Citational Practices: Interrogating Hegemonic Knowledge Structures in Computing Research in Latin America

Citational Justice Collective, Débora de Castro Leal, Gabriela Molina León, J. F. Maestre, Kristin Williams, Marisol Wong-Villacrés, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Sushil K. Oswal, Teresa Cerratto Pargman, Vishal Sharma
{"title":"Citational Practices: Interrogating Hegemonic Knowledge Structures in Computing Research in Latin America","authors":"Citational Justice Collective, Débora de Castro Leal, Gabriela Molina León, J. F. Maestre, Kristin Williams, Marisol Wong-Villacrés, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Sushil K. Oswal, Teresa Cerratto Pargman, Vishal Sharma","doi":"10.1145/3488392.3488411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citations are nodes in the networks of knowledge we create. Portals to conversations with the past and bonding material with the scholarship of the present. Choosing who we cite is a practice signaling who we recognize and respect as a knowledge source. Therefore, we recognize citations as a relational practice. As this relational characteristic of citing is mediated by wealth we distribute across those who we cite, it is imperative to interrogate how just these practices are. Thus, we ought to engage with Citational Justice. Building on recent work discussing citational practices within HCI, we use the opportunity of this workshop to expand this conversation into deeper reflection on how we cite and the practices and infrastructures surrounding citations. Our goal with this workshop is two-fold. First, to create a common language to collectively reflect, interrogate our own citational practices and reverberations, while fleshing out concrete steps to make these practices just in our work and communities we are part of. Second, to invite participants to re-imagine citational practices and the systems and infrastructures necessary to make such practices feasible. We invite a diverse group of participants from the CLIHC community interested in examining their citational practices and the systems surrounding them.","PeriodicalId":296023,"journal":{"name":"X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488392.3488411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Citations are nodes in the networks of knowledge we create. Portals to conversations with the past and bonding material with the scholarship of the present. Choosing who we cite is a practice signaling who we recognize and respect as a knowledge source. Therefore, we recognize citations as a relational practice. As this relational characteristic of citing is mediated by wealth we distribute across those who we cite, it is imperative to interrogate how just these practices are. Thus, we ought to engage with Citational Justice. Building on recent work discussing citational practices within HCI, we use the opportunity of this workshop to expand this conversation into deeper reflection on how we cite and the practices and infrastructures surrounding citations. Our goal with this workshop is two-fold. First, to create a common language to collectively reflect, interrogate our own citational practices and reverberations, while fleshing out concrete steps to make these practices just in our work and communities we are part of. Second, to invite participants to re-imagine citational practices and the systems and infrastructures necessary to make such practices feasible. We invite a diverse group of participants from the CLIHC community interested in examining their citational practices and the systems surrounding them.
引用实践:质疑拉丁美洲计算研究中的霸权知识结构
引文是我们创造的知识网络中的节点。它是与过去对话的门户,也是与现在的学术联系的材料。选择我们引用的人是一种实践,表明我们认可并尊重谁作为知识来源。因此,我们认为引用是一种关系实践。由于引用的这种关系特征是由我们在被引用的人身上分配的财富所调节的,因此有必要质疑这些做法到底有多公正。因此,我们应该参与引用正义。在最近讨论HCI中引用实践的工作基础上,我们利用这次研讨会的机会将对话扩展到更深层次的思考,即我们如何引用以及围绕引用的实践和基础设施。我们这次研讨会的目标是双重的。首先,创造一种共同的语言来集体反思和询问我们自己的引用实践和反响,同时充实具体的步骤,使这些实践在我们的工作和我们所在的社区中成为现实。第二,邀请与会者重新设想引文实践以及使这些实践可行所需的系统和基础设施。我们邀请来自CLIHC社区的不同群体的参与者,他们有兴趣检查他们的引用实践及其周围的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信