The curse of copy&paste — Cloning in requirements specifications

Christoph Domann, Elmar Jürgens, Jonathan Streit
{"title":"The curse of copy&paste — Cloning in requirements specifications","authors":"Christoph Domann, Elmar Jürgens, Jonathan Streit","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2009.5315992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloning in source code is a well known quality defect that negatively affects software maintenance. In contrast, little is known about cloning in requirements specifications. We present a study on cloning in 11 real-world requirements specifications comprising 2,500 pages. For specification clone detection, an existing code clone detection tool is adapted and its precision analyzed. The study shows that a considerable amount of cloning exists, although the large variation between specifications suggests that some authors manage to avoid cloning. Examples of frequent types of clones are given and the negative consequences of cloning, particulary the obliteration of commonalities and variations, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":128479,"journal":{"name":"2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2009.5315992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Cloning in source code is a well known quality defect that negatively affects software maintenance. In contrast, little is known about cloning in requirements specifications. We present a study on cloning in 11 real-world requirements specifications comprising 2,500 pages. For specification clone detection, an existing code clone detection tool is adapted and its precision analyzed. The study shows that a considerable amount of cloning exists, although the large variation between specifications suggests that some authors manage to avoid cloning. Examples of frequent types of clones are given and the negative consequences of cloning, particulary the obliteration of commonalities and variations, are discussed.
复制和粘贴的诅咒——需求规范中的克隆
源代码中的克隆是一个众所周知的质量缺陷,它会对软件维护产生负面影响。相比之下,在需求规范中对克隆知之甚少。我们在包含2500页的11个真实需求规范中提出了一项关于克隆的研究。针对规范克隆检测,采用了现有的代码克隆检测工具,并对其精度进行了分析。研究表明,存在相当数量的克隆,尽管规范之间的巨大差异表明一些作者设法避免克隆。给出了克隆的常见类型的例子,并讨论了克隆的负面后果,特别是共性和变异的消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信