Environmental, social and governance and the firm life cycle: evidence from the Brazilian market

Caritsa Scartaty Moreira, Jaqueline G. R. de Araújo, Gilson Rodrigues da Silva, Wenner Glaucio Lopes Lucena
{"title":"Environmental, social and governance and the firm life cycle: evidence from the Brazilian market","authors":"Caritsa Scartaty Moreira, Jaqueline G. R. de Araújo, Gilson Rodrigues da Silva, Wenner Glaucio Lopes Lucena","doi":"10.1590/1808-057x20231729.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study analyzed the association between environmental, social and governance (ESG) and the life cycle stages of Brazilian publicly-traded companies listed on the B3 S.A. - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (B3) from 2010 to 2020. It explores a theoretical gap regarding the relationship between the life cycle stages of companies and ESG initiatives in Brazil, an emerging country. The findings are relevant for understanding how the life cycle stages act as signals of the level of ESG actions of companies and how the market perceives these actions and their ability to create value. The research provides evidence that the fundamentals of the firm life cycle theory function as indicators for several organizational perspectives, including ESG practices. The sample consisted of 109 companies whose data were collected from Thomson Reuters® and analyzed using multiple regression. The model proposed by Dickinson (2011) was used to analyze the life cycle stages. It should be highlighted that the data were also analyzed using the fixed effect as an estimation of the econometric model, but there was a loss of statistical significance in the relationship found, possibly due to the sample selection performed in the unbalanced panel. Based on the sample analyzed and the econometric models used, the results indicate that companies in the birth and turbulence stages have lower levels of ESG practices, particularly in the environmental and social pillars, compared to companies in the maturity stage. The findings also show that ESG initiatives in the Brazilian capital market are associated with measures of companies’ profitability, liquidity, indebtedness, market value, and number of analysts. The research contributes to the analysis of the relationship between the adoption of ESG practices and the life cycle stages of companies in an emerging market, with implications for stakeholders regarding the targeting of resources to sustainable actions.","PeriodicalId":251378,"journal":{"name":"Revista Contabilidade & Finanças","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Contabilidade & Finanças","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20231729.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study analyzed the association between environmental, social and governance (ESG) and the life cycle stages of Brazilian publicly-traded companies listed on the B3 S.A. - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (B3) from 2010 to 2020. It explores a theoretical gap regarding the relationship between the life cycle stages of companies and ESG initiatives in Brazil, an emerging country. The findings are relevant for understanding how the life cycle stages act as signals of the level of ESG actions of companies and how the market perceives these actions and their ability to create value. The research provides evidence that the fundamentals of the firm life cycle theory function as indicators for several organizational perspectives, including ESG practices. The sample consisted of 109 companies whose data were collected from Thomson Reuters® and analyzed using multiple regression. The model proposed by Dickinson (2011) was used to analyze the life cycle stages. It should be highlighted that the data were also analyzed using the fixed effect as an estimation of the econometric model, but there was a loss of statistical significance in the relationship found, possibly due to the sample selection performed in the unbalanced panel. Based on the sample analyzed and the econometric models used, the results indicate that companies in the birth and turbulence stages have lower levels of ESG practices, particularly in the environmental and social pillars, compared to companies in the maturity stage. The findings also show that ESG initiatives in the Brazilian capital market are associated with measures of companies’ profitability, liquidity, indebtedness, market value, and number of analysts. The research contributes to the analysis of the relationship between the adoption of ESG practices and the life cycle stages of companies in an emerging market, with implications for stakeholders regarding the targeting of resources to sustainable actions.
环境、社会和治理与企业生命周期:来自巴西市场的证据
本研究分析了2010年至2020年在巴西B3 S.A. - Brasil, Bolsa, balc (B3)上市的巴西上市公司的环境、社会和治理(ESG)与生命周期阶段之间的关系。它探讨了一个理论差距关于公司的生命周期阶段和ESG倡议之间的关系在巴西,一个新兴国家。这些发现对于理解生命周期阶段如何作为公司ESG行动水平的信号,以及市场如何感知这些行动及其创造价值的能力具有重要意义。该研究提供的证据表明,企业生命周期理论的基本原理可以作为包括ESG实践在内的几个组织视角的指标。样本由109家公司组成,这些公司的数据来自汤森路透®,并使用多元回归进行分析。采用Dickinson(2011)提出的模型对生命周期阶段进行分析。应该强调的是,数据也使用固定效应作为计量模型的估计进行了分析,但发现的关系中存在统计显著性损失,可能是由于在不平衡面板中进行的样本选择。基于对样本的分析和所使用的计量经济模型,结果表明,与处于成熟阶段的公司相比,处于萌芽阶段和动荡阶段的公司在ESG实践方面的水平较低,尤其是在环境和社会支柱方面。研究结果还表明,巴西资本市场的ESG举措与公司盈利能力、流动性、负债、市值和分析师数量等指标相关。该研究有助于分析新兴市场中采用ESG实践与公司生命周期阶段之间的关系,并对利益相关者关于可持续行动资源目标的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信