ONTOLOGY OF SECURITY (APPENDIX TO THE ESTABLISHMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF SECURITY)

Cane Mojanoski, Goce Arizankoski, Zlatko Angjeleski
{"title":"ONTOLOGY OF SECURITY (APPENDIX TO THE ESTABLISHMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF SECURITY)","authors":"Cane Mojanoski, Goce Arizankoski, Zlatko Angjeleski","doi":"10.20544/icp.11.01.20.p18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security sciences and scientific disciplines (as well as all natural and social sciences), depart from those philosophically determined basic principles that are grouped into theories of the being (existence) of security occurrences (ontology of security), for understanding of safety occurrences (gnoseology of security) and the values and valuation of safety occurrences (axiology of security), whereby presuppose the recognition and appreciation of security occurrences, and vice versa - the recognition of security occurrences presupposes the existence and valuation of what is known, and also the valuation assumes the existence of security occurrences and the methodological and methodological possibility of their recognition. On the aforementioned philosophical basis and methodological direction - our philosophical, i.e., ontological analysis and synthesis of security (as an idea, condition, value, need, interest, function, organization and system) begins with the long-known ontological fact that security as a practice is as old as the human race, arising from the materialization of human emotions and the urge for selfpreservation (the instinct of fear and the biological mechanism of survival of the organism), and the assumptions that man's first thoughts were utterly practical, that is, life itself had to be safe first and foremost - food, heat, protecting against catastrophes and avoiding danger were the first goals of reason, but also a longestablished anthropological finding that the need for protection, security and safety 80 is based on the basic natural laws of the struggle for existence - a sufficiently firm basis for the fact that the need for safety and security is one of the basic needs of people. In this paper we are making an effort to try and open up a debate regarding ontology of security as a separate philosophical discipline aimed at the continuous acquisition and promotion of a reference framework of chronological, current and anticipatory knowledge of the importance, the being and the idea of security (as a condition, value, need, interest, function, organization and system), as well as on the basis of security on the necessity, determinacy, continuity, importance and development of the social-security existence (human being) and humanity as an emergent form of it existence by virtue of its enduring, existential and natural-social need for security. Keywords: ontology of security, importance of security, being of security, idea for security.","PeriodicalId":369411,"journal":{"name":"THE EURO-ATLANTIC VALUES IN THE BALKAN COUNTRIES","volume":"505 1-2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE EURO-ATLANTIC VALUES IN THE BALKAN COUNTRIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20544/icp.11.01.20.p18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Security sciences and scientific disciplines (as well as all natural and social sciences), depart from those philosophically determined basic principles that are grouped into theories of the being (existence) of security occurrences (ontology of security), for understanding of safety occurrences (gnoseology of security) and the values and valuation of safety occurrences (axiology of security), whereby presuppose the recognition and appreciation of security occurrences, and vice versa - the recognition of security occurrences presupposes the existence and valuation of what is known, and also the valuation assumes the existence of security occurrences and the methodological and methodological possibility of their recognition. On the aforementioned philosophical basis and methodological direction - our philosophical, i.e., ontological analysis and synthesis of security (as an idea, condition, value, need, interest, function, organization and system) begins with the long-known ontological fact that security as a practice is as old as the human race, arising from the materialization of human emotions and the urge for selfpreservation (the instinct of fear and the biological mechanism of survival of the organism), and the assumptions that man's first thoughts were utterly practical, that is, life itself had to be safe first and foremost - food, heat, protecting against catastrophes and avoiding danger were the first goals of reason, but also a longestablished anthropological finding that the need for protection, security and safety 80 is based on the basic natural laws of the struggle for existence - a sufficiently firm basis for the fact that the need for safety and security is one of the basic needs of people. In this paper we are making an effort to try and open up a debate regarding ontology of security as a separate philosophical discipline aimed at the continuous acquisition and promotion of a reference framework of chronological, current and anticipatory knowledge of the importance, the being and the idea of security (as a condition, value, need, interest, function, organization and system), as well as on the basis of security on the necessity, determinacy, continuity, importance and development of the social-security existence (human being) and humanity as an emergent form of it existence by virtue of its enduring, existential and natural-social need for security. Keywords: ontology of security, importance of security, being of security, idea for security.
安全本体论(安全哲学的建立与发展附录)
安全科学和科学学科(以及所有自然科学和社会科学)脱离了那些哲学上确定的基本原则,这些原则被归类为安全事件的存在(存在)理论(安全本体论),以理解安全事件(安全的gnoseology)和安全事件的价值和评估(安全的价值论),从而预设了对安全事件的认识和欣赏。反之亦然——对安全事件的认识以已知事物的存在和估价为前提,估价也以安全事件的存在以及对其认识的方法和方法可能性为前提。在上述哲学基础和方法论方向上,我们对安全(作为一种观念、条件、价值、需要、兴趣、功能、组织和系统)的哲学,即本体论分析和综合,始于一个众所周知的本体论事实,即安全作为一种实践,与人类一样古老,源于人类情感的物化和自我保护的冲动(恐惧的本能和有机体生存的生物机制)。假设人类最初的想法是完全实际的,也就是说,生命本身必须首先是安全的,食物,热量,防止灾难和避免危险是理性的首要目标,但也是一个长期确立的人类学发现,对保护的需求,安全和保障是建立在生存斗争的基本自然规律基础上的——一个足够坚实的基础,证明对安全和保障的需要是人们的基本需要之一。在本文中,我们正努力尝试开启一场关于安全本体论的辩论,作为一门独立的哲学学科,其目的是不断地获取和促进一个参考框架,该框架包括对安全的重要性、存在和概念(作为一种条件、价值、需要、兴趣、功能、组织和系统)的时间顺序、当前和预期知识,以及安全的必要性、确定性、连续性、社会保障存在(人)和作为其存在形式的人类由于其对安全的持久的、存在的和自然的社会需要而出现的重要性和发展。关键词:安全本体论、安全重要性、安全存在、安全理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信