Analysis of the knot-tying force in dog models

J. Oguma, S. Ozawa, Y. Morikawa, T. Furukawa, M. Kitajima, K. Nakazawa, K. Ohnishi
{"title":"Analysis of the knot-tying force in dog models","authors":"J. Oguma, S. Ozawa, Y. Morikawa, T. Furukawa, M. Kitajima, K. Nakazawa, K. Ohnishi","doi":"10.1109/AMC.2004.1297670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From our experience of endoscopic surgery using the surgical robot da Vinci at our hospital, it has become clear that the lack of a sense of touch of the forceps makes meticulous operations difficult. For the development of a surgical robot that would impart a sense of touch, we investigated the appropriate knot-tying force by determining the relation between this force and wound healing in dog models. We cut and then sutured the jejenum of Beagle dogs, using a series of knot-tying forces (0.5-5.0 N). The jejenum was then removed on the 4/sup th/, 7/sup th/, 11/sup th/ and 14/sup th/ postoperative days, and the microvessel density for each force was measured to determine the appropriate knot-tying force for the jejenum. The microvessel density in the submucosa on the 7/sup th/ and 11/sup th/ postoperative days was significantly higher for the knot-tying force of 1.5 N than for other forces used. Thus, the results of our study suggested that a knot-tying force of 1.5 N was the most appropriate force for suturing of wounds of the jejenum. We consider that this result would be useful for the development of a surgical robot that imparts a sense of touch to the surgeon's hand.","PeriodicalId":258936,"journal":{"name":"The 8th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2004. AMC '04.","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 8th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2004. AMC '04.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AMC.2004.1297670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

From our experience of endoscopic surgery using the surgical robot da Vinci at our hospital, it has become clear that the lack of a sense of touch of the forceps makes meticulous operations difficult. For the development of a surgical robot that would impart a sense of touch, we investigated the appropriate knot-tying force by determining the relation between this force and wound healing in dog models. We cut and then sutured the jejenum of Beagle dogs, using a series of knot-tying forces (0.5-5.0 N). The jejenum was then removed on the 4/sup th/, 7/sup th/, 11/sup th/ and 14/sup th/ postoperative days, and the microvessel density for each force was measured to determine the appropriate knot-tying force for the jejenum. The microvessel density in the submucosa on the 7/sup th/ and 11/sup th/ postoperative days was significantly higher for the knot-tying force of 1.5 N than for other forces used. Thus, the results of our study suggested that a knot-tying force of 1.5 N was the most appropriate force for suturing of wounds of the jejenum. We consider that this result would be useful for the development of a surgical robot that imparts a sense of touch to the surgeon's hand.
犬模型打结力分析
从我们在我院使用达芬奇手术机器人进行内窥镜手术的经验来看,很明显,由于镊子缺乏触觉,很难进行细致的手术。为了开发一种具有触觉的手术机器人,我们通过确定狗模型中打结力与伤口愈合之间的关系来研究适当的打结力。我们采用0.5-5.0 N的打结力对Beagle犬的空肠进行切开缝合,并于术后第4天、第7天、第11天和第14天切除空肠,测量每种打结力下的微血管密度,以确定合适的空肠打结力。1.5 N打结力在术后第7天和第11天粘膜下层微血管密度显著高于其他打结力。因此,我们的研究结果表明,1.5 N的打结力是缝合空肠伤口最合适的力。我们认为,这一结果将有助于开发一种外科手术机器人,使外科医生的手具有触觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信