Effective Return Prevention Measures in the Post-purchase Stage: A Best-Worst Scaling Approach

Benedikt M. Brand, C. Kopplin
{"title":"Effective Return Prevention Measures in the Post-purchase Stage: A Best-Worst Scaling Approach","authors":"Benedikt M. Brand, C. Kopplin","doi":"10.15358/0344-1369-2023-1-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the rather nascent literature stream examining product returns, the authors identify that the vast majority of studies enlightens return avoidance measures (before ordering), whereas return averting measures (after purchasing) showed to increase customer satisfaction the most. Moreover, extant literature is characterized by methodological paucity, which prevents a more diverse view on the problem of product returns. As a result, the authors enrich the literature by conducting a Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) experiment dealing with various product averting measures (including different types of measures with different levels of immediacy). Focusing on the most frequent online shopping segment (Generation Y) and the second most frequently occurring reason for product returns (i.e., consumers did not like the product), the authors exploratively evince that monetary/utilitarian measures are preferred most and are effective, as well as funding of social and sustainability projects. However, substantial differences were detected based on consumers’ green consumption values. Apart from that, the study contributes to the BWS literature by outlining the necessity to include anchor scaling and quality assessment criteria.","PeriodicalId":446283,"journal":{"name":"Marketing ZFP","volume":"689 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing ZFP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2023-1-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the rather nascent literature stream examining product returns, the authors identify that the vast majority of studies enlightens return avoidance measures (before ordering), whereas return averting measures (after purchasing) showed to increase customer satisfaction the most. Moreover, extant literature is characterized by methodological paucity, which prevents a more diverse view on the problem of product returns. As a result, the authors enrich the literature by conducting a Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) experiment dealing with various product averting measures (including different types of measures with different levels of immediacy). Focusing on the most frequent online shopping segment (Generation Y) and the second most frequently occurring reason for product returns (i.e., consumers did not like the product), the authors exploratively evince that monetary/utilitarian measures are preferred most and are effective, as well as funding of social and sustainability projects. However, substantial differences were detected based on consumers’ green consumption values. Apart from that, the study contributes to the BWS literature by outlining the necessity to include anchor scaling and quality assessment criteria.
购后阶段有效的退货预防措施:一种最佳-最差标度方法
在相当新生的研究产品退货的文献流中,作者发现绝大多数研究都启发了退货避免措施(在订购之前),而退货避免措施(在购买之后)显示出最能提高客户满意度。此外,现有文献的特点是方法上的缺乏,这阻碍了对产品退货问题的更多样化的看法。因此,作者通过进行最佳-最差尺度(BWS)实验来丰富文献,该实验处理各种产品规避措施(包括具有不同即时性水平的不同类型的措施)。关注最频繁的在线购物群体(Y一代)和产品退货的第二常见原因(即消费者不喜欢产品),作者探索性地证明,货币/功利主义措施是最受欢迎的,也是有效的,以及为社会和可持续发展项目提供资金。然而,根据消费者的绿色消费价值观,发现了实质性的差异。除此之外,该研究还概述了纳入锚定尺度和质量评估标准的必要性,从而为BWS文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信