Rhetorical questions as reproaching devices

Marta Albelda Marco
{"title":"Rhetorical questions as reproaching devices","authors":"Marta Albelda Marco","doi":"10.1075/jlac.00077.alb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper studies rhetorical questions containing cognitive verbs that function as reproaches in Spanish. Its two\n main goals are to determine the degree of specialization of rhetorical questions as reproaches and to examine the characterization\n of reproaching as a speech act, indicating the distinctive features that distinguish it from other similar speech acts.\n Based on a contextual analysis of approximately 500 instances of reproaches in conflict talk drawn from the\n Spanish Royal Academy’s Corpes XXI corpus, I identify and describe the most commonly used cognitive verbs and syntactic structures used\n in rhetorical questions. The results show that reproach is a reactive-provocative speech act in which the speaker reacts to a\n contradiction perceived in their interlocutor’s words, actions or thoughts. The speaker appeals to their interlocutor’s moral\n conscience, making them think about this inconsistency; finally, the speaker creates the expectation of a duty that should have\n been carried out by the interlocutor.","PeriodicalId":324436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00077.alb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper studies rhetorical questions containing cognitive verbs that function as reproaches in Spanish. Its two main goals are to determine the degree of specialization of rhetorical questions as reproaches and to examine the characterization of reproaching as a speech act, indicating the distinctive features that distinguish it from other similar speech acts. Based on a contextual analysis of approximately 500 instances of reproaches in conflict talk drawn from the Spanish Royal Academy’s Corpes XXI corpus, I identify and describe the most commonly used cognitive verbs and syntactic structures used in rhetorical questions. The results show that reproach is a reactive-provocative speech act in which the speaker reacts to a contradiction perceived in their interlocutor’s words, actions or thoughts. The speaker appeals to their interlocutor’s moral conscience, making them think about this inconsistency; finally, the speaker creates the expectation of a duty that should have been carried out by the interlocutor.
作为责备手段的反问句
本文研究了西班牙语中包含具有责备功能的认知动词的反问句。它的两个主要目标是确定作为责备的修辞问题的专业化程度,并研究作为言语行为的责备的特征,指出区别于其他类似言语行为的独特特征。基于对来自西班牙皇家学院Corpes XXI语料库的大约500个冲突谈话中的责备实例的语境分析,我确定并描述了反问句中最常用的认知动词和句法结构。结果表明,责备是一种反应性挑衅性言语行为,在这种言语行为中,说话者对对话者在言语、行为或思想中感知到的矛盾做出反应。说话者诉诸于对话者的道德良知,让他们思考这种矛盾;最后,说话者创造了对话者本应履行的义务的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信