Attached Jet Velocity Profiles in Mixing Tanks

L. Pease, J. Bamberger
{"title":"Attached Jet Velocity Profiles in Mixing Tanks","authors":"L. Pease, J. Bamberger","doi":"10.1115/fedsm2020-20220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Free jets have been studied in detail over much of the last century, but the theory for offset and attached jets remains incomplete. Attached jets differ from free jets in that they lose momentum to nearby surfaces, attenuating their velocities. The velocity profiles of free circular jets are nearly Gaussian, with quantitative mathematical descriptions derived from first principles by Goertler and Tollmien (Rajaratnam, 1976). In contrast, mathematical descriptions of three-dimensional attached jets from circular nozzles remain much less mature. Agelin-Chaab and Tachie (2011) used particle imaging velocimetry of a three-dimensional attached jet to show that the scaled velocity decays with scaled distance from the nozzle with a power law exponent between −1.15 and −1.20, which is larger in magnitude than that of a free jet. However, quantitative analytical expressions for the velocity profiles of attached jets similar to those of free jets remain elusive. This paper addresses this critical gap.\n Here we evaluate the velocity profiles of three-dimensional offset jets emerging from circular nozzles that become attached jets. These jets lose momentum due to interactions with nearby surfaces and are important to evaluating flows in mixing vessels and to suspending solids and trapped gases in radioactive waste tanks. Despite the importance of attached jets, prior insight has been purely experimental, limited to overly simplistic analytical models, or restricted to computationally expensive computational fluid dynamics case studies. We compare the expression of Verhoff (1963) to experimental results to find reasonable quantitative agreement.\n As stated by Agelin-Chaab and Tachie (2011), “detailed velocity measurements of 3D offset jets are rare.” Such remains the case. This study adds to the literature by providing information at two additional Reynolds numbers (1.43 · 106 and 1.87 · 106) and evaluating simple but accurate expressions for velocity profiles. These Reynolds numbers and corresponding velocities are higher, typically orders of magnitude higher, than other reports. The semi-empirical stream wise velocity profile perpendicular to the surface proposed by Verhoff (1963) is in approximate agreement with these velocity profiles, which is surprising because these attached jets are three-dimensional instead of two-dimensional as evaluated by Verhoff. However, additional work is necessary to fully describe these profiles quantitatively.","PeriodicalId":333138,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Fluid Mechanics; Multiphase Flows","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Fluid Mechanics; Multiphase Flows","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/fedsm2020-20220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Free jets have been studied in detail over much of the last century, but the theory for offset and attached jets remains incomplete. Attached jets differ from free jets in that they lose momentum to nearby surfaces, attenuating their velocities. The velocity profiles of free circular jets are nearly Gaussian, with quantitative mathematical descriptions derived from first principles by Goertler and Tollmien (Rajaratnam, 1976). In contrast, mathematical descriptions of three-dimensional attached jets from circular nozzles remain much less mature. Agelin-Chaab and Tachie (2011) used particle imaging velocimetry of a three-dimensional attached jet to show that the scaled velocity decays with scaled distance from the nozzle with a power law exponent between −1.15 and −1.20, which is larger in magnitude than that of a free jet. However, quantitative analytical expressions for the velocity profiles of attached jets similar to those of free jets remain elusive. This paper addresses this critical gap. Here we evaluate the velocity profiles of three-dimensional offset jets emerging from circular nozzles that become attached jets. These jets lose momentum due to interactions with nearby surfaces and are important to evaluating flows in mixing vessels and to suspending solids and trapped gases in radioactive waste tanks. Despite the importance of attached jets, prior insight has been purely experimental, limited to overly simplistic analytical models, or restricted to computationally expensive computational fluid dynamics case studies. We compare the expression of Verhoff (1963) to experimental results to find reasonable quantitative agreement. As stated by Agelin-Chaab and Tachie (2011), “detailed velocity measurements of 3D offset jets are rare.” Such remains the case. This study adds to the literature by providing information at two additional Reynolds numbers (1.43 · 106 and 1.87 · 106) and evaluating simple but accurate expressions for velocity profiles. These Reynolds numbers and corresponding velocities are higher, typically orders of magnitude higher, than other reports. The semi-empirical stream wise velocity profile perpendicular to the surface proposed by Verhoff (1963) is in approximate agreement with these velocity profiles, which is surprising because these attached jets are three-dimensional instead of two-dimensional as evaluated by Verhoff. However, additional work is necessary to fully describe these profiles quantitatively.
随附的混合槽射流速度分布图
在上个世纪的大部分时间里,人们对自由射流进行了详细的研究,但对偏流和附流的理论仍然不完整。附着射流与自由射流的不同之处在于,它们向附近的表面失去动量,从而降低了它们的速度。自由圆形射流的速度分布接近高斯分布,由Goertler和Tollmien (Rajaratnam, 1976)从第一性原理推导出定量数学描述。相比之下,圆形喷嘴的三维附加射流的数学描述仍然不太成熟。Agelin-Chaab和Tachie(2011)利用三维附着射流的粒子成像测速方法表明,随距离喷嘴的距离的增加,标度速度衰减,幂律指数在- 1.15 ~ - 1.20之间,其量级大于自由射流。然而,与自由射流相似的附著射流速度分布的定量分析表达式仍然难以捉摸。本文解决了这一关键差距。在这里,我们评估了从圆形喷嘴中产生的三维偏置射流成为附着射流的速度分布。这些射流由于与附近表面的相互作用而失去动量,对于评估混合容器中的流动以及悬浮固体和放射性废物罐中捕获的气体非常重要。尽管附加射流很重要,但之前的见解纯粹是实验性的,局限于过于简单的分析模型,或者局限于计算成本高昂的计算流体动力学案例研究。我们将Verhoff(1963)的表达式与实验结果进行比较,以找到合理的定量一致。正如Agelin-Chaab和Tachie(2011)所述,“3D偏移射流的详细速度测量是罕见的。”这种情况仍然存在。本研究通过提供两个额外雷诺数(1.43·106和1.87·106)的信息,并评估了速度剖面的简单而准确的表达式,为文献提供了补充。这些雷诺数和相应的速度比其他报告高,通常高几个数量级。Verhoff(1963)提出的垂直于表面的半经验气流速度剖面与这些速度剖面大致一致,这是令人惊讶的,因为这些附着的射流是三维的,而不是Verhoff所评估的二维的。然而,需要额外的工作来充分定量地描述这些概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信