Who are the Older Adults’ Users or Non-Users of the Internet before the Pandemic? Analysis of the Epifloripaageing Cohort Study (2009-2019)

Quialheiro A, Rech Cr, S. M., Boing Af, d´Orsi E
{"title":"Who are the Older Adults’ Users or Non-Users of the Internet before the Pandemic? Analysis of the Epifloripaageing Cohort Study (2009-2019)","authors":"Quialheiro A, Rech Cr, S. M., Boing Af, d´Orsi E","doi":"10.26420/gerontolgeriatrres.2022.1078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This ageing demographic transformation has been happening simultaneously with technological immersion, especially internet use in communication and health monitoring applications. Objective: This study’s primary aim was to characterize the Internet’s socioeconomic and demographic factors of internet users and non-users. The second aim was to analyze which factor, modifiable or not, influenced the incidence of older adults’ Internet use over time. Methods: This study was done with 722 EpiFloripa Ageing Cohort Study follow-up of older adults. The outcome is internet use according to waves 1 to 3, and the exposures are sociodemographic. It described the characteristics of internet users and non-users, and it used a longitudinal analysis model (Generalized Estimating Equations) to estimate Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Internet users were younger, with higher education and higher income than non-users over time. Most non-users of the Internet were women (54%) and white (93%), with an average of 66.4 years old and 14 years of study. Conclusion: The incidence of internet use was 11, 4% in Wave 2 and 23.0% in Wave 3 and was 80% lower in older adults 80 years and over compared to other age groups. Regarding schooling and family income, the internet use incidence was higher according to the increase in education levels and income range, except for older adults with more than 10 Brazilian minimum wages. Public policies are needed to reduce inequalities in access to the Internet and promote the digital inclusion of older adults.","PeriodicalId":310319,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology & Geriatrics: Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology & Geriatrics: Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/gerontolgeriatrres.2022.1078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This ageing demographic transformation has been happening simultaneously with technological immersion, especially internet use in communication and health monitoring applications. Objective: This study’s primary aim was to characterize the Internet’s socioeconomic and demographic factors of internet users and non-users. The second aim was to analyze which factor, modifiable or not, influenced the incidence of older adults’ Internet use over time. Methods: This study was done with 722 EpiFloripa Ageing Cohort Study follow-up of older adults. The outcome is internet use according to waves 1 to 3, and the exposures are sociodemographic. It described the characteristics of internet users and non-users, and it used a longitudinal analysis model (Generalized Estimating Equations) to estimate Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Internet users were younger, with higher education and higher income than non-users over time. Most non-users of the Internet were women (54%) and white (93%), with an average of 66.4 years old and 14 years of study. Conclusion: The incidence of internet use was 11, 4% in Wave 2 and 23.0% in Wave 3 and was 80% lower in older adults 80 years and over compared to other age groups. Regarding schooling and family income, the internet use incidence was higher according to the increase in education levels and income range, except for older adults with more than 10 Brazilian minimum wages. Public policies are needed to reduce inequalities in access to the Internet and promote the digital inclusion of older adults.
大流行前谁是老年人的互联网用户或非用户?2009-2019年epifloripaaging队列研究分析
背景:这种人口老龄化的转变是与技术融合同时发生的,特别是在通信和健康监测应用中使用互联网。目的:本研究的主要目的是表征互联网用户和非用户的互联网社会经济和人口因素。第二个目的是分析随着时间的推移,哪个因素(可改变或不可改变)会影响老年人的互联网使用频率。方法:本研究对722名老年人进行了EpiFloripa衰老队列研究随访。结果是根据波1到波3的互联网使用情况,暴露是社会人口统计学的。它描述了互联网用户和非互联网用户的特征,并使用纵向分析模型(广义估计方程)来估计95%置信区间的发病率比(IRR)。结果:随着时间的推移,互联网用户比非用户更年轻,受教育程度更高,收入更高。大多数不使用互联网的人是女性(54%)和白人(93%),平均年龄为66.4岁,学习年限为14年。结论:第二波网络使用率为11.4%,第三波为23.0%,80岁及以上老年人的网络使用率比其他年龄组低80%。在学校教育和家庭收入方面,互联网使用的发生率随着教育水平和收入范围的增加而增加,但收入超过10巴西最低工资的老年人除外。需要制定公共政策,减少互联网接入方面的不平等现象,促进老年人的数字包容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信