The Principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda in Fintech Transactions is Reviewed Through The Perspective of Ushul Fiqh

Septarina Budiwati, Muhammed Junaidi, W. T. Nugroho
{"title":"The Principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda in Fintech Transactions is Reviewed Through The Perspective of Ushul Fiqh","authors":"Septarina Budiwati, Muhammed Junaidi, W. T. Nugroho","doi":"10.21111/AL-IKTISAB.V4I1.4350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda as part of the legal principle, which is commonly described as \"agreement as applicable to the author\" carries its own implications in the practice of society, where the public must perform the agreement c onsistently, consequent , and full of responsibility. No exception in transactions in Financial Technology (Fintech), the applicability of this principle to be a reference for both parties to equally believe that the transaction process (lending) between them can be held accountable in terms of m oral-ethical laws. The purpose of this research is to describe the validity of the p acta s unt s ervanda of the agreement on Fintech and describe the p acta s unt s ervanda basis reviewed through the study of u s h ul fiqh to soften a concrete solution against l egal problematics that exist on Fintech. The methods used in this study are juridical-normative. The results of the research show that with the trend of ease carried by the Fintech can erode the essence of the principle of the law itself, and create a destructive mindset which is an agreement of the r egarded as administrative terms that need to be met when conducting transactions on Fintech, so that various provisions inherent to the unreached F intech agreements. In addition to the absence of strict supervision in the process of F intech transactions facilitate the occurrence of fraud against the initial purpose of granting Fintech funds by the loan recipients.","PeriodicalId":188875,"journal":{"name":"Al-Iktisab: Journal of Islamic Economic Law","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Iktisab: Journal of Islamic Economic Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21111/AL-IKTISAB.V4I1.4350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda as part of the legal principle, which is commonly described as "agreement as applicable to the author" carries its own implications in the practice of society, where the public must perform the agreement c onsistently, consequent , and full of responsibility. No exception in transactions in Financial Technology (Fintech), the applicability of this principle to be a reference for both parties to equally believe that the transaction process (lending) between them can be held accountable in terms of m oral-ethical laws. The purpose of this research is to describe the validity of the p acta s unt s ervanda of the agreement on Fintech and describe the p acta s unt s ervanda basis reviewed through the study of u s h ul fiqh to soften a concrete solution against l egal problematics that exist on Fintech. The methods used in this study are juridical-normative. The results of the research show that with the trend of ease carried by the Fintech can erode the essence of the principle of the law itself, and create a destructive mindset which is an agreement of the r egarded as administrative terms that need to be met when conducting transactions on Fintech, so that various provisions inherent to the unreached F intech agreements. In addition to the absence of strict supervision in the process of F intech transactions facilitate the occurrence of fraud against the initial purpose of granting Fintech funds by the loan recipients.
从Ushul Fiqh的视角审视金融科技交易中的契约必须遵守原则
契约必须遵守原则作为法律原则的一部分,通常被描述为“适用于发件人的协议”,在社会实践中有其自身的含义,公众必须始终如一地、相应地和充分地履行协议。在金融科技(Fintech)的交易中也不例外,这一原则的适用性为双方平等地相信他们之间的交易过程(借贷)可以在道德-伦理法律方面承担责任提供了参考。本研究的目的是描述金融科技协议条款的有效性,并通过对金融科技协议条款的研究来描述金融科技协议条款的有效性基础,从而针对金融科技存在的所有法律问题提出具体的解决方案。本研究中使用的方法是司法规范的。研究结果表明,金融科技带来的随意性趋势会侵蚀法律本身原则的本质,并产生一种破坏性的思维方式,即将协议视为在金融科技上进行交易时需要满足的行政条款,从而使未达成的金融科技协议所固有的各种条款失效。此外,在金融科技交易过程中缺乏严格的监管,这也容易导致贷款接受者违背金融科技资金的最初目的而发生欺诈行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信