Educational Inequality

Yoshiaki Azuma, Herschel I. Grossman
{"title":"Educational Inequality","authors":"Yoshiaki Azuma, Herschel I. Grossman","doi":"10.18356/7b8411f4-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops a theoretical model of the inequality in wages and salaries associated with differences in years of schooling (educational inequality, for short). Our model assumes that in the long run individual decisions to become more educated equalize the lifetime earnings of more educated workers and comparable less educated workers. Given this assumption, our model implies that innovations that increase the relative demand for more educated labor, and which cause short-run increases in educational inequality, in the long run induce offsetting increases in the relative supply of more educated labor. But our model also has the novel implication that innovations that increase differences between the wages and salaries received by workers with the same years of education who are more or less able (ability premiums, for short) cause a smaller fraction of workers to choose to become more educated. Consequently, innovations that increase ability premiums in the long run also cause educational inequality to be larger than otherwise. In applying our theory to recent changes in educational inequality in the USA, we suggest that, to the extent that innovations that increase ability premiums are contributing to educational inequality, the increases in educational inequality during the 1980s and 1990s are unlikely to be reversed soon.","PeriodicalId":301854,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Labour: Review of Labour Economics & Industrial Relations","volume":" 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Labour: Review of Labour Economics & Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18356/7b8411f4-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This paper develops a theoretical model of the inequality in wages and salaries associated with differences in years of schooling (educational inequality, for short). Our model assumes that in the long run individual decisions to become more educated equalize the lifetime earnings of more educated workers and comparable less educated workers. Given this assumption, our model implies that innovations that increase the relative demand for more educated labor, and which cause short-run increases in educational inequality, in the long run induce offsetting increases in the relative supply of more educated labor. But our model also has the novel implication that innovations that increase differences between the wages and salaries received by workers with the same years of education who are more or less able (ability premiums, for short) cause a smaller fraction of workers to choose to become more educated. Consequently, innovations that increase ability premiums in the long run also cause educational inequality to be larger than otherwise. In applying our theory to recent changes in educational inequality in the USA, we suggest that, to the extent that innovations that increase ability premiums are contributing to educational inequality, the increases in educational inequality during the 1980s and 1990s are unlikely to be reversed soon.
教育不平等
本文建立了一个理论模型,来解释与受教育年限差异相关的工资和薪金不平等(简称教育不平等)。我们的模型假设,从长远来看,受教育程度更高的个人决定会使受教育程度更高的工人和受教育程度较低的工人的终身收入相等。考虑到这一假设,我们的模型表明,创新增加了对受教育程度更高的劳动力的相对需求,并导致教育不平等的短期增加,从长期来看,会导致受教育程度更高的劳动力的相对供给的抵消性增加。但我们的模型也有一个新颖的含义,即创新会增加受教育年限相同、或多或少有能力的工人的工资和薪水之间的差异(简称能力溢价),导致更少的工人选择接受更高的教育。因此,从长远来看,提高能力溢价的创新也会导致教育不平等的加剧。在将我们的理论应用于美国最近教育不平等的变化时,我们认为,就提高能力溢价的创新导致教育不平等的程度而言,20世纪80年代和90年代教育不平等的加剧不太可能很快逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信