Where do Blockchains Fit in the History of Financial Institutions?

Louis Bertucci
{"title":"Where do Blockchains Fit in the History of Financial Institutions?","authors":"Louis Bertucci","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3580957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I present an interpretation of economic history through the prism of financial institutions, and analyze the blockchain technology in this context. The role of institutions has gone from defining and enforcing property rights to the more active role of preventing externalities and driving the whole economy out of crises. With two exemples (the Central Clearing Platform regulation and central bank communication) I show that such an active role can introduce inefficiencies related to the cost of trust. I propose an interpretation of blockchains as \"autonomous institutions\" and show how they can alleviate this cost of trust. In terms of the Coase theorem, their use reduces the cost of transacting thereby making institutions less relevant. If blockchains ever reach broad use, traditional institutions will likely have to adapt. I conclude that we could be on the verge of an important change in the institutional landscape.","PeriodicalId":326708,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Institutions & Corruption (Topic)","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Institutions & Corruption (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3580957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this essay I present an interpretation of economic history through the prism of financial institutions, and analyze the blockchain technology in this context. The role of institutions has gone from defining and enforcing property rights to the more active role of preventing externalities and driving the whole economy out of crises. With two exemples (the Central Clearing Platform regulation and central bank communication) I show that such an active role can introduce inefficiencies related to the cost of trust. I propose an interpretation of blockchains as "autonomous institutions" and show how they can alleviate this cost of trust. In terms of the Coase theorem, their use reduces the cost of transacting thereby making institutions less relevant. If blockchains ever reach broad use, traditional institutions will likely have to adapt. I conclude that we could be on the verge of an important change in the institutional landscape.
区块链在金融机构历史中的位置?
在本文中,我通过金融机构的棱镜对经济史进行了解释,并在此背景下分析了区块链技术。机构的角色已经从界定和执行产权转变为更积极的角色,即防止外部性和推动整个经济摆脱危机。通过两个例子(中央清算平台监管和中央银行沟通),我表明,这样一个积极的角色可能会引入与信任成本相关的低效率。我建议将区块链解释为“自治机构”,并展示它们如何减轻这种信任成本。根据科斯定理,它们的使用降低了交易成本,从而降低了制度的相关性。如果区块链得到广泛应用,传统机构可能不得不适应。我的结论是,我们可能正处于制度格局发生重大变化的边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信