Trolling Free Speech Rallies: Social Media Practices and the (Un)Democratic Spectacle of Dissent

Jennifer J. Asenas, Brittany Hubble
{"title":"Trolling Free Speech Rallies: Social Media Practices and the (Un)Democratic Spectacle of Dissent","authors":"Jennifer J. Asenas, Brittany Hubble","doi":"10.31390/TABOO.17.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of our article addresses two concerns of the special issue: taken for granted assumptions in the academy and complicating the way in which we have contented ourselves with anger at the expense of thoughtful engagement. Our essay explores the influence of Twitter on public dissent. We analyze the YouTube videos posted about the April 17th Free Speech rally as a text that demonstrates how the conventions of Twitter both shape how people publicly participate in and “report” dissent. Based on our analysis, we argue that the mapping of Twitter conventions onto both public dissent and citizen reporting turns the ACLU mantra of “‘combat[ing] hate speech with more speech’” on its head. So, while we agree that political expression and dissent are necessary to democracy, this kind of expression and dissent cultivates political resentment that undermines the foundations of democracy. We conclude with scholars’ responsibility to address this situation by cultivating both the right and responsibility of expression by balancing tolerance with respect and speaking and listening.","PeriodicalId":279537,"journal":{"name":"Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31390/TABOO.17.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The purpose of our article addresses two concerns of the special issue: taken for granted assumptions in the academy and complicating the way in which we have contented ourselves with anger at the expense of thoughtful engagement. Our essay explores the influence of Twitter on public dissent. We analyze the YouTube videos posted about the April 17th Free Speech rally as a text that demonstrates how the conventions of Twitter both shape how people publicly participate in and “report” dissent. Based on our analysis, we argue that the mapping of Twitter conventions onto both public dissent and citizen reporting turns the ACLU mantra of “‘combat[ing] hate speech with more speech’” on its head. So, while we agree that political expression and dissent are necessary to democracy, this kind of expression and dissent cultivates political resentment that undermines the foundations of democracy. We conclude with scholars’ responsibility to address this situation by cultivating both the right and responsibility of expression by balancing tolerance with respect and speaking and listening.
拖钓言论自由集会:社交媒体实践和(联合国)民主的异议景象
我们这篇文章的目的是解决这个特殊问题的两个问题:学术界想当然的假设,以及使我们以牺牲深思熟虑的参与为代价满足于愤怒的方式复杂化。我们的文章探讨了Twitter对公众异议的影响。我们分析了YouTube上有关4月17日言论自由集会的视频,认为这是一篇文章,展示了Twitter的惯例如何塑造了人们公开参与和“报告”异议的方式。根据我们的分析,我们认为,将Twitter惯例映射到公共异议和公民报道上,颠覆了ACLU“用更多言论打击仇恨言论”的口号。因此,虽然我们同意政治表达和持不同意见对民主是必要的,但这种表达和持不同意见会滋生政治怨恨,破坏民主的基础。我们的结论是,学者有责任通过平衡宽容与尊重、说和听,培养表达的权利和责任,来解决这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信