{"title":"Collecting and Analyzing Failure Data of Bluetooth Personal Area Networks","authors":"M. Cinque, Domenico Cotroneo, S. Russo","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2006.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents a failure data analysis campaign on Bluetooth personal area networks (PANs) conducted on two kind of heterogeneous testbeds (working for more than one year). The obtained results reveal how failures distribution is characterized and suggest how to improve the dependability of Bluetooth PANs. Specifically, we define the failure model and we then identify the most effective recovery actions and masking strategies that can be adopted for each failure. We then integrate the discovered recovery actions and masking strategies in our testbeds, improving the availability and the reliability of 3.64% (up to 36.6%) and 202% (referred to the mean time to failure), respectively","PeriodicalId":228470,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)","volume":"24 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2006.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
Abstract
This work presents a failure data analysis campaign on Bluetooth personal area networks (PANs) conducted on two kind of heterogeneous testbeds (working for more than one year). The obtained results reveal how failures distribution is characterized and suggest how to improve the dependability of Bluetooth PANs. Specifically, we define the failure model and we then identify the most effective recovery actions and masking strategies that can be adopted for each failure. We then integrate the discovered recovery actions and masking strategies in our testbeds, improving the availability and the reliability of 3.64% (up to 36.6%) and 202% (referred to the mean time to failure), respectively