The reproductive crisis in neoliberal capitalism: Commenting on D. Elson’s recent paper

IF 0.9
M. Itoh
{"title":"The reproductive crisis in neoliberal capitalism: Commenting on D. Elson’s recent paper","authors":"M. Itoh","doi":"10.1080/2329194X.2021.1875847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the first section, this paper comments favorably on Elson’s recent paper applying the “gender lens” to rising economic inequalities under neoliberal capitalism. Although increased participation of women in the labor market reduced economic inequalities within and between households to some extent, it widened the income gap between capital and labor. I note and comment on similar trends in the Japanese economy. In the second section, this paper examines how to reread Piketty as “patrimonialism without patriarchy” in light of Elson’s critique. In the third section, the widening economic and gender inequalities are located as an important link in the vicious circle of reproductive crisis of our societies, with suggestions for a sounder theoretical foundation and possible strategies for dealing with such crisis for the future.","PeriodicalId":174725,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese Political Economy","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2329194X.2021.1875847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In the first section, this paper comments favorably on Elson’s recent paper applying the “gender lens” to rising economic inequalities under neoliberal capitalism. Although increased participation of women in the labor market reduced economic inequalities within and between households to some extent, it widened the income gap between capital and labor. I note and comment on similar trends in the Japanese economy. In the second section, this paper examines how to reread Piketty as “patrimonialism without patriarchy” in light of Elson’s critique. In the third section, the widening economic and gender inequalities are located as an important link in the vicious circle of reproductive crisis of our societies, with suggestions for a sounder theoretical foundation and possible strategies for dealing with such crisis for the future.
新自由资本主义的生殖危机:对D. Elson最近论文的评论
在第一部分中,本文对Elson最近的一篇论文进行了正面评价,该论文将“性别视角”应用于新自由主义资本主义下日益加剧的经济不平等。虽然妇女更多地参与劳动力市场在一定程度上减少了家庭内部和家庭之间的经济不平等,但它扩大了资本和劳动力之间的收入差距。我注意到并评论了日本经济的类似趋势。第二部分,本文结合埃尔森的批判,探讨如何将皮凯蒂重新解读为“没有父权制的世袭主义”。第三部分将日益扩大的经济不平等和性别不平等定位为我国社会生殖危机恶性循环的一个重要环节,并对今后应对这一危机的理论基础和可能的战略提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书