New Tendencies in Operational Risk Management in Banks: Challenges and Opportunities

Jelena Sobanova, Marina Kudinska
{"title":"New Tendencies in Operational Risk Management in Banks: Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"Jelena Sobanova, Marina Kudinska","doi":"10.22364/hssl.30.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of operational risk management in the bank increases every year. Banks need to take actions to prevent fraudulent activities, minimize errors in transactions, automate processes and improve data security. Ignoring operational risk procedures or failure to implement suitable control mechanisms could lead to unexpected losses, unsatisfied customers, and potentially regulatory sanctions, all of which could seriously harm bank’s reputation in a highly competitive market. A specific focus is on payments and security transactions, as they are linked to the biggest risks. Any regulatory driven project failure or IT project failure in the bank, insufficient project governance, failed implementation of a new system or failure in external data sources can lead to even bigger losses. After a review of the Basel Framework and the new set of standards of the upcoming changes to take effect as of 2023, the aim of this article is to elucidate the changes related to operational risk capital in banks and to ascertain the weakest points in operational risk management. Therefore, this topic is timely relevant, as the aim of the research is to manifest the possible changes withing operational risk management in banks, by gathering and analysing empirical evidence. This article is based on academic research and professional experience. The methods used in the research are comparison, generalization and graphical illustration of statistical information, identification of the main idea of regulatory frameworks and legal documentation. The main results and findings of the research are that banks will need to rethink the strategies of their capital management and this article emphasizes the importance of a redesigned approach towards operational risk assessment in Basel III and substantiates the efficiency of the proposed framework. With Basel III, each loss may cause more challenges, as will be considered twice, as the direct impact on profit/loss and direct impact on future operational risk capital. Another finding is that the biggest amounts of losses are related to corporate items events and according to the static data taken from ORX membership community, top five monthly losses are far from normal distribution. Important finding was that most of the banks were not prepared for COVID-19-pandemic and had to review operational risk procedures immediately to secure their business in working from home environment, meaning that gap in operational risk management existed already before COVID-19-pandemic.","PeriodicalId":120611,"journal":{"name":"Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/hssl.30.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of operational risk management in the bank increases every year. Banks need to take actions to prevent fraudulent activities, minimize errors in transactions, automate processes and improve data security. Ignoring operational risk procedures or failure to implement suitable control mechanisms could lead to unexpected losses, unsatisfied customers, and potentially regulatory sanctions, all of which could seriously harm bank’s reputation in a highly competitive market. A specific focus is on payments and security transactions, as they are linked to the biggest risks. Any regulatory driven project failure or IT project failure in the bank, insufficient project governance, failed implementation of a new system or failure in external data sources can lead to even bigger losses. After a review of the Basel Framework and the new set of standards of the upcoming changes to take effect as of 2023, the aim of this article is to elucidate the changes related to operational risk capital in banks and to ascertain the weakest points in operational risk management. Therefore, this topic is timely relevant, as the aim of the research is to manifest the possible changes withing operational risk management in banks, by gathering and analysing empirical evidence. This article is based on academic research and professional experience. The methods used in the research are comparison, generalization and graphical illustration of statistical information, identification of the main idea of regulatory frameworks and legal documentation. The main results and findings of the research are that banks will need to rethink the strategies of their capital management and this article emphasizes the importance of a redesigned approach towards operational risk assessment in Basel III and substantiates the efficiency of the proposed framework. With Basel III, each loss may cause more challenges, as will be considered twice, as the direct impact on profit/loss and direct impact on future operational risk capital. Another finding is that the biggest amounts of losses are related to corporate items events and according to the static data taken from ORX membership community, top five monthly losses are far from normal distribution. Important finding was that most of the banks were not prepared for COVID-19-pandemic and had to review operational risk procedures immediately to secure their business in working from home environment, meaning that gap in operational risk management existed already before COVID-19-pandemic.
银行操作风险管理的新趋势:挑战与机遇
操作风险管理在银行中的重要性逐年增加。银行需要采取措施防止欺诈活动,最大限度地减少交易中的错误,实现流程自动化并提高数据安全性。忽视操作风险程序或未能实施适当的控制机制可能导致意外损失、客户不满意以及潜在的监管制裁,所有这些都可能严重损害银行在竞争激烈的市场中的声誉。特别关注的是支付和安全交易,因为它们与最大的风险相关。银行中任何监管驱动的项目失败或IT项目失败、项目治理不足、新系统实施失败或外部数据源失败都可能导致更大的损失。在对巴塞尔框架和即将于2023年生效的即将变化的新标准进行审查后,本文的目的是阐明与银行操作风险资本相关的变化,并确定操作风险管理中的最薄弱环节。因此,这个话题是及时相关的,因为研究的目的是通过收集和分析经验证据来体现银行操作风险管理可能发生的变化。本文基于学术研究和专业经验。研究中使用的方法是统计信息的比较,概括和图形说明,识别监管框架和法律文件的主要思想。研究的主要结果和发现是,银行将需要重新思考其资本管理策略,本文强调了重新设计巴塞尔协议III中操作风险评估方法的重要性,并证实了拟议框架的效率。在巴塞尔协议III中,每一次损失都可能带来更多的挑战,这将被考虑两次,因为直接影响损益和对未来操作风险资本的直接影响。另一个发现是,最大的损失与公司项目事件有关,根据ORX会员社区的静态数据,前5个月的损失远非正态分布。重要的发现是,大多数银行没有为covid -19大流行做好准备,不得不立即审查操作风险程序,以确保其在家庭环境中工作,这意味着操作风险管理方面的差距在covid -19大流行之前已经存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信