ICDAR2017 Competition on Recognition of Early Indian Printed Documents - REID2017

C. Clausner, A. Antonacopoulos, T. Derrick, S. Pletschacher
{"title":"ICDAR2017 Competition on Recognition of Early Indian Printed Documents - REID2017","authors":"C. Clausner, A. Antonacopoulos, T. Derrick, S. Pletschacher","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.2017.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an objective comparative evaluation of page analysis and recognition methods for historical documents with text mainly in Bengali language and script. It de-scribes the competition (modus operandi, dataset and evaluation methodology) held in the context of ICDAR2017, presenting the results of the evaluation of seven methods – three sub-mitted and four variations of open source state-of-the-art systems. The focus is on optical character recognition (OCR) performance. Different evaluation metrics were used to gain an insight into the algorithms, including new character accuracy metrics to better reflect the difficult circumstances presented by the documents. The results indicate that deep learning approaches are the most promising, but there is still a considerable need to develop robust methods that deal with challenges of historic material of this nature.","PeriodicalId":433676,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2017.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper presents an objective comparative evaluation of page analysis and recognition methods for historical documents with text mainly in Bengali language and script. It de-scribes the competition (modus operandi, dataset and evaluation methodology) held in the context of ICDAR2017, presenting the results of the evaluation of seven methods – three sub-mitted and four variations of open source state-of-the-art systems. The focus is on optical character recognition (OCR) performance. Different evaluation metrics were used to gain an insight into the algorithms, including new character accuracy metrics to better reflect the difficult circumstances presented by the documents. The results indicate that deep learning approaches are the most promising, but there is still a considerable need to develop robust methods that deal with challenges of historic material of this nature.
早期印度印刷文件识别竞赛- REID2017
本文对以孟加拉语和手写体为主要文本的历史文献的页面分析和识别方法进行了客观的比较评价。它描述了在ICDAR2017背景下举行的竞赛(操作方式、数据集和评估方法),展示了七种方法的评估结果——三种提交的方法和四种开源最先进系统的变体。重点是光学字符识别(OCR)性能。使用不同的评估指标来深入了解算法,包括新的字符准确性指标,以更好地反映文档所呈现的困难情况。结果表明,深度学习方法是最有前途的,但仍然需要开发强大的方法来处理这种性质的历史材料的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信