Methodological Aspects of Lactate Measurement – Evaluation of the Accuracy of Photometric and Biosensor Methods

A. Biedler, S. Schneider, F. Bach, S. Soltesz, W. Wilhelm, S. Ziegeler, S. Kreuer
{"title":"Methodological Aspects of Lactate Measurement – Evaluation of the Accuracy of Photometric and Biosensor Methods","authors":"A. Biedler, S. Schneider, F. Bach, S. Soltesz, W. Wilhelm, S. Ziegeler, S. Kreuer","doi":"10.2174/1874321800701010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The present investigation was designed to investigate the accuracy and precision of lactate meas- urement obtained with contemporary biosensors (Chiron Diagnostics, Nova Biomedical) and standard enzymatic pho- tometric procedures (Sigma Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Analyticon). Materials and Methods: Measurements were performed in vitro before and after the stepwise addition of 1molar sodium lactate solution to samples of fresh frozen plasma to systematically achieve lactate concentrations of up to 20 mmol/l. Results: Precision of the methods investigated varied between 1% and 7%, accuracy ranged between 2% and -33% with the variability being lowest in the Sigma photometric procedure (6%) and more than 13% in both biosensor methods. Conclusion: Biosensors for lactate measurement provide adequate accuracy in mean with the limitation of highly variable results. A true lactate value of 6 mmol/l was found to be presented between 4.4 and 7.6 mmol/l or even with higher differ- ence. Biosensors and standard enzymatic photometric procedures are only limited comparable because the differences be- tween paired determinations presented to be several mmol. The advantage of biosensors is the complete lack of preana- lytical sample preparation which appeared to be the major limitation of standard photometry methods.","PeriodicalId":272376,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874321800701010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction: The present investigation was designed to investigate the accuracy and precision of lactate meas- urement obtained with contemporary biosensors (Chiron Diagnostics, Nova Biomedical) and standard enzymatic pho- tometric procedures (Sigma Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Analyticon). Materials and Methods: Measurements were performed in vitro before and after the stepwise addition of 1molar sodium lactate solution to samples of fresh frozen plasma to systematically achieve lactate concentrations of up to 20 mmol/l. Results: Precision of the methods investigated varied between 1% and 7%, accuracy ranged between 2% and -33% with the variability being lowest in the Sigma photometric procedure (6%) and more than 13% in both biosensor methods. Conclusion: Biosensors for lactate measurement provide adequate accuracy in mean with the limitation of highly variable results. A true lactate value of 6 mmol/l was found to be presented between 4.4 and 7.6 mmol/l or even with higher differ- ence. Biosensors and standard enzymatic photometric procedures are only limited comparable because the differences be- tween paired determinations presented to be several mmol. The advantage of biosensors is the complete lack of preana- lytical sample preparation which appeared to be the major limitation of standard photometry methods.
乳酸测量的方法学方面。光度法和生物传感器法准确性的评价
简介:本研究旨在研究用现代生物传感器(Chiron Diagnostics, Nova Biomedical)和标准酶促光度法(Sigma Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Analyticon)获得的乳酸平均值的准确性和精密度。材料和方法:将1mol乳酸钠溶液逐步加入新鲜冷冻血浆样品中,在体外进行测量,系统地使乳酸浓度达到20 mmol/l。结果:所调查方法的精度在1%到7%之间变化,准确度范围在2%到-33%之间,变异在西格玛光度法中最低(6%),在两种生物传感器方法中都超过13%。结论:生物传感器测量乳酸盐具有较高的准确度,但存在结果易变的局限性。发现在4.4和7.6 mmol/l之间存在6 mmol/l的真乳酸值,甚至有更大的差异。生物传感器和标准酶光度法程序的可比性有限,因为配对测定之间的差异为几毫摩尔。生物传感器的优点是完全不需要预分析样品的制备,这似乎是标准光度法的主要限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信