Do Cultural Values Affect Negotiation Styles in Pakistan: The Mediatory Role of Cultural Intelligence

Wajiha Akmal, D. Siddiqui
{"title":"Do Cultural Values Affect Negotiation Styles in Pakistan: The Mediatory Role of Cultural Intelligence","authors":"Wajiha Akmal, D. Siddiqui","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3683091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Culture assumes a significant job in deciding the way to deal with business matters, method of managing and gatherings with subordinates and associates, and different business correspondences and choices. Successful cross-cultural negotiation requires a good understanding of the differences in cultural values and Behaviors. The purpose of this study is to identify the association between the values that influence culture, different Negotiation styles, and the Cultural Intelligence in Pakistani Environment. For this, we apply Caputo et. al. (2019) framework on Pakistani employees. We hypothesize that cultural values such as Power Distance (PO), Uncertainty Avoidance (UN), Collectivism (CO), Long-Term Orientation (LTO), and Masculinity (MA), significantly affect the mode of negotiations i.e. Competitive (CN) or Cooperative (CON). Competitive negotiation styles involve the use of distributive or combative tactics, such as threats, false promises, misrepresentation of positions, bluffing, selective disclosure, and sometimes deception to force concessions from the other parties or the cooperative negotiation style that involves the use of tactics to increase cooperation and information exchange with the other party. Moreover, this relationship is mediated through Cultural Intelligence (CQ). CQ construct consisted of four elements: (i) metacognitive CQ (MCCI), (ii) cognitive CQ (CCI), (iii) motivational CQ (MCI) , and (iv) behavioral CQ (BCI). First, metacognitive CQ describes an individual's conscious awareness of the cultural interactions and, within such situations, the ability to identify their own and other people's thoughts and to strategize. Second, cognitive CQ reflects an individual's knowledge of a cultural group's values, beliefs, and norms. Motivational CQ, reflects an individual's interest, drive, directed energy, and willingness to learn about cultural differences. Finally, behavioral CQ is an individual's ability to choose the appropriate verbal and physical actions and thereby, to effectively accomplish her goals when interacting with people from different cultures. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data were collected from 200 employees working in the educational, banking, and telecommunication sector, and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results indicate that Long-Term Orientation (LTO) has a significant and positive effect on most of the CQ dimensions i.e. BCI, MCCI, MCI, whereas Masculinity seems to have a negative and significant effect on all CQ dimensions. Power distance also seems to affect BCI and MCI negatively while Uncertainty Avoidance affected CCI positively. Surprisingly, Collectivism didn’t seem to be affecting any CQ. Moreover, All dimensions of CQ seems to affect Cooperative NS (CON) significantly, whereas Competitive (CN) was positively and significantly influenced by CCI and MCCI. Hence, investigating and evaluating the cultural values of an organization in consolidation with cultural intelligence and negotiation styles may lead to the practice of dealings.","PeriodicalId":104123,"journal":{"name":"Negotiation Processes & Communications eJournal","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Negotiation Processes & Communications eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3683091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Culture assumes a significant job in deciding the way to deal with business matters, method of managing and gatherings with subordinates and associates, and different business correspondences and choices. Successful cross-cultural negotiation requires a good understanding of the differences in cultural values and Behaviors. The purpose of this study is to identify the association between the values that influence culture, different Negotiation styles, and the Cultural Intelligence in Pakistani Environment. For this, we apply Caputo et. al. (2019) framework on Pakistani employees. We hypothesize that cultural values such as Power Distance (PO), Uncertainty Avoidance (UN), Collectivism (CO), Long-Term Orientation (LTO), and Masculinity (MA), significantly affect the mode of negotiations i.e. Competitive (CN) or Cooperative (CON). Competitive negotiation styles involve the use of distributive or combative tactics, such as threats, false promises, misrepresentation of positions, bluffing, selective disclosure, and sometimes deception to force concessions from the other parties or the cooperative negotiation style that involves the use of tactics to increase cooperation and information exchange with the other party. Moreover, this relationship is mediated through Cultural Intelligence (CQ). CQ construct consisted of four elements: (i) metacognitive CQ (MCCI), (ii) cognitive CQ (CCI), (iii) motivational CQ (MCI) , and (iv) behavioral CQ (BCI). First, metacognitive CQ describes an individual's conscious awareness of the cultural interactions and, within such situations, the ability to identify their own and other people's thoughts and to strategize. Second, cognitive CQ reflects an individual's knowledge of a cultural group's values, beliefs, and norms. Motivational CQ, reflects an individual's interest, drive, directed energy, and willingness to learn about cultural differences. Finally, behavioral CQ is an individual's ability to choose the appropriate verbal and physical actions and thereby, to effectively accomplish her goals when interacting with people from different cultures. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data were collected from 200 employees working in the educational, banking, and telecommunication sector, and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results indicate that Long-Term Orientation (LTO) has a significant and positive effect on most of the CQ dimensions i.e. BCI, MCCI, MCI, whereas Masculinity seems to have a negative and significant effect on all CQ dimensions. Power distance also seems to affect BCI and MCI negatively while Uncertainty Avoidance affected CCI positively. Surprisingly, Collectivism didn’t seem to be affecting any CQ. Moreover, All dimensions of CQ seems to affect Cooperative NS (CON) significantly, whereas Competitive (CN) was positively and significantly influenced by CCI and MCCI. Hence, investigating and evaluating the cultural values of an organization in consolidation with cultural intelligence and negotiation styles may lead to the practice of dealings.
文化价值观是否影响巴基斯坦的谈判风格:文化智力的中介作用
文化在决定处理商业事务的方式、管理下属和同事聚会的方法以及不同的商业往来和选择方面起着重要的作用。成功的跨文化谈判需要很好地理解文化价值观和行为的差异。本研究旨在探讨巴基斯坦环境中影响文化的价值观、不同的谈判风格与文化智力之间的关系。为此,我们将Caputo等人(2019)的框架应用于巴基斯坦员工。我们假设权力距离(PO)、不确定性规避(UN)、集体主义(CO)、长期取向(LTO)和男子气概(MA)等文化价值观显著影响谈判模式,即竞争(CN)或合作(CON)。竞争性谈判风格包括使用分配或战斗策略,如威胁、虚假承诺、歪曲立场、虚张声势、选择性披露,有时还包括欺骗来迫使对方让步;合作性谈判风格包括使用策略来增加与对方的合作和信息交换。此外,这种关系是通过文化智力(CQ)中介的。CQ结构包括四个要素:(1)元认知CQ (MCCI),(2)认知CQ (CCI),(3)动机CQ (MCI)和(4)行为CQ (BCI)。首先,元认知文商描述了个人对文化互动的有意识意识,以及在这种情况下识别自己和他人思想并制定策略的能力。第二,认知文商反映了个人对一个文化群体的价值观、信仰和规范的了解。动机性文商,反映了一个人的兴趣、动力、定向能量和学习文化差异的意愿。最后,行为文商是个人在与不同文化背景的人交往时,选择适当的语言和肢体动作,从而有效地完成目标的能力。实证效度是通过封闭式问卷调查建立的。本研究收集了200名在教育、银行和电信部门工作的员工的数据,并使用验证性因子分析和结构方程模型进行分析。研究结果表明,长期取向(LTO)对CQ的大部分维度(即BCI、MCCI、MCI)都有显著的正向影响,而男性气质对CQ的所有维度都有显著的负向影响。权力距离对BCI和MCI也有负向影响,而不确定性规避对CCI有正向影响。令人惊讶的是,集体主义似乎没有影响任何CQ。此外,CQ的所有维度都显著影响合作性决策(CON),而竞争性决策(CN)受到CCI和MCCI的显著正向影响。因此,调查和评估一个组织的文化价值,结合文化智力和谈判风格,可能会导致交易的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书