Bringing to Academic Responsibility for Violation of Academic Integrity: Theoretical and Applied Problems of Regulation

T. Krasiuk
{"title":"Bringing to Academic Responsibility for Violation of Academic Integrity: Theoretical and Applied Problems of Regulation","authors":"T. Krasiuk","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. The article highlights problematic issues related to academic responsibility for violations of academic integrity of participants in the educational process. Attention is drawn to the fact that a significant shortcoming of the Laws of Ukraine «On Education» and «On Higher Education» is the absence of such definitions as «academic responsibility», «types of academic responsibility», «academic misconduct», which significantly complicates the bringing to academic responsibility of pedagogical , scientific-pedagogical and scientific workers of educational institutions and students of education in practice. Analysis of recent researches and publications. A. Artyukhova, V. Zinchenko, Y. Kalinovsky, M. Ozhevan, O. Tytska, O. Chumak and others scientists have addressed the issue of academic integrity in their works. The scientific conclusions and approaches to the vision of these scholars are an important basis for our study. Target of the research is to study and comprehend the problematic issues of bringing to academic liability for violation of academic integrity of participants in the educational process. Article’s main body. Based on the analysis of current legislation, the author formulates a definition of the term “academic liability” and establishes its place in the general system of legal liability. The author’s definition of the term «academic responsibility» is proposed: this is a type of legal responsibility that arises for the violation of the academic integrity of pedagogical, scientific-pedagogical and scientific employees of educational institutions, students of education in scientific institutions and educational institutions and entails negative consequences of state influence in case of committing them of an academic offense. A critical assessment of the list of violations of academic integrity is given. It is noted that in the current educational legislation there is no differentiation of violations related to the training of highly qualified personnel (master’s students, doctoral students, etc.). Attention is drawn to the fact that the Law of Ukraine «On Education» establishes a list of violations of academic integrity, in which offenses that are completely different in terms of the degree of social damage, for example, self-plagiarism and bribery, are placed in the same row/ The author established that the Law of Ukraine «On Higher Education» contains a list of sanctions for violation of academic integrity not for all participants of the educational process, but only for pedagogical, scientific-pedagogical and scientific employees of educational institutions and students of education. Amendments to the current legislation regarding the clear definition of objective criteria for the selection of the type of academic responsibility for a specific violation of academic integrity are proposed. Conclusions and prospects for the development. It was concluded that academic responsibility is a multi-meaning concept, in particular, a type of social, corporate, moral-ethical, legal responsibility, is a type of state coercion. It is proposed to harmonize the provisions of the educational legislation with the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Criminal Code of Ukraine and other laws, which will regulate the types and measures of punishment for violating academic integrity. It is proved that academic responsibility can be legal (civil, labor, administrative, criminal), social, moral and ethical, corporate responsibility. Thus, academic responsibility intersects with legal responsibility. The need to establish the definition of the concept of «academic responsibility» at the legislative level and to regulate in detail all procedural aspects of bringing the participants of the educational process to academic responsibility is argued.","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem setting. The article highlights problematic issues related to academic responsibility for violations of academic integrity of participants in the educational process. Attention is drawn to the fact that a significant shortcoming of the Laws of Ukraine «On Education» and «On Higher Education» is the absence of such definitions as «academic responsibility», «types of academic responsibility», «academic misconduct», which significantly complicates the bringing to academic responsibility of pedagogical , scientific-pedagogical and scientific workers of educational institutions and students of education in practice. Analysis of recent researches and publications. A. Artyukhova, V. Zinchenko, Y. Kalinovsky, M. Ozhevan, O. Tytska, O. Chumak and others scientists have addressed the issue of academic integrity in their works. The scientific conclusions and approaches to the vision of these scholars are an important basis for our study. Target of the research is to study and comprehend the problematic issues of bringing to academic liability for violation of academic integrity of participants in the educational process. Article’s main body. Based on the analysis of current legislation, the author formulates a definition of the term “academic liability” and establishes its place in the general system of legal liability. The author’s definition of the term «academic responsibility» is proposed: this is a type of legal responsibility that arises for the violation of the academic integrity of pedagogical, scientific-pedagogical and scientific employees of educational institutions, students of education in scientific institutions and educational institutions and entails negative consequences of state influence in case of committing them of an academic offense. A critical assessment of the list of violations of academic integrity is given. It is noted that in the current educational legislation there is no differentiation of violations related to the training of highly qualified personnel (master’s students, doctoral students, etc.). Attention is drawn to the fact that the Law of Ukraine «On Education» establishes a list of violations of academic integrity, in which offenses that are completely different in terms of the degree of social damage, for example, self-plagiarism and bribery, are placed in the same row/ The author established that the Law of Ukraine «On Higher Education» contains a list of sanctions for violation of academic integrity not for all participants of the educational process, but only for pedagogical, scientific-pedagogical and scientific employees of educational institutions and students of education. Amendments to the current legislation regarding the clear definition of objective criteria for the selection of the type of academic responsibility for a specific violation of academic integrity are proposed. Conclusions and prospects for the development. It was concluded that academic responsibility is a multi-meaning concept, in particular, a type of social, corporate, moral-ethical, legal responsibility, is a type of state coercion. It is proposed to harmonize the provisions of the educational legislation with the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Criminal Code of Ukraine and other laws, which will regulate the types and measures of punishment for violating academic integrity. It is proved that academic responsibility can be legal (civil, labor, administrative, criminal), social, moral and ethical, corporate responsibility. Thus, academic responsibility intersects with legal responsibility. The need to establish the definition of the concept of «academic responsibility» at the legislative level and to regulate in detail all procedural aspects of bringing the participants of the educational process to academic responsibility is argued.
违反学术诚信的学术责任:规制的理论与应用问题
问题设置。文章强调了与教育过程中参与者违反学术诚信的学术责任有关的问题。值得注意的是,乌克兰《教育法》和《高等教育法》的一个重大缺陷是缺乏“学术责任”、“学术责任类型”、“学术不端行为”等定义,这大大复杂化了教育机构的教学、科学教学和科学工作者以及教育实践中的学生的学术责任。分析最近的研究和出版物。A. aryukhova, V. Zinchenko, Y. Kalinovsky, M. Ozhevan, O. Tytska, O. Chumak和其他科学家在他们的作品中解决了学术诚信问题。这些学者的科学结论和方法是我们研究的重要依据。本研究的目的是研究和理解教育过程中参与者因违反学术诚信而承担学术责任的问题。文章的主体。在对现行立法进行分析的基础上,对“学术责任”进行了界定,并确立了其在一般法律责任制度中的地位。提出了提交人对“学术责任”一词的定义:这是一种因教育机构的教学、科学-教学和科学雇员、科学机构和教育机构的教育学生的学术诚信受到侵犯而产生的法律责任,如果他们犯了学术罪,则会产生国家影响的负面后果。对违反学术诚信的清单进行了批判性评估。委员会注意到,在目前的教育立法中,没有区分与培养高素质人才(硕士生、博士生等)有关的违法行为。注意力被吸引到这一事实的法律乌克兰«教育»建立违反学术诚信的列表,在犯罪,是完全不同的社会损害的程度,例如,self-plagiarism和贿赂,被放置在相同的行/作者建立的法律乌克兰“高等教育”包含一系列制裁违反学术诚信不是为所有参与者的教育过程,但只有教学,教育机构的科学教师和科学从业人员以及教育学生。建议对现行立法作出修正,明确界定对具体违反学术诚信行为选择学术责任类型的客观标准。结论及发展展望。结论认为,学术责任是一个多含义的概念,特别是一种社会责任、企业责任、道德伦理责任、法律责任,是一种国家强制责任。建议将教育立法的规定与乌克兰刑事诉讼法、乌克兰民法典、乌克兰刑法等法律进行协调,以规范违反学术诚信的处罚类型和措施。事实证明,学术责任可以是法律责任(民事、劳动、行政、刑事)、社会责任、道德伦理责任、企业责任。因此,学术责任与法律责任是交叉的。有人认为有必要在立法一级确定“学术责任”概念的定义,并详细规定使教育过程的参与者承担学术责任的所有程序方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信