Web History Tools and Revisitation Support: A Survey of Existing Approaches and Directions

M. Mayer
{"title":"Web History Tools and Revisitation Support: A Survey of Existing Approaches and Directions","authors":"M. Mayer","doi":"10.1561/1100000011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Millions of web pages are visited, and revisited every day. On average, every second page loaded was already visited before by the same user — individual means for recurrence rates range between 20% and 72% (cf. p. 24). People revisit pages within a session or between parallel ones, they reuse web-based tools habitually, monitor specific content or resume interrupted sessions, and they want to re-find content after longer periods of time. Current history tools that support such revisits show unique and severe shortcomings. Often, revisits are cumbersome, more than necessary. \n \nThis survey summarizes existing knowledge about revisitations on the web, and surveys the potential of graphic-based web history tools. A taxonomy of revisit-types distinguishes between short-, medium-, and long-term revisits, but also intra-and inter-session revisits. Assisted by a clear nomenclature this provides more clarity to the current discussion. The potential use of graphic-based tools is analyzed and discussed with respect to the found categories. The value of the current, mainly non-graphical history tools, such as back button, bookmarks, history list, search engines, and search bars is examined and related to the potential offered by graphic-based tools. \n \nThe survey provides summaries of key studies and bodies of research for those who are interested in improving the web users' experience by simplifying the processes of going back to resources visited seconds, minutes, hours, weeks, or even months ago. It is meant for developers and researchers, browser and search engine producers, web usability professionals, and those who feel an irresistible urge to creatively innovate the web. The time has come to design and offer more appropriate history support. This survey aims at providing a foundation, as well as valuable ideas for doing so.","PeriodicalId":126315,"journal":{"name":"Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact.","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Millions of web pages are visited, and revisited every day. On average, every second page loaded was already visited before by the same user — individual means for recurrence rates range between 20% and 72% (cf. p. 24). People revisit pages within a session or between parallel ones, they reuse web-based tools habitually, monitor specific content or resume interrupted sessions, and they want to re-find content after longer periods of time. Current history tools that support such revisits show unique and severe shortcomings. Often, revisits are cumbersome, more than necessary. This survey summarizes existing knowledge about revisitations on the web, and surveys the potential of graphic-based web history tools. A taxonomy of revisit-types distinguishes between short-, medium-, and long-term revisits, but also intra-and inter-session revisits. Assisted by a clear nomenclature this provides more clarity to the current discussion. The potential use of graphic-based tools is analyzed and discussed with respect to the found categories. The value of the current, mainly non-graphical history tools, such as back button, bookmarks, history list, search engines, and search bars is examined and related to the potential offered by graphic-based tools. The survey provides summaries of key studies and bodies of research for those who are interested in improving the web users' experience by simplifying the processes of going back to resources visited seconds, minutes, hours, weeks, or even months ago. It is meant for developers and researchers, browser and search engine producers, web usability professionals, and those who feel an irresistible urge to creatively innovate the web. The time has come to design and offer more appropriate history support. This survey aims at providing a foundation, as well as valuable ideas for doing so.
网络历史工具和重新访问支持:现有方法和方向的调查
每天都有数百万的网页被访问和重新访问。平均而言,每第二个加载的页面都是同一用户之前已经访问过的——复发率在20%到72%之间(参见第24页)。人们在一个会话内或在并行的会话之间重新访问页面,习惯性地重用基于web的工具,监控特定的内容或恢复中断的会话,并且他们希望在较长一段时间后重新找到内容。目前支持这种回顾的历史工具显示出独特而严重的缺陷。通常,重访是很麻烦的,甚至是不必要的。本调查总结了现有的关于网页浏览的知识,并调查了基于图形的网页历史工具的潜力。访问类型的分类区分了短期、中期和长期访问,以及会话内和会话间访问。在明确的命名法的帮助下,这为当前的讨论提供了更多的清晰度。根据所发现的类别,分析和讨论了基于图形的工具的潜在用途。当前主要是非图形历史工具(如后退按钮、书签、历史列表、搜索引擎和搜索栏)的价值被检查并与基于图形的工具提供的潜力相关。这项调查提供了一些重要的研究和研究成果的总结,以帮助那些有兴趣通过简化几秒钟、几分钟、几小时、几周甚至几个月前访问资源的过程来改善网络用户的体验。它是为开发人员和研究人员,浏览器和搜索引擎的生产者,网络可用性专业人士,以及那些感到不可抗拒的冲动,创造性地创新网络。现在是时候设计和提供更合适的历史支持了。这项调查的目的是为这样做提供一个基础,以及有价值的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信