Crowdsourcing: a comprehensive literature review

Mokter Hossain, I. Kauranen
{"title":"Crowdsourcing: a comprehensive literature review","authors":"Mokter Hossain, I. Kauranen","doi":"10.1108/SO-12-2014-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– The purpose of this paper is to explore the development of crowdsourcing literature. , – This study is a comprehensive review of 346 articles on crowdsourcing. Both statistical and contents analyses were conducted in this paper. , – ISI listed journal articles, non-ISI listed journal articles and conference articles have had nearly the same contribution in crowdsourcing literature. Articles published in non-ISI listed journals have had an essential role in the initial theory development related to crowdsourcing. Scholars from the USA have authored approximately the same number of articles as scholars from all the European countries combined. Scholars from developing countries have been more relatively active in authoring conference articles than journal articles. Only very recently, top-tier journals have engaged in publishing on crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing has proven to be beneficial in many tasks, but the extant literature does not give much help to practitioners in capturing value from crowdsourcing. Despite understanding that the motivations of crowds are crucial when planning crowdsourcing activities, the various motivations in different contexts have not been explored sufficiently. A major concern has been the quality and accuracy of information that has been gathered through crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing bears a lot of unused potential. For example, it can increase employment opportunities to low-income people in developing countries. On the other hand, more should be known of fair ways to organize crowdsourcing so that solution seekers do not get a chance to exploit individuals committing to provide solutions. , – The literature included in the study is extensive, but an all-inclusive search for articles was limited to only nine selected publishers. However, in addition to the articles retrieved from the nine selected publishers, 52 highly cited articles were also included from other publishers. , – Crowdsourcing has much unused potential, and the use of crowdsourcing is increasing rapidly. The study provides a thematic review of various applications of crowdsourcing. , – The study is the first of its kind to explore the development of crowdsourcing literature, discussing the loci and foci of extant articles and listing applications of crowdsourcing. Successful applications of crowdsourcing include idea generation, microtasking, citizen science, public participation, wikies, open source software and citizen journalism.","PeriodicalId":319712,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal","volume":"40 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"143","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-12-2014-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 143

Abstract

– The purpose of this paper is to explore the development of crowdsourcing literature. , – This study is a comprehensive review of 346 articles on crowdsourcing. Both statistical and contents analyses were conducted in this paper. , – ISI listed journal articles, non-ISI listed journal articles and conference articles have had nearly the same contribution in crowdsourcing literature. Articles published in non-ISI listed journals have had an essential role in the initial theory development related to crowdsourcing. Scholars from the USA have authored approximately the same number of articles as scholars from all the European countries combined. Scholars from developing countries have been more relatively active in authoring conference articles than journal articles. Only very recently, top-tier journals have engaged in publishing on crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing has proven to be beneficial in many tasks, but the extant literature does not give much help to practitioners in capturing value from crowdsourcing. Despite understanding that the motivations of crowds are crucial when planning crowdsourcing activities, the various motivations in different contexts have not been explored sufficiently. A major concern has been the quality and accuracy of information that has been gathered through crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing bears a lot of unused potential. For example, it can increase employment opportunities to low-income people in developing countries. On the other hand, more should be known of fair ways to organize crowdsourcing so that solution seekers do not get a chance to exploit individuals committing to provide solutions. , – The literature included in the study is extensive, but an all-inclusive search for articles was limited to only nine selected publishers. However, in addition to the articles retrieved from the nine selected publishers, 52 highly cited articles were also included from other publishers. , – Crowdsourcing has much unused potential, and the use of crowdsourcing is increasing rapidly. The study provides a thematic review of various applications of crowdsourcing. , – The study is the first of its kind to explore the development of crowdsourcing literature, discussing the loci and foci of extant articles and listing applications of crowdsourcing. Successful applications of crowdsourcing include idea generation, microtasking, citizen science, public participation, wikies, open source software and citizen journalism.
众包:综合文献综述
-本文的目的是探讨众包文学的发展。本研究是对346篇众包相关文章的综合综述。本文进行了统计分析和内容分析。-ISI收录的期刊文章、非ISI收录的期刊文章和会议文章对众包文献的贡献几乎相同。在非isi列出的期刊上发表的文章在与众包相关的初始理论发展中发挥了重要作用。美国学者撰写的文章数量与所有欧洲国家学者的总和大致相同。与期刊文章相比,发展中国家的学者在撰写会议文章方面相对更为活跃。直到最近,顶级期刊才开始从事众包出版。众包已被证明在许多任务中是有益的,但现有的文献并没有给实践者提供太多帮助,以从众包中获取价值。尽管了解人群的动机在规划众包活动时至关重要,但不同背景下的各种动机尚未得到充分探讨。一个主要问题是通过众包收集的信息的质量和准确性。众包有很多未被利用的潜力。例如,它可以增加发展中国家低收入人群的就业机会。另一方面,应该更多地了解组织众包的公平方式,这样寻求解决方案的人就不会有机会利用承诺提供解决方案的个人。-本研究中包含的文献非常广泛,但对文章的全面搜索仅限于选定的9家出版商。然而,除了从选定的9家出版商检索到的文章外,还包括了来自其他出版商的52篇高被引文章。——众包有很多未被利用的潜力,众包的使用正在迅速增加。该研究对众包的各种应用进行了专题回顾。——该研究首次探讨了众包文献的发展,讨论了现存文献的位点和焦点,并列出了众包的应用。众包的成功应用包括创意生成、微任务、公民科学、公众参与、维基、开源软件和公民新闻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信