A Comparison of Bone Scan Using between F-18 NaF PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP

P. Pusuwan, T. Ekjeen, C. Tocharoenchai, Kobkun Maungsomboon, K. Wiyaporn, C. Komoltri, A. Ruangma, Ruentip Tiparoj
{"title":"A Comparison of Bone Scan Using between F-18 NaF PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP","authors":"P. Pusuwan, T. Ekjeen, C. Tocharoenchai, Kobkun Maungsomboon, K. Wiyaporn, C. Komoltri, A. Ruangma, Ruentip Tiparoj","doi":"10.46475/ASEANJR.V19I2.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study bone scintigraphy using between F-18 NaF PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP scan for detecting bone metastases. \nMaterial and Methods: Thirteen patients (5 males, mean age 55.4 years, range 34-74 years) who were suspected bone metastases with single or two equivocal lesions on Tc-99m MDP bone scan were recruited between October 2010 and October 2012. All these patients underwent F-18 NaF PET/CT scan within one week after Tc-99m MDP bone scan. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Tc-99m MDP bone scan and F-18 NaF PET/CT in differentiating metastatic bone lesion from benign lesion by patientbased and lesion-based analyses were studied. \nResults: F-18 NaF PET/CT could identify all seven patients with malignant bone metastases that Tc-99m MDP bone scan was interpreted as malignancy in only three patients (42.9%) and equivocal in the rest of these patients. For lesion-based analysis of the overall 75 lesions, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Tc-99m MDP bone scan were 48%, 83.3% and 70.7% and F-18 NaF PET/CT were 100% for all parameters. Besides the ability of F-18 NaF PET/CT to accurately identify malignancy from benign lesion, unenhanced CT portion of PET/CT can show extra-osseous findings that may change patient management. \nConclusion: F-18 NaF PET/CT provides an excellent bone image quality and higher accuracy than Tc-99m MDP bone scan. Then F-18 NaF PET/CT is a good choice for evaluating bone metastases.","PeriodicalId":180936,"journal":{"name":"The ASEAN Journal of Radiology","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ASEAN Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46475/ASEANJR.V19I2.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study bone scintigraphy using between F-18 NaF PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP scan for detecting bone metastases. Material and Methods: Thirteen patients (5 males, mean age 55.4 years, range 34-74 years) who were suspected bone metastases with single or two equivocal lesions on Tc-99m MDP bone scan were recruited between October 2010 and October 2012. All these patients underwent F-18 NaF PET/CT scan within one week after Tc-99m MDP bone scan. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Tc-99m MDP bone scan and F-18 NaF PET/CT in differentiating metastatic bone lesion from benign lesion by patientbased and lesion-based analyses were studied. Results: F-18 NaF PET/CT could identify all seven patients with malignant bone metastases that Tc-99m MDP bone scan was interpreted as malignancy in only three patients (42.9%) and equivocal in the rest of these patients. For lesion-based analysis of the overall 75 lesions, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Tc-99m MDP bone scan were 48%, 83.3% and 70.7% and F-18 NaF PET/CT were 100% for all parameters. Besides the ability of F-18 NaF PET/CT to accurately identify malignancy from benign lesion, unenhanced CT portion of PET/CT can show extra-osseous findings that may change patient management. Conclusion: F-18 NaF PET/CT provides an excellent bone image quality and higher accuracy than Tc-99m MDP bone scan. Then F-18 NaF PET/CT is a good choice for evaluating bone metastases.
F-18 NaF PET/CT与Tc-99m MDP骨扫描的比较
目的:探讨F-18 NaF PET/CT与Tc-99m MDP骨显像对骨转移的检测价值。材料与方法:2010年10月至2012年10月,在Tc-99m MDP骨扫描中,13例疑似骨转移患者(男性5例,平均年龄55.4岁,年龄范围34-74岁)伴有单个或两个模棱两可病灶。所有患者在Tc-99m MDP骨扫描后一周内进行F-18 NaF PET/CT扫描。研究Tc-99m MDP骨扫描和F-18 NaF PET/CT鉴别转移性骨病变与良性骨病变的敏感性、特异性和准确性。结果:F-18 NaF PET/CT能识别所有7例恶性骨转移患者,Tc-99m MDP骨扫描仅3例(42.9%)被解释为恶性,其余患者解释不明确。对75个病灶进行基于病灶的分析,Tc-99m MDP骨扫描的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为48%、83.3%和70.7%,F-18 NaF PET/CT的所有参数均为100%。除了F-18 NaF PET/CT能够准确识别良性病变和恶性病变外,PET/CT未增强部分可以显示可能改变患者治疗的骨外表现。结论:F-18 NaF PET/CT具有较好的骨成像质量和准确性,优于Tc-99m MDP骨扫描。因此,F-18 NaF PET/CT是评估骨转移的良好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信