Impossible Liaisons? Genre and Feminist Film Criticism

K. Paszkiewicz
{"title":"Impossible Liaisons? Genre and Feminist Film Criticism","authors":"K. Paszkiewicz","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474425261.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter traces how, traditionally, feminist analyses of films authored by women tended to centre on experimental or art-house cinema and, subsequently, on genres culturally codified as ‘female’. It then goes on to engage with the most important debates around the concept of ‘women’s cinema’ and their significance in relation to genre theory. In particular, Alison Butler’s insights into women’s cinema as ‘minor cinema’, adapted from Deleuze and Guattari’s (1975) concept of the minor – as an alternative to the negative aesthetics of counter-cinema – is particularly apt here, as it allows for a reconsideration of women’s film authorship in mainstream productions and the ‘major’ language of film genres. Following and expanding this concept, it is argued that genres can be particularly productive spaces from which to think about female filmmakers, film authorship and the cultural politics of gender (especially in terms of the status of the woman author or her lack of status), as will be explored in the following chapters. Finally, instead of locking women filmmakers into a segregated gender sphere defined by ‘women’s culture’, the chapter argues for the mutability of gendered identities and questions the oversimplified notion of gender-to-gender cinematic identification – a typical assumption underpinning the categorisation of genres by gender – and suggests that ‘opportunities for resistance are more available than the opposition between “dominant cinema” and “counter-cinema” allows’ (Cook 2012: 33).","PeriodicalId":105961,"journal":{"name":"Genre, Authorship and Contemporary Women Filmmakers","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genre, Authorship and Contemporary Women Filmmakers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474425261.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter traces how, traditionally, feminist analyses of films authored by women tended to centre on experimental or art-house cinema and, subsequently, on genres culturally codified as ‘female’. It then goes on to engage with the most important debates around the concept of ‘women’s cinema’ and their significance in relation to genre theory. In particular, Alison Butler’s insights into women’s cinema as ‘minor cinema’, adapted from Deleuze and Guattari’s (1975) concept of the minor – as an alternative to the negative aesthetics of counter-cinema – is particularly apt here, as it allows for a reconsideration of women’s film authorship in mainstream productions and the ‘major’ language of film genres. Following and expanding this concept, it is argued that genres can be particularly productive spaces from which to think about female filmmakers, film authorship and the cultural politics of gender (especially in terms of the status of the woman author or her lack of status), as will be explored in the following chapters. Finally, instead of locking women filmmakers into a segregated gender sphere defined by ‘women’s culture’, the chapter argues for the mutability of gendered identities and questions the oversimplified notion of gender-to-gender cinematic identification – a typical assumption underpinning the categorisation of genres by gender – and suggests that ‘opportunities for resistance are more available than the opposition between “dominant cinema” and “counter-cinema” allows’ (Cook 2012: 33).
不可能的联络人吗?类型与女权主义电影评论
这一章追溯了传统上,女性主义对女性创作的电影的分析是如何倾向于集中在实验或艺术电影上的,随后,在文化上被编纂为“女性”的类型。然后,它继续参与围绕“女性电影”概念及其与类型理论相关的意义的最重要的辩论。特别是,艾莉森·巴特勒对女性电影作为“次要电影”的见解,改编自德勒兹和瓜塔里(1975)的“次要电影”概念——作为反电影的消极美学的一种选择——在这里特别合适,因为它允许重新考虑女性在主流作品中的电影作者身份和电影类型的“主要”语言。遵循并扩展这一概念,作者认为,流派可以成为思考女性电影人、电影作者和性别文化政治(尤其是女性作者的地位或缺乏地位)的特别富有成效的空间,这将在以下章节中进行探讨。最后,本章没有将女性电影人锁定在一个由“女性文化”定义的隔离的性别领域中,而是论证了性别身份的可变性,并质疑了性别对性别电影认同的过于简化的概念——这是一个典型的假设,支撑着按性别分类的类型——并建议“抵抗的机会比‘主导电影’和‘反电影’之间的对立更容易获得”(Cook 2012: 33)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信