗法的有效性从未被直接比较过。目的:确定手工治疗、物理治疗和全科医生持续护理的有效性。设计:随机对照试验。环境:在荷兰的门诊护理环境。患者:183例患者,年龄18 ~ 70岁,非特异性颈部疼痛至少2周。干预:每周1次的6周手工治疗(特定活动技术),每周2次的物理治疗(运动治疗),或由全科医生继续护理(止痛、咨询和教育)。测量:如果患者报告“完全恢复”或“明显改善”,则认为治疗成功。还测量了身体功能障碍、疼痛强度和残疾。结果:7周时,手工治疗的成功率为68.3%,物理治疗的成功率为50.8%,继续治疗的成功率为35.9%。与继续护理或物理治疗相比,手工治疗的疼痛强度在0到10的范围内的统计学差异在0.9到1.5之间。残疾得分也倾向于手工治疗,但各组之间的差异很小。在大多数结果测量中,手工疗法的得分始终优于其他两种干预措施。在一些结果测量中,物理治疗的得分高于继续护理,但差异没有统计学意义。结论:在日常实践中,与物理治疗或全科医生的持续护理相比,手工治疗是颈部疼痛患者较好的治疗选择。一个泊位;Urbach D;全膝关节置换术后随意股四头肌活动的改善。目的:评价膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)患者全膝关节置换术(TKA)前后股骨股四头肌的最大自主收缩力(MVC)和自主活动。设计:前瞻性干预研究。地点:德国大学医院诊所。患者:50例(女32例,男18例;平均年龄±标准差,65.8+/-5.6 y), 23名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组。干预:单侧TKA,不髌骨置换。主要观察指标:TKA前和TKA后33+/-8个月,使用抽搐插值技术,自主激活、MVC和双侧股四头肌的真正最大收缩力。用Lewis评分评估术后膝关节疼痛。结果:手术后双侧自愿活动增加(P< 0.05)。01手术侧,P=。(2)非手术侧),但仍低于自愿激活对照组。手术侧的MVC (P< 0.001)和真最大收缩力(P= 0.01)显著增加。MVC保持不变(P= 0.45),真实最大收缩力在未手术侧显著降低(P= 0.04)。结论:膝关节OA患者有明显的双侧自主活动障碍,至少部分在TKA后3年内可逆转。TKA后立即进行的康复计划应侧重于减少自愿激活缺陷。在自主激活改善后,物理治疗应针对股四头肌力量的增强。226 / Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2002
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信