Comparison of compression performance of 10-bit vs. 8-bit depth, under H.264 Hi422 profile

Damian Ruiz, S. Sladojevic, D. Culibrk, G. Fernández-Escribano
{"title":"Comparison of compression performance of 10-bit vs. 8-bit depth, under H.264 Hi422 profile","authors":"Damian Ruiz, S. Sladojevic, D. Culibrk, G. Fernández-Escribano","doi":"10.1109/TELSKS.2013.6704904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"H.264 is one of the first video coding standard incorporating coding formats with a bit-depth of above 8 bits. This paper presents the results of compression comparison tests for the H.264 “High 422” profile, between 10-bit and 8-bit sample depths. The simulations were run on five 720p and 1080i high definition sequences. PSNR and SSIM metrics were used to evaluate the objective quality performance of both bit-depths, and with the aim of enabling a fair comparison, both metrics were computed with 10-bit precision, up-scaling the 8-bit decoded sequences to 10-bits. Some works have been published in this field based on the evaluation of commercial 10-bit H.264 implementations. In this work, we carry out a neutral evaluation of H.264 standard performance using the official H.264 Reference Software. Unlike the expected 10-bit coding gains, the results show unnoticeable differences between both sample depths in terms of objective quality, lower 0.1dB for PSNR and 0.002 for SSIM, with a 5% bit rate saving that can be achieved for the luminance component, especially for the 720p format, and negligible quality improvement for U and V chroma components.","PeriodicalId":144044,"journal":{"name":"2013 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELSKS.2013.6704904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

H.264 is one of the first video coding standard incorporating coding formats with a bit-depth of above 8 bits. This paper presents the results of compression comparison tests for the H.264 “High 422” profile, between 10-bit and 8-bit sample depths. The simulations were run on five 720p and 1080i high definition sequences. PSNR and SSIM metrics were used to evaluate the objective quality performance of both bit-depths, and with the aim of enabling a fair comparison, both metrics were computed with 10-bit precision, up-scaling the 8-bit decoded sequences to 10-bits. Some works have been published in this field based on the evaluation of commercial 10-bit H.264 implementations. In this work, we carry out a neutral evaluation of H.264 standard performance using the official H.264 Reference Software. Unlike the expected 10-bit coding gains, the results show unnoticeable differences between both sample depths in terms of objective quality, lower 0.1dB for PSNR and 0.002 for SSIM, with a 5% bit rate saving that can be achieved for the luminance component, especially for the 720p format, and negligible quality improvement for U and V chroma components.
H.264 Hi422配置文件下10位与8位深度压缩性能的比较
H.264是最早采用8位以上深度编码格式的视频编码标准之一。本文介绍了H.264“高422”轮廓在10位和8位采样深度之间的压缩比较测试结果。模拟在5个720p和1080i高清序列上运行。PSNR和SSIM指标用于评估两个比特深度的客观质量性能,为了实现公平的比较,两个指标都以10位精度计算,将8位解码序列放大到10位。在对商用10位H.264实现进行评估的基础上,该领域已经发表了一些著作。在这项工作中,我们使用官方的H.264参考软件对H.264标准的性能进行了中性的评估。与预期的10位编码增益不同,结果显示两种样本深度在物镜质量方面的差异不明显,PSNR降低0.1dB, SSIM降低0.002,亮度分量(特别是720p格式)可以节省5%的比特率,U和V色度分量的质量改善可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信