Accurate and Efficient Algorithms that Adapt to Privacy-Enhanced Video for Improved Assistive Monitoring

Alex D. Edgcomb, F. Vahid
{"title":"Accurate and Efficient Algorithms that Adapt to Privacy-Enhanced Video for Improved Assistive Monitoring","authors":"Alex D. Edgcomb, F. Vahid","doi":"10.1145/2523025.2523026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated monitoring algorithms operating on live video streamed from a home can effectively aid in several assistive monitoring goals, such as detecting falls or estimating daily energy expenditure. Use of video raises obvious privacy concerns. Several privacy enhancements have been proposed such as modifying a person in video by introducing blur, silhouette, or bounding-box. Person extraction is fundamental in video-based assistive monitoring and degraded in the presence of privacy enhancements; however, privacy enhancements have characteristics that can opportunistically be adapted to. We propose two adaptive algorithms for improving assistive monitoring goal performance with privacy-enhanced video: specific-color hunter and edge-void filler. A nonadaptive algorithm, foregrounding, is used as the default algorithm for the adaptive algorithms. We compare nonadaptive and adaptive algorithms with 5 common privacy enhancements on the effectiveness of 8 automated monitoring goals. The nonadaptive algorithm performance on privacy-enhanced video is degraded from raw video. However, adaptive algorithms can compensate for the degradation. Energy estimation accuracy in our tests degraded from 90.9% to 83.9%, but the adaptive algorithms significantly compensated by bringing the accuracy up to 87.1%. Similarly, fall detection accuracy degraded from 1.0 sensitivity to 0.86 and from 1.0 specificity to 0.79, but the adaptive algorithms compensated accuracy back to 0.92 sensitivity and 0.90 specificity. Additionally, the adaptive algorithms were computationally more efficient than the nonadaptive algorithm, averaging 1.7% more frames processed per second.","PeriodicalId":178565,"journal":{"name":"ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst.","volume":"686 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2523025.2523026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Automated monitoring algorithms operating on live video streamed from a home can effectively aid in several assistive monitoring goals, such as detecting falls or estimating daily energy expenditure. Use of video raises obvious privacy concerns. Several privacy enhancements have been proposed such as modifying a person in video by introducing blur, silhouette, or bounding-box. Person extraction is fundamental in video-based assistive monitoring and degraded in the presence of privacy enhancements; however, privacy enhancements have characteristics that can opportunistically be adapted to. We propose two adaptive algorithms for improving assistive monitoring goal performance with privacy-enhanced video: specific-color hunter and edge-void filler. A nonadaptive algorithm, foregrounding, is used as the default algorithm for the adaptive algorithms. We compare nonadaptive and adaptive algorithms with 5 common privacy enhancements on the effectiveness of 8 automated monitoring goals. The nonadaptive algorithm performance on privacy-enhanced video is degraded from raw video. However, adaptive algorithms can compensate for the degradation. Energy estimation accuracy in our tests degraded from 90.9% to 83.9%, but the adaptive algorithms significantly compensated by bringing the accuracy up to 87.1%. Similarly, fall detection accuracy degraded from 1.0 sensitivity to 0.86 and from 1.0 specificity to 0.79, but the adaptive algorithms compensated accuracy back to 0.92 sensitivity and 0.90 specificity. Additionally, the adaptive algorithms were computationally more efficient than the nonadaptive algorithm, averaging 1.7% more frames processed per second.
准确和有效的算法,适应隐私增强视频改进辅助监控
自动监控算法在家庭直播视频流上运行,可以有效地帮助实现几个辅助监控目标,例如检测跌倒或估计每日能源消耗。视频的使用引起了明显的隐私问题。已经提出了一些隐私增强功能,例如通过引入模糊、剪影或边界框来修改视频中的人物。人员提取是基于视频的辅助监控的基础,在隐私增强的情况下会降低;然而,隐私增强具有一些可以因机制宜地加以适应的特性。我们提出了两种自适应算法来提高隐私增强视频的辅助监控目标性能:特定颜色猎人和边缘空白填充。一种非自适应算法,前景,被用作自适应算法的默认算法。我们比较了具有5种常见隐私增强的非自适应算法和自适应算法对8个自动监控目标的有效性。对于原始视频,非自适应算法在隐私增强视频上的性能下降。然而,自适应算法可以弥补退化。在我们的测试中,能量估计精度从90.9%下降到83.9%,但自适应算法显著补偿,使精度达到87.1%。同样,跌落检测的准确性从1.0的灵敏度下降到0.86,从1.0的特异性下降到0.79,但自适应算法将准确性补偿回0.92的灵敏度和0.90的特异性。此外,自适应算法比非自适应算法计算效率更高,平均每秒多处理1.7%的帧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信