System Delays and Target Points: An Analysis of the ST-elevation MI Response Programme in a Single Centre

B. Toledano, K. B. Garganera, Jose Paolo A Prado, M. Sabas, Gregorio S Martinez
{"title":"System Delays and Target Points: An Analysis of the ST-elevation MI Response Programme in a Single Centre","authors":"B. Toledano, K. B. Garganera, Jose Paolo A Prado, M. Sabas, Gregorio S Martinez","doi":"10.15420/japsc.2022.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The goal in the treatment of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) is prompt revascularisation. This study aims to assess system delays and identify optimal target points within each step of the response program. Methods: This study included adults aged >19 years enrolled in the acute MI (AMI) registry due to STEMI and treated with emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2019 and June 2021. Door-to-balloon times and STEMI diagnosis-to-wire cross times were divided into Met and Unmet groups, and time frames were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test. For time frames with no significant difference, the median of the Met group was adopted, whereas, for significantly different time frames, the optimal target points were chosen from the highest percentages of Met if the value was less than or equal to the target point and Unmet if the value was greater than the target point. ORs with 95% CIs from binary logistic regression were calculated to predict the Met status. Results: In all, 113 participants were analysed. Significant delays were observed in ECG to paging (p≤0.034), cardiology fellow on duty (CFOD) arrival to STEMI diagnosis (p=0.008), STEMI diagnosis to consent (p≤0.001), consent to cath lab (p≤0.001) and cath lab to puncture (p=0.003). The optimal targets in minutes were as follows: door to ECG (≤9 median), ECG to paging (≤1, OR 2.19, p=0.069), paging to CFOD arrival (≤2 median), CFOD arrival to STEMI diagnosis (≤3, OR 2.15, p=0.086), STEMI diagnosis to consent (≤10, OR 7.57, p≤0.001), consent to cath lab (≤24, OR 15.38, p≤0.001), cath lab to puncture (≤12, OR 2.68, p≤0.043). Conclusion: In a developing country and during the COVID-19 pandemic, the most significant delays in our STEMI programme occurred in obtaining consent for emergency PCI and transferring patients to the cath lab. Optimal target points for each time frame can provide concrete objectives that may increase the likelihood of achieving door-to-balloon time and STEMI diagnosis to wire cross goals.","PeriodicalId":321604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/japsc.2022.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The goal in the treatment of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) is prompt revascularisation. This study aims to assess system delays and identify optimal target points within each step of the response program. Methods: This study included adults aged >19 years enrolled in the acute MI (AMI) registry due to STEMI and treated with emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2019 and June 2021. Door-to-balloon times and STEMI diagnosis-to-wire cross times were divided into Met and Unmet groups, and time frames were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test. For time frames with no significant difference, the median of the Met group was adopted, whereas, for significantly different time frames, the optimal target points were chosen from the highest percentages of Met if the value was less than or equal to the target point and Unmet if the value was greater than the target point. ORs with 95% CIs from binary logistic regression were calculated to predict the Met status. Results: In all, 113 participants were analysed. Significant delays were observed in ECG to paging (p≤0.034), cardiology fellow on duty (CFOD) arrival to STEMI diagnosis (p=0.008), STEMI diagnosis to consent (p≤0.001), consent to cath lab (p≤0.001) and cath lab to puncture (p=0.003). The optimal targets in minutes were as follows: door to ECG (≤9 median), ECG to paging (≤1, OR 2.19, p=0.069), paging to CFOD arrival (≤2 median), CFOD arrival to STEMI diagnosis (≤3, OR 2.15, p=0.086), STEMI diagnosis to consent (≤10, OR 7.57, p≤0.001), consent to cath lab (≤24, OR 15.38, p≤0.001), cath lab to puncture (≤12, OR 2.68, p≤0.043). Conclusion: In a developing country and during the COVID-19 pandemic, the most significant delays in our STEMI programme occurred in obtaining consent for emergency PCI and transferring patients to the cath lab. Optimal target points for each time frame can provide concrete objectives that may increase the likelihood of achieving door-to-balloon time and STEMI diagnosis to wire cross goals.
系统延迟和目标点:单中心st段抬高心肌梗死响应方案分析
背景:st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的治疗目标是及时血运重建。本研究旨在评估系统延迟,并在响应计划的每个步骤中确定最佳目标点。方法:本研究纳入了2019年1月至2021年6月期间因STEMI而登记急性心肌梗死(AMI)并接受紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的年龄>19岁的成年人。门到球囊的时间和STEMI诊断到导线的交叉时间分为Met组和Unmet组,时间框架使用Mann-Whitney u检验进行比较。对于没有显著差异的时间段,采用Met组的中位数,对于显著不同的时间段,如果Met值小于或等于目标点,则从最高百分比中选择最优目标点,如果Met值大于目标点,则从最高百分比中选择最优目标点。通过二元逻辑回归计算95% ci的or来预测Met状态。结果:共分析了113名参与者。心电图到分页(p≤0.034)、心内科值班人员(CFOD)到达STEMI诊断(p=0.008)、STEMI诊断到同意(p≤0.001)、同意到导管室(p≤0.001)和导管实验室穿刺(p=0.003)均有显著延迟。分钟内的最佳目标为:门到ECG(中位数≤9)、ECG到分页(≤1,OR 2.19, p=0.069)、分页到CFOD到达(中位数≤2)、CFOD到达到STEMI诊断(≤3,OR 2.15, p=0.086)、STEMI诊断到同意(≤10,OR 7.57, p≤0.001)、同意到导管室(≤24,OR 15.38, p≤0.001)、导管实验室到穿刺(≤12,OR 2.68, p≤0.043)。结论:在一个发展中国家,在COVID-19大流行期间,我们的STEMI项目最严重的延误发生在获得紧急PCI的同意和将患者转移到导管室。每个时间框架的最佳目标点可以提供具体的目标,这可能会增加实现门到球囊时间和STEMI诊断的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信