6. Virtual Eden: Lolita, Pornography, and the Perversions of American Studies

{"title":"6. Virtual Eden: Lolita, Pornography, and the Perversions of American Studies","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9780822384045-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Native of St. Petersburg, author of works in Russian and French as well as English, and sometime goalkeeper for Trinity College, Cambridge, soccer team, Vladimir Nabokov would not appear to be the most obvious avatar of American Studies in the subject’s nationalist phase of the s. My argument, however, is that Lolita, which first appeared in , can be seen as symbiotically intertwined with various classic texts of American Studies that helped to invent and define the field during the Truman and Eisenhower years. At times, the dream of Eden that permeates Nabokov’s narrative impels it towards becoming a parody of the early American Studies movement, which harboured within its collective consciousness similar vestiges of an imaginary paradise. More dexterously, though, Lolita makes the theoretical parameters of this movement visible, so that Nabokov’s novel might more accurately be described as a metafiction of area studies : a text which holds up a mirror to the implicit assumptions of American Studies and renders them translucent. Just as the process of metafiction can reilluminate ways in which more traditional artefacts have been constructed, so Nabokov’s virtualization of American Studies also reflects back upon the established boundaries of other national formations and nation-states, foregrounding the contingent status of their supposedly naturalized values and social markers. In particular, by focusing upon the cultural reception of Lolita in Britain, we will see how the book brings into play troublesome questions about the relationship between formal aesthetics, public morality, and social power. In this sense, Nabokov’s perverse reinscription of American Studies might be seen ironically to","PeriodicalId":233652,"journal":{"name":"Virtual Americas","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virtual Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822384045-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Native of St. Petersburg, author of works in Russian and French as well as English, and sometime goalkeeper for Trinity College, Cambridge, soccer team, Vladimir Nabokov would not appear to be the most obvious avatar of American Studies in the subject’s nationalist phase of the s. My argument, however, is that Lolita, which first appeared in , can be seen as symbiotically intertwined with various classic texts of American Studies that helped to invent and define the field during the Truman and Eisenhower years. At times, the dream of Eden that permeates Nabokov’s narrative impels it towards becoming a parody of the early American Studies movement, which harboured within its collective consciousness similar vestiges of an imaginary paradise. More dexterously, though, Lolita makes the theoretical parameters of this movement visible, so that Nabokov’s novel might more accurately be described as a metafiction of area studies : a text which holds up a mirror to the implicit assumptions of American Studies and renders them translucent. Just as the process of metafiction can reilluminate ways in which more traditional artefacts have been constructed, so Nabokov’s virtualization of American Studies also reflects back upon the established boundaries of other national formations and nation-states, foregrounding the contingent status of their supposedly naturalized values and social markers. In particular, by focusing upon the cultural reception of Lolita in Britain, we will see how the book brings into play troublesome questions about the relationship between formal aesthetics, public morality, and social power. In this sense, Nabokov’s perverse reinscription of American Studies might be seen ironically to
6. 虚拟伊甸园:洛丽塔,色情和美国研究的变态
弗拉基米尔·纳博科夫(Vladimir Nabokov)是圣彼得堡人,俄语、法语和英语作品的作者,有时还是剑桥大学三一学院足球队的守门员,在年代美国研究的民族主义阶段,他似乎不是美国研究最明显的化身。然而,我的观点是,《洛丽塔》首次出现在,可以被看作是与杜鲁门和艾森豪威尔时代帮助发明和定义美国研究领域的各种经典文本共生交织在一起的。有时,纳博科夫的叙事中弥漫着伊甸园的梦想,这促使它成为对早期美国研究运动的模仿,后者在其集体意识中隐藏着类似的想象天堂的痕迹。然而,洛丽塔更巧妙地将这一运动的理论参数变得清晰可见,因此纳博科夫的小说可能更准确地被描述为区域研究的元小说:一篇为美国研究的隐含假设提供一面镜子并使其透明的文本。正如元小说的过程可以重新阐明更传统的人工制品的构建方式一样,纳博科夫对美国研究的虚拟化也反映了其他民族形成和民族国家的既定边界,突出了他们被认为是自然化的价值观和社会标记的偶然地位。特别是,通过关注《洛丽塔》在英国的文化接受,我们将看到这本书是如何带来关于形式美学、公共道德和社会权力之间关系的棘手问题的。从这个意义上说,纳博科夫对美国研究的反常重新命名可能被视为具有讽刺意味
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信