Discretionary Authority of the Indonesian National Police in the Implementation of Demonstrations

Amsir Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.36746/alj.v4i2.136

Patahillah Asba, Mohammad Wahyu

{"title":"Discretionary Authority of the Indonesian National Police in the Implementation of Demonstrations","authors":"Patahillah Asba, Mohammad Wahyu","doi":"10.36746/alj.v4i2.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to find out the provisions for the use of the discretionary authority of the police as regulated in laws and regulations and to find out the operational standards for implementing police discretion in securing demonstrations/demonstrations. The type of research used in this research was normative research. The results of this study indicated that the provisions for the use of the discretionary powers of the Police are regulated in Article 5, paragraph 1, letter a number 4 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 16, paragraph 1, Article 5 paragraph 1 letter a number 4 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 16 paragraph 1 of Law Number 2 of 2002. And operational standards for the implementation of Police discretion in securing mass actions when expressing opinions in public (demonstrations), namely the Dalmas unit is prohibited from carrying sharp weapons or firearms, mobile units by order of the commander and in a unit bond. Dalmas members are prohibited from arguing with the masses (submitted by the negotiating team), using the “T Stick” only to encourage the masses not to beat, using hollow bullets and rubber bullets at the request of the regional head of regional police and carried out by the action unit, and checking individual/unit equipment. \n___ \nReferences \nBooks with an author: \nArifin, Z. (2020). Penggunaan Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Pengamanan Penyampaian Pendapat Dimuka Umum (Unjuk Rasa) Ditinjau dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusia. Tegal: Universitas Pancasakti Tegal. \nMuladi. (2002). Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. \nRahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas. \nRahardjo, S. (2007). Membangun Polisi Sipil: Perspektif Hukum, Sosial, dan Kemasyarakatan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. \nSampara, S., and Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Makassar: Kretakupa Print. \nWahyu, Moh. Eka. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Pengamanan Demonstrasi di Polres Sidenreng Rappang. Parepare: Fakultas Hukum Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada. \nJournal articles: \nArif, M. (2021). Tugas dan fungsi kepolisian dalam perannya sebagai penegak hukum menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang kepolisian. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 13(1), 91-101. \nAsba, P., Syahril, M. Akbar Fhad., & Makkarawa, I. (2022). The Pollution of The Role of The Polri in The Prevention of Commotion in Demonstration. Traditional Journal of Law and Social Sciences (TJLSS), 1(2), 53–72. \nAsriyani, A., & Dwiyanti, A. (2022). Efektivitas Kepolisian dalam Melakukan Penyelidikan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online Melalui Media Elektronik Internet. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 10(1), 140-145. \nManalu, S. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Tindakan Diskresi Kepolisian pada Tahap Penyidikan. Fiat Iustitia, 1(1), 109-125. \nPurwanda, S., Bakhtiar, H. S., Miqat, N., Nur, R., & Patila, M. (2022). Formal Procedure Versus Victim's Interest: Antinomy of Handling Sexual Violence Cases In East Luwu. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 6(2), 116-122. \nWidodo, P., & Baharudin, B. (2022). Implementation of Community Policing Program using Problem-Solving Approach by Bhabinkamtibmas. Amsir Law Journal, 4(1), 32-41.","PeriodicalId":202883,"journal":{"name":"Amsir Law Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amsir Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v4i2.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to find out the provisions for the use of the discretionary authority of the police as regulated in laws and regulations and to find out the operational standards for implementing police discretion in securing demonstrations/demonstrations. The type of research used in this research was normative research. The results of this study indicated that the provisions for the use of the discretionary powers of the Police are regulated in Article 5, paragraph 1, letter a number 4 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 16, paragraph 1, Article 5 paragraph 1 letter a number 4 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 16 paragraph 1 of Law Number 2 of 2002. And operational standards for the implementation of Police discretion in securing mass actions when expressing opinions in public (demonstrations), namely the Dalmas unit is prohibited from carrying sharp weapons or firearms, mobile units by order of the commander and in a unit bond. Dalmas members are prohibited from arguing with the masses (submitted by the negotiating team), using the “T Stick” only to encourage the masses not to beat, using hollow bullets and rubber bullets at the request of the regional head of regional police and carried out by the action unit, and checking individual/unit equipment. ___ References Books with an author: Arifin, Z. (2020). Penggunaan Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Pengamanan Penyampaian Pendapat Dimuka Umum (Unjuk Rasa) Ditinjau dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusia. Tegal: Universitas Pancasakti Tegal. Muladi. (2002). Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas. Rahardjo, S. (2007). Membangun Polisi Sipil: Perspektif Hukum, Sosial, dan Kemasyarakatan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Sampara, S., and Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Makassar: Kretakupa Print. Wahyu, Moh. Eka. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Pengamanan Demonstrasi di Polres Sidenreng Rappang. Parepare: Fakultas Hukum Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada. Journal articles: Arif, M. (2021). Tugas dan fungsi kepolisian dalam perannya sebagai penegak hukum menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang kepolisian. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 13(1), 91-101. Asba, P., Syahril, M. Akbar Fhad., & Makkarawa, I. (2022). The Pollution of The Role of The Polri in The Prevention of Commotion in Demonstration. Traditional Journal of Law and Social Sciences (TJLSS), 1(2), 53–72. Asriyani, A., & Dwiyanti, A. (2022). Efektivitas Kepolisian dalam Melakukan Penyelidikan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online Melalui Media Elektronik Internet. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 10(1), 140-145. Manalu, S. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Tindakan Diskresi Kepolisian pada Tahap Penyidikan. Fiat Iustitia, 1(1), 109-125. Purwanda, S., Bakhtiar, H. S., Miqat, N., Nur, R., & Patila, M. (2022). Formal Procedure Versus Victim's Interest: Antinomy of Handling Sexual Violence Cases In East Luwu. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 6(2), 116-122. Widodo, P., & Baharudin, B. (2022). Implementation of Community Policing Program using Problem-Solving Approach by Bhabinkamtibmas. Amsir Law Journal, 4(1), 32-41.

查看原文本刊更多论文

印度尼西亚国家警察在实施示威活动方面的自由裁量权

本研究旨在找出法律法规对警察自由裁量权使用的规定，并找出警察自由裁量权在确保示威/示威活动中执行的操作标准。本研究使用的研究类型是规范研究。这项研究的结果表明，1981年《刑事诉讼法》第8号法律第5条第1款第4字规定了警察自由裁量权的使用，1981年《刑事诉讼法》第8号法律第16条第1款第5条第1款第4字规定了刑事诉讼法，2002年《第2号法律》第16条第1款规定了警察自由裁量权的使用。以及执行警察自由裁量权的行动标准，以确保在公开表达意见(示威)时的群众行动，即达尔马斯部队禁止携带尖锐武器或火器，机动部队根据指挥官的命令和单位契约。Dalmas成员禁止与群众争论(由谈判小组提交)，使用“T棒”只是为了鼓励群众不要殴打，在地区警察局长的要求下使用空心子弹和橡皮子弹，并由行动单位执行，并检查个人/单位装备。___参考书籍与作者:Arifin, Z.(2020)。Penggunaan Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Pengamanan Penyampaian Pendapat Dimuka Umum (Unjuk Rasa)法律:Universitas Pancasakti法律。Muladi。(2002)。政治和系统。三宝垄:巴丹国立大学迪波涅戈罗分校。Rahardjo, S.(2010)。Penegakan Hukum progress。雅加达:Penerbit Buku Kompas。Rahardjo, S.(2007)。Membangun Polisi Sipil:透视Hukum, social, dan Kemasyarakatan。雅加达:Gramedia Pustaka Utama。Sampara, S.和Husen, L. O.(2016)。Metode Penelitian Hukum。望加锡:Kretakupa Print。Wahyu,卫生部。类。(2022)。廷加旺·胡库姆·迪克瑞斯·迪克瑞斯·迪克瑞斯·迪克瑞斯·迪克瑞斯·迪克瑞斯·迪克瑞斯。家长:Fakultas Hukum institute Ilmu social dan Bisnis Andi Sapada。期刊论文:Arif, M.(2021)。Tugas dan fungsi kepolisian dalam perannya sebagai penegak hukum mennuut undang undang Nomor 2002年7月2日，tenang kepolisian。学报，13(1)，91-101。Asba, P.， Syahril, M. Akbar Fhad。(2022)。警察在示威中预防骚乱中的作用。传统法学社会科学，1(2)，53-72。Asriyani, A， & Dwiyanti, A.(2022)。马来西亚媒体电子互联网有限公司。诉讼学报，10(1)，140-145。Manalu, S.(2020)。分析Yuridis Tindakan Diskresi Kepolisian pada Tahap Penyidikan。生物学报，1(1)，109-125。Purwanda, S.， Bakhtiar, H. S.， Miqat, N.， Nur, R.， & Patila, M.(2022)。程序与被害人利益:鲁东地区性暴力案件处理的矛盾。生物医学学报，6(2)，116-122。Widodo, P.， & Baharudin, B.(2022)。Bhabinkamtibmas采用解决问题的方法实施社区警务计划。法学杂志，4(1)，32-41。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Amsir Law Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量