Peranan Advokat Dalam Pembelaan Hukum terhadap Terdakwa Korupsi di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pengadilan Negeri Samarinda (Tinjauan Etika Profesi Hukum)

Jaidun Jaidun
{"title":"Peranan Advokat Dalam Pembelaan Hukum terhadap Terdakwa Korupsi di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pengadilan Negeri Samarinda (Tinjauan Etika Profesi Hukum)","authors":"Jaidun Jaidun","doi":"10.24903/YRS.V11I2.522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smart and faithful people will never argue, that the State of the Republic of Indonesia is falling apart, debts mounting, to the point of reaching Rp. 4,000 (Four Thousand) Trillion is due to the crime of corruption that has taken root, curbed, thrived as if allowed to happen continuously. While law enforcement in this country does not provide a judicial verdict that has a deterrent effect for corruptors. It is difficult to understand in general, whether the legal verdict for corruption perpetrators by the Panel of Judges who hear and decide the case of corruption is influenced by the interference of fellow law enforcers ..., in this case, Advocates and Public Prosecutors (Prosecutors). Decisions of Corruption Courts often cause disparity in decisions, resulting in speculation from the public and assessing such decisions as being disproportionate and giving rise to public assumptions of a conspiracy between law enforcers, namely with several categories of interests, including: (1) The interests of the Prosecutor and Judges are in the interest of getting bribes (2) Advocates as law enforcers who accompany the defendant in defence of the interests of the accused by dirty and disgusting bribes. The role of advocates is very important in creating and maintaining a clean, authoritative and civilized justice system for the realization of the legal authority in this country.Thus, legal advocates must have faith and devotion to God strong and sturdy table and must dare to appear clean and first cleanse themselves from dirty thoughts in the midst of carrying out the legal profession, so that the noble profession is not polluted into contempt resulting from violation of legal norms and professional code of ethics by advocates. Based on the outputs achieved in this research program, namely the willingness and bottomlessness of the Advocates in defending the interests of the defendant must comply with the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations and uphold the Code of Ethics Procession.The analysis of this paper shows that lawyers have made a legal defence of corruption defendants in a professional manner in accordance with applicable legal provisions and upholds the code of ethics of the legal profession, even though there is also information about an advocate who is trying to bribe one of the Corruption Crimes judges in a case. which is being handled by the Advocate concerned. The description of the results of this survey is expected to be used as input and advice that can help realize the Court's decision which has a deterrent effect on corruptors and potential corruptors in the future.  ","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"119 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24903/YRS.V11I2.522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smart and faithful people will never argue, that the State of the Republic of Indonesia is falling apart, debts mounting, to the point of reaching Rp. 4,000 (Four Thousand) Trillion is due to the crime of corruption that has taken root, curbed, thrived as if allowed to happen continuously. While law enforcement in this country does not provide a judicial verdict that has a deterrent effect for corruptors. It is difficult to understand in general, whether the legal verdict for corruption perpetrators by the Panel of Judges who hear and decide the case of corruption is influenced by the interference of fellow law enforcers ..., in this case, Advocates and Public Prosecutors (Prosecutors). Decisions of Corruption Courts often cause disparity in decisions, resulting in speculation from the public and assessing such decisions as being disproportionate and giving rise to public assumptions of a conspiracy between law enforcers, namely with several categories of interests, including: (1) The interests of the Prosecutor and Judges are in the interest of getting bribes (2) Advocates as law enforcers who accompany the defendant in defence of the interests of the accused by dirty and disgusting bribes. The role of advocates is very important in creating and maintaining a clean, authoritative and civilized justice system for the realization of the legal authority in this country.Thus, legal advocates must have faith and devotion to God strong and sturdy table and must dare to appear clean and first cleanse themselves from dirty thoughts in the midst of carrying out the legal profession, so that the noble profession is not polluted into contempt resulting from violation of legal norms and professional code of ethics by advocates. Based on the outputs achieved in this research program, namely the willingness and bottomlessness of the Advocates in defending the interests of the defendant must comply with the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations and uphold the Code of Ethics Procession.The analysis of this paper shows that lawyers have made a legal defence of corruption defendants in a professional manner in accordance with applicable legal provisions and upholds the code of ethics of the legal profession, even though there is also information about an advocate who is trying to bribe one of the Corruption Crimes judges in a case. which is being handled by the Advocate concerned. The description of the results of this survey is expected to be used as input and advice that can help realize the Court's decision which has a deterrent effect on corruptors and potential corruptors in the future.  
萨马林达地方法院(法律伦理审查)的法律辩护律师的作用
聪明和忠诚的人永远不会争辩说,印度尼西亚共和国正在分崩离析,债务不断增加,达到4,000(4,000)万亿印尼盾,这是由于腐败犯罪已经扎根,遏制,蓬勃发展,仿佛允许不断发生。而这个国家的执法部门并没有提供对腐败分子有威慑作用的司法判决。一般来说,很难理解审理和裁决腐败案件的法官小组对腐败行为人的法律判决是否受到其他执法人员的干预的影响。在这种情况下,律师和检察官(检察官)。贪污法庭的裁决经常造成判决的差异,导致公众猜测,并评估这些决定不相称,并使公众认为执法人员之间存在阴谋,即涉及几类利益,包括:(1)检察官和法官的利益在于获取贿赂的利益(2)作为执法者的辩护人,通过肮脏和令人厌恶的贿赂,陪伴被告捍卫被告的利益。在这个国家,法律权威的实现,在创造和维护廉洁、权威、文明的司法制度中,律师的作用是非常重要的。因此,法律辩护人必须对上帝有坚定的信仰和虔诚,在从事法律职业的过程中,必须敢于表现得干净,首先要洗净自己的肮脏思想,使崇高的职业不因辩护人违反法律规范和职业道德准则而被污染为蔑视。从本研究项目得出的结果来看,辩护人维护被告利益的意愿和无底性必须遵守适用法律法规的规定,并坚持道德规范。本文的分析表明,律师按照适用的法律规定,以专业的方式为腐败被告进行了法律辩护,并维护了法律职业的道德准则,尽管也有信息表明律师试图贿赂案件中的一名腐败罪法官。这件事正在由律师处理有关调查结果的描述,希望能作为参考资料和意见,协助法院落实有关决定,在日后对贪污人士及潜在贪污人士起到阻吓作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信