Comparison Kinematic Patterns between the Star Excursion Balance Test and Y-Balance Test in Elite Athletes

J. Ko
{"title":"Comparison Kinematic Patterns between the Star Excursion Balance Test and Y-Balance Test in Elite Athletes","authors":"J. Ko","doi":"10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) and Y-Balance Test (YBT) have been commonly applied to measure dynamic postural stability ability. These two tests are utilized interchangeably in various settings. However, they could in fact require different movements to assess dynamic postural stability, as one uses a platform and different measuring techniques than the other. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a significant difference in the kinematic patterns in physically active population while performing the SEBT and the YBT. \nMethod: Seventy participants performed in the Anterior (AN), Posteromedial (PM), and Posterolateral (PL) directions of the SEBT and the YBT. The kinematics of hip, knee, and ankle in sagittal plane was calculated and analyzed. Paired-sample t-tests were performed to compare joint angular displacement in the ankle, knee, and hip between the SEBT and the YBT. \nResults: Significant differences in angular displacement at the hip, knee, and ankle joints in the sagittal plane between performance on the SEBT and on the YBT were observed. \nConclusion: Clinicians and researchers should not apply these dynamic postural control tasks interchangeably from one task to another. There appear to be kinematic pattern differences between tests in healthy physical active population.","PeriodicalId":306685,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) and Y-Balance Test (YBT) have been commonly applied to measure dynamic postural stability ability. These two tests are utilized interchangeably in various settings. However, they could in fact require different movements to assess dynamic postural stability, as one uses a platform and different measuring techniques than the other. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a significant difference in the kinematic patterns in physically active population while performing the SEBT and the YBT. Method: Seventy participants performed in the Anterior (AN), Posteromedial (PM), and Posterolateral (PL) directions of the SEBT and the YBT. The kinematics of hip, knee, and ankle in sagittal plane was calculated and analyzed. Paired-sample t-tests were performed to compare joint angular displacement in the ankle, knee, and hip between the SEBT and the YBT. Results: Significant differences in angular displacement at the hip, knee, and ankle joints in the sagittal plane between performance on the SEBT and on the YBT were observed. Conclusion: Clinicians and researchers should not apply these dynamic postural control tasks interchangeably from one task to another. There appear to be kinematic pattern differences between tests in healthy physical active population.
优秀运动员星形偏移平衡试验与y型平衡试验的运动学模式比较
目的:星偏移平衡试验(SEBT)和y -平衡试验(YBT)是测量动态姿态稳定能力的常用方法。这两个测试在各种设置中可互换使用。然而,它们实际上可能需要不同的动作来评估动态姿势的稳定性,因为一个使用的平台和测量技术不同于另一个。本研究的目的是确定在进行SEBT和YBT时,运动人群的运动模式是否有显著差异。方法:70名参与者在SEBT和YBT的前(AN),后内侧(PM)和后外侧(PL)方向进行了测试。计算并分析了髋关节、膝关节和踝关节矢状面运动学。采用配对样本t检验比较SEBT和YBT之间踝关节、膝关节和髋关节的关节角位移。结果:在SEBT和YBT上观察到髋关节、膝关节和踝关节矢状面角位移的显著差异。结论:临床医生和研究人员不应该将这些动态姿势控制任务从一个任务互换到另一个任务。在健康体力活动人群的测试中,似乎存在运动学模式差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信